Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Published Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix xattr replace when multiple xattrs are packed in the same item If we have a btrfs_dir_item item that packs multiple xattrs and then we replace the value of one of them (with the setxattr(2) family of syscalls) with another value of a different size, we end up not having a fully initialized btrfs_dir_item, resulting in a corruption that the tree checker will detect at extent buffer writeback time. This is because in btrfs_setxattr() when we find a btrfs_dir_item with multiple xattrs (due to the crc32c hash of their name being the same) we delete one of the xattr items (btrfs_dir_item) and then insert a new one, but the deletion and insertion results in shifting existing data in the leaf and therefore when the new value of a xattr has a different size, the new btrfs_dir_item is placed in a leaf section that was not initialized and we only copy the value's data and set the value's length in the new btrfs_dir_item, without setting the name, the name's length, the key (which must be all zeroes for xattrs), flags (BTRFS_FT_XATTR) and transaction ID.
The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.
Conflicting version data — version display is hidden until the data is resolved.
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.1
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.1
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.9
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 57.81 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.1 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.1
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.9
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix xattr replace when multiple xattrs are packed in the same item If we have a btrfs_dir_item item that packs multiple xattrs and then we replace the value of one of them (with the setxattr(2) family of syscalls) with another value of a different size, we end up not having a fully initialized btrfs_dir_item, resulting in a corruption that the tree checker will detect at extent buffer writeback time. This is because in btrfs_setxattr() when we find a btrfs_dir_item with multiple xattrs (due to the crc32c hash of their name being the same) we delete one of the xattr items (btrfs_dir_item) and then insert a new one, but the deletion and insertion results in shifting existing data in the leaf and therefore when the new value of a xattr has a different size, the new btrfs_dir_item is placed in a leaf section that was not initialized and we only copy the value's data and set the value's length in the new btrfs_dir_item, without setting the name, the name's length, the key (which must be all zeroes for xattrs), flags (BTRFS_FT_XATTR) and transaction ID. The following script reproduces the issue: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT touch $MNT/testfile # Add two xattrs that, on btrfs, have the same hash (crc32c) for their # name and therefore are packed into the same btrfs_dir_item. setfattr -n user.foobar -v 123 $MNT/testfile setfattr -n user.WvG1c1Td -v qwerty $MNT/testfile # Verify the xattrs are present. echo "xattrs before:" getfattr --absolute-names --dump $MNT/testfile # Now replace the value of the foobar xattr with a significantly larger # value. setfattr -n user.foobar -v abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz $MNT/testfile # Check the xattrs have the expected values. echo "xattrs after:" getfattr --absolute-names --dump $MNT/testfile umount $MNT Running it: $ ./test.sh (...) xattrs before: # file: /mnt/sdi/testfile user.WvG1c1Td="qwerty" user.foobar="123" xattrs after: # file: /mnt/sdi/testfile user.WvG1c1Td="qwerty" So the "user.foobar" xattr is missing and there was a transaction abort when unmounting the fs with the following traces in dmesg: $ dmesg [869800.159271] BTRFS warning (device sdi): access to eb bytenr 30474240 len 16384 out of range start 16015 len 25964 [869800.159293] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [869800.159296] WARNING: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4408 at report_eb_range+0x44/0x60 [btrfs], CPU#8: getfattr/2605179 [869800.168961] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_thin_pool (...) [869800.190527] CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 2605179 Comm: getfattr Tainted: G W 7.3.0-rc3-btrfs-next-244+ #1 PREEMPT(full) [869800.193726] Tainted: [W]=WARN [869800.194502] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [869800.197576] RIP: 0010:report_eb_range+0x44/0x60 [btrfs] [869800.198985] Code: 48 8b 7b 18 (...) [869800.203531] RSP: 0018:ffffce4541937d58 EFLAGS: 00010246 [869800.204609] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8dde054b8738 RCX: 0000000000000000 [869800.206137] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffc04c92a0 [869800.207645] RBP: 0000000000003e8f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 3fffffffffefffff [869800.226175] R10: ffffce4541937a88 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 000000000000656c [869800.227594] R13: ffff8dde14be800f R14: 000000000000656c R15: 0000000000000069 [869800.229097] FS: 00007f59023bb780(0000) GS:ffff8de5788ed000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [869800.231137] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [869800.232321] CR2: 0000558dc45e6a78 CR3: 0000000765b16004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [869800.233783] Call Trace: [869800.234330] <TASK> [869800.234791] read_extent_buffer+0x4d/0x100 [btrfs] [869800.235898] btrfs_listxattr+0x199/0x240 [btrfs] [869800.236912] vfs_listxattr+0x51/0 ---truncated---
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (8)
Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell | PowerProtect Data Domain |
|
|
| Dell | PowerScale OneFS |
|
|
| IBM | DataPower Gateway |
|
|
| IBM | QRadar SIEM |
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7 |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.12 |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | — |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/0b6f31a3c0b16066f812e94b52a704174a6f23cd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/56fe03a0c05dba4c5f6a23c391f96de1614a098c
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/1d35a17f1c2ed4154731895694a1a3557f0da766
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/27c0f718d3b3c99e6d315308e95d987d0382a8a8
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/a34a230ccea1b8b667ae59dca11295a2c8f81738
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/cef2cedb6f7a394b278775b3d6ffb9b20ecd61db
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/ec6ecab1b7577ae555ee6b81480814d123dd9ec0
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/0b1eebd359685dd681f6e0df5540a5bb985a27bf
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/8fa813b7fd1eccbed13e126166cf764f1f11a7d3
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/489114c9ecae44e523361a4b3e610ee5ebd9189c
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/961563117626f4681623077ec0cfd86f86da0d49
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/f34b1bcac4581a5bd3daf9eff90f175e736b54aa
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/4d9c1e0a7fb2cfb1cc924acafc194d2c15c3e83e
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/51562a8cb11628d3a5e105b4c347ec5473e5745f
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/2f29f880e98bf0087215726c45a485afd15b42cf
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/4d98295357bcacb70874e73117e298a9d7d9b830
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/69fc6474236d9edda6983623e4282f2bdfd8e3d8
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/86acb68ebb220b83def94e7f4c33e24e843970e0
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/8c77312728d07b60fc028f676e42d842df918bcd
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/c6988714c0549e06610635c7a71e88635da6db64
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
ReceivedLinux
Description added or changed
New references:- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877d7138cc4359d26fd7b010eedfd1b3162348f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a53bb4668b319fc6c8a3ce2c21635125c7d2712
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/858bee1c77857aabcc2327cd32dd8266332de332
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a97114b9b00ed3d05156f3b2ddbf797296260389
and 1 more reference
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix xattr replace when multiple xattrs are packed in the same item If we have a btrfs_dir_item item that packs multiple xattrs and then we replace the value of one of them (with the setxattr(2) family of syscalls) with another value of a different size, we end up not having a fully initialized btrfs_dir_item, resulting in a corruption that the tree checker will detect at extent buffer writeback time. This is because in btrfs_setxattr() when we find a btrfs_dir_item with multiple xattrs (due to the crc32c hash of their name being the same) we delete one of the xattr items (btrfs_dir_item) and then insert a new one, but the deletion and insertion results in shifting existing data in the leaf and therefore when the new value of a xattr has a different size, the new btrfs_dir_item is placed in a leaf section that was not initialized and we only copy the value's data and set the value's length in the new btrfs_dir_item, without setting the name, the name's length, the key (which must be all zeroes for xattrs), flags (BTRFS_FT_XATTR) and transaction ID. The following script reproduces the issue: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT touch $MNT/testfile # Add two xattrs that, on btrfs, have the same hash (crc32c) for their # name and therefore are packed into the same btrfs_dir_item. setfattr -n user.foobar -v 123 $MNT/testfile setfattr -n user.WvG1c1Td -v qwerty $MNT/testfile # Verify the xattrs are present. echo "xattrs before:" getfattr --absolute-names --dump $MNT/testfile # Now replace the value of the foobar xattr with a significantly larger # value. setfattr -n user.foobar -v abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz $MNT/testfile # Check the xattrs have the expected values. echo "xattrs after:" getfattr --absolute-names --dump $MNT/testfile umount $MNT Running it: $ ./test.sh (...) xattrs before: # file: /mnt/sdi/testfile user.WvG1c1Td="qwerty" user.foobar="123" xattrs after: # file: /mnt/sdi/testfile user.WvG1c1Td="qwerty" So the "user.foobar" xattr is missing and there was a transaction abort when unmounting the fs with the following traces in dmesg: $ dmesg [869800.159271] BTRFS warning (device sdi): access to eb bytenr 30474240 len 16384 out of range start 16015 len 25964 [869800.159293] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [869800.159296] WARNING: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4408 at report_eb_range+0x44/0x60 [btrfs], CPU#8: getfattr/2605179 [869800.168961] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_thin_pool (...) [869800.190527] CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 2605179 Comm: getfattr Tainted: G W 7.3.0-rc3-btrfs-next-244+ #1 PREEMPT(full) [869800.193726] Tainted: [W]=WARN [869800.194502] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [869800.197576] RIP: 0010:report_eb_range+0x44/0x60 [btrfs] [869800.198985] Code: 48 8b 7b 18 (...) [869800.203531] RSP: 0018:ffffce4541937d58 EFLAGS: 00010246 [869800.204609] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8dde054b8738 RCX: 0000000000000000 [869800.206137] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffc04c92a0 [869800.207645] RBP: 0000000000003e8f R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 3fffffffffefffff [869800.226175] R10: ffffce4541937a88 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 000000000000656c [869800.227594] R13: ffff8dde14be800f R14: 000000000000656c R15: 0000000000000069 [869800.229097] FS: 00007f59023bb780(0000) GS:ffff8de5788ed000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [869800.231137] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [869800.232321] CR2: 0000558dc45e6a78 CR3: 0000000765b16004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [869800.233783] Call Trace: [869800.234330] <TASK> [869800.234791] read_extent_buffer+0x4d/0x100 [btrfs] [869800.235898] btrfs_listxattr+0x199/0x240 [btrfs] [869800.236912] vfs_listxattr+0x51/0 ---truncated---Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/98xxx/CVE-2026-98959.json">CVE-2026-98959</a>Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5877d7138cc4359d26fd7b010eedfd1b3162348fReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a53bb4668b319fc6c8a3ce2c21635125c7d2712Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/858bee1c77857aabcc2327cd32dd8266332de332Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a97114b9b00ed3d05156f3b2ddbf797296260389Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1803697a60f22743aa28ad522f805e92d45e3f0Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Linked CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2026-99087 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.4 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99086 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99085 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99084 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99083 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Write | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99082 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99081 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99080 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-99079 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 9.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-99078 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99077 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99076 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.4 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99075 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99074 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99073 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99072 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99071 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99070 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99069 | Linux Kernel: Type Confusion | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99068 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | — | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99067 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99066 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99065 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99064 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.1 | — |
Show 195 more CVEs
| Low | CVE-2026-99063 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Read | 2.3 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99062 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99061 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99060 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99059 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99058 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99057 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99056 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 7.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99055 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99054 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99053 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99052 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99051 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99050 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99049 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99048 | Linux Kernel: Deadlock | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99047 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99046 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99045 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99044 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99043 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99042 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99041 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99040 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99039 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 5.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99038 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99037 | Linux Kernel: Memory Corruption | 6.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99036 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 4.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99035 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 4.7 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99034 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99033 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99032 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99031 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99030 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99029 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99028 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99027 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 6.0 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99026 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99025 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99024 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.3 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99023 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99022 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99021 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99020 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99019 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99018 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99017 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99016 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99015 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 6.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99014 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99013 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99012 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99011 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99010 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99009 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-99008 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.7 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99007 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99006 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-99005 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.5 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99004 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99003 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-99002 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Read | 7.1 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99001 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-99000 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98999 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98998 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98997 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98996 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98995 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98994 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98993 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98992 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98991 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98990 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98989 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98988 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98987 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98986 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98985 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 4.7 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98984 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.5 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98983 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98982 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98981 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98980 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98979 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98978 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98977 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.2 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98976 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98975 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98974 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98973 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98972 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98971 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.0 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98970 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98969 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Read | 3.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98968 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98967 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98966 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98965 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98964 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.3 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98963 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98962 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98961 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98960 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98959 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98958 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98957 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98956 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98955 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98954 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Access | 4.4 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98953 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98952 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98951 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98950 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.4 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98949 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98948 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98947 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 2.6 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98946 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98945 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.6 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98944 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98943 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98942 | Linux Kernel: Use of Uninitialized Memory | 4.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98941 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 7.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98940 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 6.7 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98939 | Linux Kernel: Deadlock | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98938 | Linux Kernel: Use of Uninitialized Memory | — | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98937 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98936 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98935 | Linux Kernel: Information Disclosure | 3.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98934 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98933 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98932 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 5.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98931 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98930 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.4 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98929 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.0 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98928 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98927 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98926 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98925 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 2.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98924 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98923 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98922 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98921 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98920 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98919 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98918 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | — | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98917 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98916 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98915 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98914 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98913 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98912 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98911 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98910 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98909 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98908 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 1.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98907 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98906 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98905 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98904 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98903 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98902 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98901 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98900 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98899 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98898 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98897 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98896 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98895 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98894 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98893 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98892 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98891 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98890 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98889 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98888 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98887 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98886 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98885 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98884 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98883 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98882 | Linux Kernel: Buffer Overflow | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98881 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98880 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98879 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98878 | Linux Kernel: Denial of Service | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98877 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98876 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98875 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-98874 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 3.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98873 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-98872 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2026-98871 | Linux Kernel: Deadlock | — | — |
| High | CVE-2026-98870 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 8.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-50169 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-98959"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-98959.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-98959 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>