DBI: Improper Input Validation (CVE-2026-34197)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Apache ActiveMQ Broker to version 5.19.4, Apache ActiveMQ Broker to version 6.2.3, Apache ActiveMQ All to version 5.19.4. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Apache ActiveMQ Broker
lt *..5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ Broker
lt 6.0.0..6.2.3 - Apache ActiveMQ All
lt *..5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ All
lt 6.0.0..6.2.3 - Apache ActiveMQ
lt *..5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ
lt 6.0.0..6.2.3
- Apache ActiveMQ Broker
- Fixed in
- Apache ActiveMQ Broker
5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ Broker
6.2.3 - Apache ActiveMQ All
5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ All
6.2.3 - Apache ActiveMQ
5.19.4 - Apache ActiveMQ
6.2.3
- Apache ActiveMQ Broker
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
98.3 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.92
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 175.86 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 98.3 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.92
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 17 April 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-20, CWE-94, CWE-78
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This CVE sits on KEV because an authenticated web-console user can achieve full remote code execution on the broker JVM through a default-enabled HTTP endpoint — typically with the privileges of a central integration service wired into many back-end systems. Attackers routinely chain weak or default console credentials with the Jolokia path, so any ActiveMQ instance with a reachable console must be treated as highly exposed, and the exploitation likelihood sits in the top band. Rank remediation as: (1) brokers with internet-facing or flat-network consoles — emergency patch within 24 h; (2) internal brokers using shared admin credentials — patch within the next standard change window; (3) embedded brokers inside applications — track via dependency scans and ship with the next application release. Even without the CISA ransomware flag, the asset is an attractive pivot into ERP, OT/SCADA and B2B integration estates.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Patch now: upgrade Apache ActiveMQ to 5.19.4 (5.x branch) or 6.2.3 (6.x branch). Applies equally to Broker, "All" distribution and Classic. Rolling upgrade across a network-of-brokers is supported but document the order.
- If patching has to wait: block the
/api/jolokia/endpoint and the web console at the reverse proxy, ingress controller or local firewall. Permit access only from a dedicated management network, never from production or internet-facing zones. - Harden the Jolokia access policy: edit
jolokia-access.xmlinside the web-console WAR and explicitly denyexecoperations againstorg.apache.activemq:*MBeans (<deny><mbean><name>org.apache.activemq:*</name><operation>*</operation></mbean></deny>), then redeploy the console. - Inventory every account that can reach the web console (
activemq.xml,users.properties,jetty-realm.properties), remove any default credentials (admin:admin) and rotate passwords. Authenticated access is the exploitation prerequisite. - Inspect broker JVMs for active Spring-XML loads from external sources (running processes, outbound HTTP(S) from the broker process). On suspicion, isolate the broker, capture heap and thread dumps, and treat as compromise.
- CMDB sweep: find every ActiveMQ instance including embedded brokers inside Java applications, container images and legacy integration servers. Rebuild container images in the registry — do not just restart running pods.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: expose the Jolokia path
/api/jolokia/*and the web-console port (default 8161/TCP) only to a defined admin VLAN. Keep OpenWire (61616/TCP), AMQP (5672), MQTT (1883) and STOMP (61613) open for message clients, management strictly separated. - WAF / reverse-proxy rule: block HTTP requests to
/api/jolokia/carrying"type":"EXEC"or any MBean parameter containingaddNetworkConnector,addConnector,brokerConfigorxbean:in the JSON body. Alternatively drop all requests matching/api/jolokia/exec/org.apache.activemq:*. - Jolokia policy on allowlist: whitelist only the read operations monitoring actually needs (QueueSize, EnqueueCount, etc.). Combine with egress filtering so the broker host cannot fetch external HTTP/HTTPS, preventing
ResourceXmlApplicationContextfrom loading remote XML. - Endpoint hardening: run the broker JVM under a dedicated UID with no shell, enforce an SELinux/AppArmor profile that blocks
fork/execofsh,bash,curl,wgetfrom the Java process. On Windows: Software Restriction Policy or WDAC against child processes of the ActiveMQ service. - IAM least privilege: distinct roles for message clients and web-console users, admin access via an MFA jump host only. Application service accounts must not be allowed to log into the console.
- Snort/Suricata: alert and drop on HTTP URI
/api/jolokia/combined with contentbrokerConfig=xbean:oraddNetworkConnector.
- Network segmentation: expose the Jolokia path
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Web-server / Jetty access log: requests to
/api/jolokia/exec/org.apache.activemq:*or POSTs to/api/jolokia/returning HTTP 200, especially from non-management source IPs. KQL sketch:W3CIISLog | where csUriStem has "/api/jolokia/" and csMethod == "POST". - Sysmon EID 1 / auditd
execve: process ancestry showingjavaspawning/bin/sh,cmd.exe,powershell.exe,curl,wget,base64as a child of the ActiveMQ broker. Sigma shape:parent_image|endswith: 'java'AND command line containing shell primitives, with ActiveMQ context. - Network telemetry (Zeek
http.log): outbound HTTP(S) GETs from the broker host to external URLs returningtext/xmlor ending in.xml— a signature of a loaded Spring context. Baseline: a broker normally talks to clients, not outbound to the web. - ActiveMQ broker log (
activemq.log): entries referencingResourceXmlApplicationContext,brokerConfig,addNetworkConnectoror stack traces fromorg.springframework.context.supportoccurring after startup. - EDR: new persistent outbound connections from the JVM to broker peers that are not in configured network connectors (unexpected OpenWire sessions after an
addNetworkConnectorcall). Alert onnetstatdeltas per broker.
- Web-server / Jetty access log: requests to
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Improper Input Validation, Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ. Apache ActiveMQ Classic exposes the Jolokia JMX-HTTP bridge at /api/jolokia/ on the web console. The default Jolokia access policy permits exec operations on all ActiveMQ MBeans (org.apache.activemq:*), including BrokerService.addNetworkConnector(String) and BrokerService.addConnector(String). An authenticated attacker can invoke these operations with a crafted discovery URI that triggers the VM transport's brokerConfig parameter to load a remote Spring XML application context using ResourceXmlApplicationContext. Because Spring's ResourceXmlApplicationContext instantiates all singleton beans before the BrokerService validates the configuration, arbitrary code execution occurs on the broker's JVM through bean factory methods such as Runtime.exec(). This issue affects Apache ActiveMQ Broker: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ All: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3; Apache ActiveMQ: before 5.19.4, from 6.0.0 before 6.2.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 5.19.4 or 6.2.3, which fixes the issue
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | DBI |
|
|
| — | gnutls |
|
|
| — | libxml2 |
|
|
| acl project | acl |
|
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ |
|
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ All |
|
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ All Module |
|
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache ActiveMQ Broker |
|
|
Distribution and container packages (10)
Downstream packages (e.g. Bitnami, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat). Versions refer to the distribution, not the vendor.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| bitnami | activemq |
|
|
| bitnami | jre |
|
|
| bitnami | thrift |
|
|
| bitnami | tomcat |
|
|
From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (129)
Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | jackson-databind (FasterXML Jackson, Java) |
|
|
| Amazon | Corretto |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bamboo Data Center |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bamboo Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bamboo LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket Data Center |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence Data Center |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence LTS |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | ubuntu | aws | bionic |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws | xenial |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | aws-hwe | xenial |
| Linux | ubuntu | azure | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | azure | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | azure | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | azure | xenial |
| Linux | ubuntu | azure-4.15 | bionic |
| Linux | debian | cifs-utils | trixie |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 7.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 10.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 10.2 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 8.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 9.8 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 6.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 9.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_aus | 8.4 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_aus | 8.6 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_els | 7.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_eus | 8.4 |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-20Improper Input Validation
Class
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
Entry at MITRE CWE-20CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Entry at MITRE CWE-94CWE-78Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
Entry at MITRE CWE-78
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-34197 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-34197 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | apache-activemq-rce-research (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-34197 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-34197 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-49270advisory
- github.comapache/activemqpackage
- lists.apache.orgthread/k3233c1x506z3w7x4z0dqvd86d4v2fr2web, Vendor advisory
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2026/05/31/22web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42403advisory
- github.comapache/ws-neethipackage
- lists.apache.orgthread/zm6t8skkkskjwk1881l4m4n0l7dqclzoweb, Vendor advisory, Mailing list, Vendor advisory
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2026/05/01/7web, Mailing list, Third-party advisory
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/0b9e4bbfb7c949151e3acd44ed4aa33614d2e110euvd, Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/81af4137a30c4c2dc694dea8cacb180bd66000efeuvd, Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/5424e678f9b304e148cf5dcc047cffc7a56a3bb5euvd, Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/9a2d9d4e657b23dc21f24cf139e3aeff0b61341feuvd, Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/df4601653201de21b487c3e7fffd464790cab808euvd, Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/c502fa9f094cb03d1d1685c71e2105ab359bc2b8Patch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/a6ae4511c07b91f597e461406c6330f0d4ff810ePatch
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/1406c4e0ed1eaf8a29801ab1163d00fb7ee4359aPatch
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-019113.html
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-457936.html
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-784472.html
- sourceware.orgbugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33998euvd
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedRed Hat ADP
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed Red Hat AMQ Broker 7, Red Hat Data Grid 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+6)Red Hat AMQ Broker 7, Red Hat Data Grid 8, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+6)Source identifier: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference type added —redhat-SADP: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34197 Types: Third Party AdvisoryReference type added —redhat-SADP: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2455869 Types: Third Party AdvisoryReference type added —redhat-SADP: https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-34197.json Types: Third Party AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Linked CVEs
| Critical | CVE-2026-9698 | DBI versions before 1.648 for Perl saved errors in a limited-sized buffer | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-8177 | SHLOMIF XML::LibXML: Out-of-bounds Read | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-66144 | Apache Neethi: Remote PolicyReference fetch lacks resource bounds | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-66143 | Apache Neethi: Missing global alternative-output budget across policy computation paths | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-66142 | Apache Neethi: Uncontrolled recursion in policy processing | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-66053 | Apache Thrift: Python TSSLSocket Hostname Matcher Import | 5.9 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-64530 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 9.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-6238 | Buffer overread in ns_printrrf with corrupted RDATA field | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-60147 | Oracle Java SE: security vulnerability | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-60081 | DBI::ProfileData versions before 1.651 for Perl do not limit the path index | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-59888 | jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-59858 | Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via C Omni-Completion | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-5928 | Potential buffer under-read in ungetwc | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-59084 | Apache Tomcat: EncryptInterceptor requirements not clearly documented | 9.1 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-59083 | Apache Tomcat: Incorrect URL decoding in RewriteValve may allow security control bypass | 9.1 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-58016 | Glib: integer underflow in gio/gdbusintrospection.c via "g_dbus_node_info_new_for_xml" | 9.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-57456 | Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via Python Omni-Completion Docstrings | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-57455 | Vim: Stack out-of-bounds write in `spell_soundfold_sofo()` via an over-length `soundfold()` argument | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55956 | Apache Tomcat: Security constraints for default servlet ignored method | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55955 | Apache Tomcat: EncryptInterceptor not protected against replay attacks | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-55693 | Vim: Out-of-bounds Write in Spell File Word Count | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55655 | Red Hat: Improper Restriction of Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints | 6.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55653 | Red Hat: Double Free | 6.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-55276 | Apache Tomcat: Logged effective web.xml is incomplete | 9.1 | — |
Show 125 more CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2026-5522 | QRadar contains hard-coded credentials | 6.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-55153 | Swaldman Mchange-commons-java: Unsafe Reflection | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-54515 | jackson-databind: Case-insensitive deserialization bypasses per-property @JsonIgnoreProperties | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-54514 | jackson-databind: InetSocketAddress deserialization triggers eager DNS resolution (SSRF) | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54513 | FasterXML Jackson-databind: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54512 | FasterXML Jackson-databind: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs | 8.1 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-5450 | scanf %mc off-by-one heap buffer overflow | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54475 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Missing Authorization | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54370 | acl < 2.4.0 TOCTOU Symlink Traversal via getfacl/setfacl/chacl | 6.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54369 | acl < 2.4.0 Symlink Traversal Privilege Escalation via libacl Functions | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-5435 | Potential buffer overflow in ns_sprintrrf TSIG handling path | 8.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53917 | Apache ActiveMQ: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53916 | Apache ActiveMQ: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-53434 | Apache Tomcat: Invalid CRL configuration doesn't trigger failure for FFM Connector | 9.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53404 | Apache Tomcat: Bad ornext processing in RewriteValve | 7.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53359 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 8.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-53266 | Linux Kernel Out-of-Bounds Write Vulnerability | 8.8 | Actively exploited |
| High | CVE-2026-53071 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53059 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Write | 7.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-53006 | Linux Kernel: Expired Pointer Dereference | 9.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-52993 | Linux Kernel: Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-52923 | Linux Kernel: Improper Input Validation | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-5260 | Gnutls: gnutls: information disclosure via heap overread in rsa key exchange | 8.2 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-50734 | Apache ActiveMQ: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-50722 | IKEv2 Denial of Service via RSA-SHA1 (PKCS#1 RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5) authentication payload | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-50721 | IKEv1 Denial of Service via RSA-SHA1 (PKCS#1 Version 1.5 Encrypted) authentication payload | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-49434 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Improper Input Validation | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-49432 | Apache ActiveMQ: Improper Input Validation | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-49270 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-49157 | Apache ActiveMQ: Incorrect Default Permissions | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-48864 | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10: Out-of-bounds Write | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-4878 | Libcap: libcap: privilege escalation via toctou race condition in cap_set_file() | 7.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-47063 | Oracle Java SE: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-47059 | Oracle Java SE: Denial of Service | 3.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-47058 | Oracle Java SE: Deserialization of Untrusted Data | 7.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-47057 | Oracle Java SE: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-47027 | Oracle Java SE: Improper Access Control | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-47021 | Oracle Java SE: Denial of Service | 5.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-47010 | Oracle Java SE: security vulnerability | 3.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-46968 | Oracle Java SE: Improper Access Control | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-46917 | Oracle Java SE: Denial of Service | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-46605 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Improper Authorization | 4.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46331 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46259 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46227 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46209 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46189 | Linux Kernel: Double Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46150 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46145 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-46135 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46117 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46116 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46113 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46090 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46086 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 7.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-46054 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-45984 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-45505 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Code Injection | 8.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-44930 | Apache CXF: LDAP Injection vulnerability in XKMS LDAP Repository | 9.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-44618 | Apache CXF: XXE vulnerability in WS-Transfer functionality | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-44431 | urllib3: Sensitive headers forwarded across origins in proxied low-level redirects | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-44417 | Apache CXF: Incomplete fix for CVE-2025-48913 (Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE) | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43869 | Apache Thrift: TSSLTransportFactory.java hostname verification | 7.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43499 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43450 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Read | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43279 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-43198 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43116 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43112 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Read | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-43056 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42588 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Code Injection | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42404 | Apache Neethi: Unrestricted HTTP Redirect Following in Policy References | 7.2 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42403 | Apache Neethi: Circular Policy Reference Infinite Loop | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42402 | Apache Neethi: Policy Normalization Unbounded Resource Allocation DoS | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-42253 | Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Web: HTTP Response Header Injection via JMS Message Properties | 6.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42198 | pgjdbc: Unbounded PBKDF2 iterations in SCRAM authentication allows CPU exhaustion DoS | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-42015 | Gnutls: gnutls: memory corruption due to off-by-one error in pkcs#12 bag handling | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42013 | Gnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to oversized subject alternative name | 8.2 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42012 | Gnutls: gnutls: certificate validation bypass due to improper handling of uri and srv sans | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42011 | Gnutls: gnutls: security bypass due to incorrect name constraint handling | 7.4 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-42010 | Gnutls: gnutls: authentication bypass via nul character in username | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-42009 | Gnutls: gnutls: denial of service via dtls packet reordering vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-41603 | Apache Thrift: Java TSSLTransportFactory hostname verification | 7.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-41411 | Vim: Command injection via backtick expansion in tag filenames | 6.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-41254 | little cms color engine: Integer Overflow or Wraparound | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-41044 | Apache ActiveMQ: Code Injection | 8.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-41043 | Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Web: ActiveMQ Web Console - XSS vulnerability when browsing queues | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-40466 | Apache ActiveMQ Broker: Code Injection | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-40046 | Apache ActiveMQ: Integer Overflow or Wraparound | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-39304 | Apache ActiveMQ: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-3833 | Gnutls: gnutls: policy bypass due to case-sensitive nameconstraints comparison | 7.4 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-34197 | Apache ActiveMQ Improper Input Validation Vulnerability | 8.8 | Actively exploited |
| High | CVE-2026-33846 | Gnutls: gnutls: denial of service via heap buffer overflow in dtls handshake fragment reassembly | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-33845 | Gnutls: gnutls: denial of service via dtls zero-length fragment | 9.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-33558 | Apache Kafka, Apache Kafka Clients: Information Exposure Through Network Client Log Output | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-33416 | LIBPNG has use-after-free via pointer aliasing in `png_set_tRNS` and `png_set_PLTE` | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-33227 | Apache ActiveMQ: Path Traversal | 4.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-31692 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-31488 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-31419 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-31411 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-25749 | Heap Overflow in Vim | 6.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-23216 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 8.4 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-16441 | Eclipse OpenJ9 : Method resolution default method precedence failure | 9.6 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-16439 | Eclipse OpenJ9 : Using -Xtrace to trace method arguments can lead to buffer underflow | 9.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-16243 | Eclipse OMR : arraycmp SIMD implementation does not check if the number of bytes to compare is zero | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-15392 | HMBRAND DBD::File: Path Traversal | 7.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-15308 | Python Software Foundation CPython: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-15043 | HMBRAND DBI::SQL::Nano: Use of Incorrect Operator | 9.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-14739 | HMBRAND DBI: Out-of-bounds Write | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-14476 | Red Hat: Relative Path Traversal | 8.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-14474 | Red Hat: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-14380 | DBI versions before 1.650 for Perl are vulnerable to code injection via caller-influenced Profile | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-12505 | Cifs-utils: local privilege escalation via forged cifs.spnego key description in cifs.upcall | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-12413 | IKEv2 Denial of Service via malformed fragmentation | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-10879 | HMBRAND DBI: Out-of-bounds Write | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-10846 | Insufficient verification that responses belong to a query | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-71089 | Linux Kernel: Use After Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-71066 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-66168 | Apache ActiveMQ: Integer Overflow or Wraparound | 8.8 | — |
| Low | CVE-2025-6170 | Libxml2: stack buffer overflow in xmllint interactive shell command handling | 2.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2025-48913 | Apache CXF: Untrusted JMS configuration can lead to RCE | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-40026 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-13151 | GnuTLS Libtasn1: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2025-10263 | Arm C1-Ultra: Race Condition | 9.3 | — |
Linked advisories
- Frontier LLMs Generate Flawed PatchesSANS NewsBites
- Healthcare Software Company ChipSoft Suffers Ransomware AttackSANS NewsBites
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-34197"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-34197.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-34197 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>