FreeBSD: Double Free (CVE-2026-18798)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A malformed INITIAL packet with an invalid DCID (destination connection ID) can cause the QUIC server to double free the QRX object.
Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.2, OpenSSL to version 3.6.4, OpenSSL to version 3.5.8.
- Affected
- OpenSSL
lt 4.0.0..4.0.2 - OpenSSL
lt 3.6.0..3.6.4 - OpenSSL
lt 3.5.0..3.5.8
- OpenSSL
- Fixed in
- OpenSSL
4.0.2 - OpenSSL
3.6.4 - OpenSSL
3.5.8
- OpenSSL
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
1.7 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 77.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 80.39 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 1.7 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 77.1
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 25 August 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-415
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A malformed INITIAL packet with an invalid DCID (destination connection ID) can cause the QUIC server to double free the QRX object. This issue leads to memory corruption, causing the termination of the QUIC server process and resulting in a denial of service.
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FreeBSD | FreeBSD |
|
|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
|
|
| openssl | openssl |
|
|
| FreeBSD Project | FreeBSD OS |
|
|
| Meinberg | LANTIME |
|
|
| Open Source | OpenSSL |
|
|
| Oracle | Communications |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| BSD | freebsd | freebsd | 14.4 |
| BSD | freebsd | freebsd | 15.1 |
| BSD | freebsd | freebsd | 15.0 |
| Linux | debian | openssl | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | openssl | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | resolute |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-415Double Free
Variant
The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.
Entry at MITRE CWE-415
References & sources
- openssl-library.orgOpenSSL AdvisoryVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- github.com3.0.22 git commitPatch
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- github.com3.0.22 git commitPatch
- security.freebsd.orgadvisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:56.hwpmc.ascVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- security.freebsd.orgadvisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:60.ppp.ascVendor advisory
- security.freebsd.orgadvisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:59.mac_do.ascVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- OpenSSL (3.5.0 – before 3.5.8; 3.6.0 – before 3.6.4; 4.0.0 – before 4.0.2)
New references:Show 5 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.4 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.2Reference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/70cebd74d3592f5272945501b58a60374c4e13af Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/967582d5037f01a26b6d19beae19af62a1b15c3c Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a14a1deac403522fbeafabcb198503cf6caa7dc4 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-18798","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-25T14:15:00.501697Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedopenssl.org
Weakness type: CWE-415
Description added or changed
New references:Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —OpenSSLDescription added —Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object when channel creation fails for initial packet. Impact summary: Double free leads to heap corruption, which typically results in termination of QUIC server process, leading to Denial of Service. There is so far no evidence that this double free is exploitable for remote code execution, thus it is considered highly improbable. CWE: CWE-415: Double Free Description: In order to validate initial packet, OpenSSL QUIC stack default packet handler (port_default_packet_handler()) creates a so-called QRX object. If the initial packet validates successfully with QRX object, the default packet handler proceeds to channel (connection object) creation. The QRX object used for packet validation is passed to port_bind_channel(), so it becomes part of the newly created connection. If port_bind_channel() fails, then it also frees the QRX object. Once port_bind_channel() returns, the port_default_packet_handler() detects the failure and proceeds to the error branch, where the same QRX object is freed for the second time. The failure in port_bind_channel() function can be induced with a relatively low effort by a malformed (non RFC 9000 compliant) INITIAL packet. If the packet carries DCID (destination connection ID) which is shorter than 8 bytes, then port_bind_channel() jumps to the error path after ossl_quic_lcidm_enrol_odcid() detects that the DCID has invalid length. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected, as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-415Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/70cebd74d3592f5272945501b58a60374c4e13afReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/967582d5037f01a26b6d19beae19af62a1b15c3cReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a14a1deac403522fbeafabcb198503cf6caa7dc4Reference added —https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txtSource identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org
Linked CVEs
| High | CVE-2026-63076 | Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-63075 | QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-63074 | CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-63073 | Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation | 7.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-63072 | Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58097 | ppp(8): missing length validation in mp_SetEnddisc() | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58096 | ppp(8): missing length validation in LcpDecodeConfig() | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58095 | ppp(8): incorrect length calculation in mp_Enddisc() | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58094 | TOCTOU race in POSIX shared memory large page configuration | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58093 | Kernel use-after-free via tty ioctls | 7.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58092 | Unauthorized credential switching | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58091 | Kernel use-after-free via the SNDCTL_DSP_SYNCSTART ioctl | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58090 | Use-after-free in unix SOCK_STREAM message handling | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-58089 | hwpmc fails to detach PMCs during exec credential transitions | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54874 | Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-18798 | QUIC Server May Trigger Double Free When Processing INITIAL Packet | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-14457 | RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate | 7.5 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-18798"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-18798.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-18798 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>