CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, SUSE, Debian LTS, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. The CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) implementation does not clear cached additional certificates when an invalid message is received, leading to excessive memory consumption.
Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.2, OpenSSL to version 3.6.4, OpenSSL to version 3.5.8.
- Affected
- OpenSSL
lt 4.0.0..4.0.2 - OpenSSL
lt 3.6.0..3.6.4 - OpenSSL
lt 3.5.0..3.5.8 - OpenSSL
lt 3.4.0..3.4.7 - OpenSSL
lt 3.0.0..3.0.22
- OpenSSL
- Fixed in
- OpenSSL
4.0.2 - OpenSSL
3.6.4 - OpenSSL
3.5.8 - OpenSSL
3.4.7 - OpenSSL
3.0.22
- OpenSSL
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.9
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
5.9
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, SUSE, Debian LTS, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 72.07 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.9 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.9
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.1
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 25 August 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-770
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. The CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) implementation does not clear cached additional certificates when an invalid message is received, leading to excessive memory consumption. This allows a malicious client to repeatedly send requests containing unique extra certificates to cause memory exhaustion, eventually resulting in a denial of service.
Source: redhat_csaf, Debian Security Advisories, Ubuntu Security Notices, suse_csaf, Debian LTS Advisories, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, Microsoft Security Update Guide
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
|
|
| openssl | openssl |
|
|
| FreeBSD Project | FreeBSD OS |
|
|
| Meinberg | LANTIME |
|
|
| Open Source | OpenSSL |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | openssl | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | openssl | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | resolute |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Base
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
Entry at MITRE CWE-770
References & sources
- openssl-library.orgOpenSSL AdvisoryVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- github.com3.0.22 git commitPatch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- OpenSSL (3.5.0 – before 3.5.8; 3.6.0 – before 3.6.4; 4.0.0 – before 4.0.2; 3.4.0 – before 3.4.7; 3.0.0 – before 3.0.22)
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01e567978a55fba18142a230380c31296049fae7
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/21a5d9658b0c66daace60e10ea18ff32a448de9f
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/74ae7f6df47a5767c1010b88c47507dfc5b32c46
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/75360af9650d4e0c82ba0050c5c9912cd79e54af
and 2 more references
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.4 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.4.0 up to (excluding) 3.4.7 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.0.0 up to (excluding) 3.0.22Reference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01e567978a55fba18142a230380c31296049fae7 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/21a5d9658b0c66daace60e10ea18ff32a448de9f Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/74ae7f6df47a5767c1010b88c47507dfc5b32c46 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/75360af9650d4e0c82ba0050c5c9912cd79e54af Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f636f9ca0fa1bae5b42f9e787f025c96fb09c43a Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-63074","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-25T14:36:10.702053Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedopenssl.org
Weakness type: CWE-770
Description added or changed
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01e567978a55fba18142a230380c31296049fae7
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/21a5d9658b0c66daace60e10ea18ff32a448de9f
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/74ae7f6df47a5767c1010b88c47507dfc5b32c46
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/75360af9650d4e0c82ba0050c5c9912cd79e54af
and 2 more references
Show 9 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —OpenSSLDescription added —Issue summary: The OpenSSL Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) caches additional certificates (extraCerts) sent in a CMP message, but never expunges them (for instance if they are invalid). If a server reuses an OSSL_CMP_CTX frequently, this cache of extraCerts may grow unboundedly, and a malicious client may flood a CMP server with requests driving this growth. Impact summary: Users utilizing a CMP server that reuses a single OSSL_CMP_CTX for the lifetime of a server process may observe unbounded memory growth in the event a malicious client repeatedly sends requests containing unique extra certificates, which may lead to OOM conditions. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: If a remote user sends CMP messages to a server with a list of extraCerts and the message is rejected, the extraCerts from the message remains in the server contexts untrusted certificate stack. This exposes servers with long lived ctx objects to Denial of Service attacks in which an attacker sends messages intending to be rejected with a large list of additional certificates repeatedly, forcing the server to store them indefinitely. The issue was fixed by removing the added extra certs if the message is rejected, using the same method as when the context is configured to not do caching at all. FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-770Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01e567978a55fba18142a230380c31296049fae7Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/21a5d9658b0c66daace60e10ea18ff32a448de9fReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/74ae7f6df47a5767c1010b88c47507dfc5b32c46Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/75360af9650d4e0c82ba0050c5c9912cd79e54afReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f636f9ca0fa1bae5b42f9e787f025c96fb09c43aReference added —https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txtSource identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63074"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63074.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63074 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>