Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Debian, Debian LTS, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax) message can cause an 8-byte out-of-bounds heap write when it is decrypted with CMS_decrypt().
An exploit is publicly available. Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.2, OpenSSL to version 3.6.4, OpenSSL to version 3.5.8.
- Affected
- OpenSSL
lt 4.0.0..4.0.2 - OpenSSL
lt 3.6.0..3.6.4 - OpenSSL
lt 3.5.0..3.5.8 - OpenSSL
lt 3.4.0..3.4.7 - OpenSSL
lt 3.0.0..3.0.22 - OpenSSL
lt 1.1.1..1.1.1zi
- OpenSSL
- Fixed in
- OpenSSL
4.0.2 - OpenSSL
3.6.4 - OpenSSL
3.5.8 - OpenSSL
3.4.7 - OpenSSL
3.0.22 - OpenSSL
1.1.1zi
- OpenSSL
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Debian, Debian LTS, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
0.9 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 60.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 90.74 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.9 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 60.1
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 25 August 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-787
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMS (Cryptographic Message Syntax) message can cause an 8-byte out-of-bounds heap write when it is decrypted with CMS_decrypt(). This issue occurs because the CMS decryption process incorrectly sizes the key-unwrap output buffer when using the AES-WRAP-PAD unwrap primitive. This can lead to memory corruption, resulting in a denial of service.
Source: redhat_csaf, Ubuntu Security Notices, suse_csaf, Debian Security Advisories, Debian LTS Advisories, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, Microsoft Security Update Guide
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
|
|
| openssl | openssl |
|
|
| FreeBSD Project | FreeBSD OS |
|
|
| Meinberg | LANTIME |
|
|
| Open Source | OpenSSL |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | openssl | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | openssl | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | resolute |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write
Base
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Entry at MITRE CWE-787
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-63072 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- openssl-library.orgOpenSSL AdvisoryVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- github.com3.0.22 git commitPatch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- OpenSSL (3.5.0 – before 3.5.8; 3.6.0 – before 3.6.4; 4.0.0 – before 4.0.2; 3.4.0 – before 3.4.7; 3.0.0 – before 3.0.22)
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2a3dac874c8057c1f0186849bf1ede1ae7b6b756
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87784ad619af36b8807c2044b3940006fccc1e42
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9530a5fd1aacaeccdced4478ea2340a480613335
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9ec2f6d2ae2bcad907cf7ee38584855bafe4979a
and 2 more references
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.4 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.4.0 up to (excluding) 3.4.7 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.0.0 up to (excluding) 3.0.22Reference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2a3dac874c8057c1f0186849bf1ede1ae7b6b756 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87784ad619af36b8807c2044b3940006fccc1e42 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9530a5fd1aacaeccdced4478ea2340a480613335 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9ec2f6d2ae2bcad907cf7ee38584855bafe4979a Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a0c8ec557d9cac078f032d76cdf684fe743eb382 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-63072","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-25T14:29:50.344129Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedopenssl.org
Weakness type: CWE-787
Description added or changed
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2a3dac874c8057c1f0186849bf1ede1ae7b6b756
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87784ad619af36b8807c2044b3940006fccc1e42
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9530a5fd1aacaeccdced4478ea2340a480613335
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9ec2f6d2ae2bcad907cf7ee38584855bafe4979a
and 2 more references
Show 9 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —OpenSSLDescription added —Issue summary: OpenSSL CMS decryption sizes the key-unwrap output buffer based on querying the unwrapped key size, but the AES-WRAP-PAD unwrap primitive can write and cleanse more bytes than that query reports, causing an 8-byte out-of-bounds heap write. Impact summary: An attacker who supplies a crafted CMS message can trigger a deterministic 8-byte out-of-bounds heap write when the victim decrypts it with CMS_decrypt(), corrupting the heap and typically resulting in a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write Description: The key-wrap OID is potentially attacker-controlled on the wire. CMS unwrapping allows both id-aesNNN-wrap-pad and id-aesNNN-wrap ciphers. An attacker can take a legitimate message and change a single OID byte to select the padded variant while leaving the message otherwise valid. Since the unwrap key is derived from the recipient's private operation (ECDH key agreement or ML-KEM decapsulation), the RFC 5649 integrity check cannot pass, and the decryption fails with integrity failure. The write is a fixed-size (8-byte), fixed-value (zero) heap overflow immediately past the allocation, requires no special configuration, and is reachable from the public CMS_decrypt() function. The consequence is a heap corruption leading to a Denial of Service. The fix in the CMS code sizes the unwrap output buffer for the worst case so a failed unwrap cannot write past the allocation. FIPS impact: no As the CMS code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-787Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2a3dac874c8057c1f0186849bf1ede1ae7b6b756Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87784ad619af36b8807c2044b3940006fccc1e42Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9530a5fd1aacaeccdced4478ea2340a480613335Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/9ec2f6d2ae2bcad907cf7ee38584855bafe4979aReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a0c8ec557d9cac078f032d76cdf684fe743eb382Reference added —https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txtSource identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63072"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63072.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63072 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>