Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Msrc Update Guide, Debian LTS, CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) message can cause an invalid pointer dereference due to a missing type check in the password-based protection verification.
Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.2, OpenSSL to version 3.6.4, OpenSSL to version 3.5.8.
- Affected
- OpenSSL
lt 4.0.0..4.0.2 - OpenSSL
lt 3.6.0..3.6.4 - OpenSSL
lt 3.5.0..3.5.8 - OpenSSL
lt 3.4.0..3.4.7 - OpenSSL
lt 3.0.0..3.0.22
- OpenSSL
- Fixed in
- OpenSSL
4.0.2 - OpenSSL
3.6.4 - OpenSSL
3.5.8 - OpenSSL
3.4.7 - OpenSSL
3.0.22
- OpenSSL
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Msrc Update Guide, Debian LTS, CVE.org, BSI
1.6 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 75.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 107.83 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 1.6 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 75.7
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-476
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) message can cause an invalid pointer dereference due to a missing type check in the password-based protection verification. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash applications acting as a CMP server or client, resulting in a denial of service.
Source: redhat_csaf, suse_csaf, Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian Security Advisories, Microsoft Security Update Guide, Debian LTS Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL | OpenSSL |
|
|
| openssl | openssl |
|
|
| FreeBSD Project | FreeBSD OS |
|
|
| Meinberg | LANTIME |
|
|
| Open Source | OpenSSL |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | openssl | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | openssl | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssl | resolute |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-476NULL Pointer Dereference
Base
The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.
Entry at MITRE CWE-476
References & sources
- openssl-library.orgOpenSSL AdvisoryVendor advisory
- github.com4.0.2 git commitPatch
- github.com3.6.4 git commitPatch
- github.com3.5.8 git commitPatch
- github.com3.4.7 git commitPatch
- github.com3.0.22 git commitPatch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- OpenSSL (3.5.0 – before 3.5.8; 3.6.0 – before 3.6.4; 4.0.0 – before 4.0.2; 3.4.0 – before 3.4.7; 3.0.0 – before 3.0.22)
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226
and 2 more references
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.4 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.4.0 up to (excluding) 3.4.7 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.0.0 up to (excluding) 3.0.22Reference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226 Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cdacfff557389abfa9e4615abded2ec984517d6c Types: PatchReference type added —OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-63076","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-25T14:37:28.943884Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedopenssl.org
Weakness type: CWE-476
Description added or changed
New references:- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226
and 2 more references
Show 9 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —OpenSSLDescription added —Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid pointer. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application acting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client talking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP message, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with X509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value pointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the expected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The parameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted. This happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so no knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is that PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from OSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP server accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP response validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The reliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure, no controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a specialized feature that an application must explicitly enable. FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-476Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45bReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570eReference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226Reference added —https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cdacfff557389abfa9e4615abded2ec984517d6cReference added —https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txtSource identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63076"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63076.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63076 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>