HighCVE-2026-63076

    Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)

    Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Msrc Update Guide, Debian LTS, CVE.org, BSI

    What is affected, what to do

    A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) message can cause an invalid pointer dereference due to a missing type check in the password-based protection verification.

    Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.2, OpenSSL to version 3.6.4, OpenSSL to version 3.5.8.

    Affected
    • OpenSSL lt 4.0.0..4.0.2
    • OpenSSL lt 3.6.0..3.6.4
    • OpenSSL lt 3.5.0..3.5.8
    • OpenSSL lt 3.4.0..3.4.7
    • OpenSSL lt 3.0.0..3.0.22
    Fixed in
    • OpenSSL 4.0.2
    • OpenSSL 3.6.4
    • OpenSSL 3.5.8
    • OpenSSL 3.4.7
    • OpenSSL 3.0.22

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    7.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Msrc Update Guide, Debian LTS, CVE.org, BSI

    1.6 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 75.7

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    107.83 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.5
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    1.6 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    75.7
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-476

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A crafted CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) message can cause an invalid pointer dereference due to a missing type check in the password-based protection verification. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash applications acting as a CMP server or client, resulting in a denial of service.

    Source: redhat_csaf, suse_csaf, Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian Security Advisories, Microsoft Security Update Guide, Debian LTS Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    OpenSSLOpenSSL
    • 3.6.0 – < 3.6.4
    • 3.4.0 – < 3.4.7
    • 4.0.0 – < 4.0.2
    • 3.5.0 – < 3.5.8
    • 3.0.0 – < 3.0.22
    • 3.6.4
    • 3.4.7
    • 4.0.2
    • 3.5.8
    • 3.0.22
    opensslopenssl
    • 3.5.0 – < 3.5.8
    • 3.4.0 – < 3.4.7
    • 4.0.0 – < 4.0.2
    • 3.6.0 – < 3.6.4
    • 3.0.0 – < 3.0.22
    • 3.5.8
    • 3.4.7
    • 4.0.2
    • 3.6.4
    • 3.0.22
    FreeBSD ProjectFreeBSD OS
    • < 15.1-STABLE
    • < 14.4-STABLE
    • < 15.0-RELEASE-p13
    • < 14.4-RELEASE-p9
    • < 15.1-RELEASE-p3
    • 15.1-STABLE
    • 14.4-STABLE
    • 15.0-RELEASE-p13
    • 14.4-RELEASE-p9
    • 15.1-RELEASE-p3
    MeinbergLANTIME
    • < V7.10.016
    • V7.10.016
    Open SourceOpenSSL
    • < 3.4.7
    • < 4.0.2
    • < 3.5.8
    • < 3.6.4
    • < 3.0.22
    • < 1.1.1zi
    • < 1.0.2zr
    • 3.4.7
    • 4.0.2
    • 3.5.8
    • 3.6.4
    • 3.0.22
    • 1.1.1zi
    • 1.0.2zr

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebianopensslbookworm
    Linuxdebianopenssltrixie
    Linuxubuntuopenssljammy
    Linuxubuntuopensslnoble
    Linuxubuntuopensslresolute

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-476NULL Pointer Dereference

      Base

      The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-476

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Initial analysis by NVDNVD

      Show 7 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Product configurationadded
      —
      OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.4 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.4.0 up to (excluding) 3.4.7 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.0.0 up to (excluding) 3.0.22
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259 Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226 Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cdacfff557389abfa9e4615abded2ec984517d6c Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt Types: Vendor Advisory

      Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes

      Show 2 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      CVSSadded
      —
      AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2026-63076","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-25T14:37:28.943884Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    3. Receivedopenssl.org

      Show 9 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      OpenSSL
      Descriptionadded
      —
      Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid pointer. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application acting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client talking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP message, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with X509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value pointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the expected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The parameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted. This happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so no knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is that PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from OSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP server accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP response validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The reliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure, no controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a specialized feature that an application must explicitly enable. FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-476
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7af46a92d0ce19a90e669ef56d2576a07924226
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cdacfff557389abfa9e4615abded2ec984517d6c
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt

      Source identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-63076
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63076"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63076.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63076 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>