HighCVE-2025-55752

    Intel(R) Ethernet 800 series: Relative Path Traversal (CVE-2025-55752)

    Published Sources: BSI

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. The fix for bug 60013 introduced a regression where the rewritten URL was normalized before it was decoded.

    An exploit is publicly available. Update libtiff to version 4.7.1, libxml2 to version 2.14.4, PostgreSQL to version 15.16.

    Affected
    • Apache Tomcat lte 11.0.0-M1..11.0.10
    • Apache Tomcat lte 10.1.0-M1..10.1.44
    • Apache Tomcat lte 9.0.0.M11..9.0.108
    • Apache Tomcat lte 8.5.6..8.5.100

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: BSI

    64.4 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.24

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    77.02 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    PoC (publicly reported)
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.5
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    64.4 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.24
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 28 October 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-23

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. The fix for bug 60013 introduced a regression where the rewritten URL was normalized before it was decoded. This introduced the possibility that, for rewrite rules that rewrite query parameters to the URL, an attacker could manipulate the request URI to bypass security constraints including the protection for /WEB-INF/ and /META-INF/. If PUT requests were also enabled then malicious files could be uploaded leading to remote code execution. PUT requests are normally limited to trusted users and it is considered unlikely that PUT requests would be enabled in conjunction with a rewrite that manipulated the URI. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.10, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.44, from 9.0.0.M11 through 9.0.108. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.6 though 8.5.100. Other, older, EOL versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.11 or later, 10.1.45 or later or 9.0.109 or later, which fix the issue.

    Source: BSI WID Portal

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    —Intel(R) Ethernet 800 series
    • before version 2.3.14
    • —
    —libtiff
    • < 4.7.1
    • 4.7.1
    —libxml2
    • 2.14.0
    • 2.14.1
    • 2.14.2
    • 2.14.3
    • 2.14.4
    • 2.14.5
    • < 2.14.4
    • < 2.14.5
    • < 2.15.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • 2.14.4
    • 2.14.5
    • 2.15.0
    —PostgreSQL
    • 15 – < 15.16
    • 16 – < 16.12
    • 17 – < 17.8
    • 18 – < 18.2
    • < 14.21
    • 15.16
    • 16.12
    • 17.8
    • 18.2
    • 14.21
    Apache Software FoundationApache HTTP Server
    • 2.4.0 – ≤ 2.4.65
    • 2.4.30 – < 2.4.66
    • 2.4.7 – ≤ 2.4.65
    • < 2.4.66
    • —
    • 2.4.66
    • —
    • 2.4.66
    Apache Software FoundationApache Log4j Core
    • 2.0-beta9 – < 2.25.3
    • 3.0.0-alpha1 – ≤ 3.0.0-beta3
    • 2.25.3
    • —
    Apache Software FoundationApache Tomcat
    • 10.1.0 – ≤ 10.1.41
    • 10.1.0-M1 – ≤ 10.1.41
    • 10.1.0-M1 – ≤ 10.1.42
    • 10.1.0-M1 – ≤ 10.1.43
    • 10.1.0-M1 – ≤ 10.1.44
    • 11.0.0-M1 – ≤ 11.0.10
    • 11.0.0-M1 – ≤ 11.0.7
    • 11.0.0-M1 – ≤ 11.0.8
    • 11.0.0-M1 – ≤ 11.0.9
    • 7.0.95 – ≤ 7.0.109
    • 8.5.0 – ≤ 8.5.100
    • 8.5.44 – ≤ 8.5.100
    • 8.5.6 – ≤ 8.5.100
    • 8.5.60 – ≤ 8.5.100
    • 9.0.0.M1 – ≤ 9.0.105
    • 9.0.0.M1 – ≤ 9.0.106
    • 9.0.0.M1 – ≤ 9.0.107
    • 9.0.0.M11 – ≤ 9.0.108
    • 9.0.23 – ≤ 9.0.105
    • 9.0.40 – ≤ 9.0.108
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    Connect2idNimbus JOSE+JWT
    • < 10.0.2
    • 10.0.2
    curlcurl
    • 7.10
    • 7.10.1
    • 7.10.2
    • 7.10.3
    • 7.10.4
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    Distribution and container packages (12)

    Downstream packages (e.g. Bitnami, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat). Versions refer to the distribution, not the vendor.

    Distribution and container packages
    Affected versionsFixed in
    bitnamijre
    • 1.9.0
    • —
    bitnamipostgresql
    • 15.0.0
    • 16.0.0
    • 17.0.0
    • 18.0.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    bitnamipython-min
    • 3.11.0
    • 3.12.0
    • 3.13.0
    • 3.14.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    bitnamitomcat
    • 10.0.0
    • 11.0.0
    • —
    • —
    From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (324)

    Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.

    Products from bundled advisories
    Affected versionsFixed in
    ABBAC-500
    • v3 3.90
    • —
    AbsoluteSecure Access
    • < 13.56
    • < 14.20
    • 13.56
    • 14.20
    AbsoluteSecure Access Insights
    • < 4.30
    • 4.30
    AbsoluteSecure Access Server
    • < 14.10
    • 14.10
    AmazonCorretto
    • < 11.0.30.7.1
    • < 8.482.08.1
    • 11.0.30.7.1
    • 8.482.08.1
    ApacheHTTP Server
    • < 2.4.66
    • 2.4.66
    ApacheTomcat
    • < 10.1.42
    • < 10.1.44
    • < 10.1.47
    • < 11.0.10
    • < 11.0.12
    • < 11.0.8
    • < 9.0.106
    • < 9.0.107
    • < 9.0.108
    • < 9.0.110
    • 10.1.42
    • 10.1.44
    • 10.1.47
    • 11.0.10
    • 11.0.12
    • 11.0.8
    • 9.0.106
    • 9.0.107
    • 9.0.108
    • 9.0.110
    AppleiOS
    • < 18.7.10
    • < 18.7.7
    • < 26.4
    • < 26.6
    • < 26.6.1
    • 18.7.10
    • 18.7.7
    • 26.4
    • 26.6
    • 26.6.1
    AppleiPadOS
    • < 18.7.10
    • < 18.7.7
    • < 26.4
    • < 26.6
    • < 26.6.1
    • 18.7.10
    • 18.7.7
    • 26.4
    • 26.6
    • 26.6.1
    ApplemacOS Tahoe
    • < 26.6.2
    • 26.6.2
    AtlassianBamboo
    • <10.2.12 (LTS)
    • <10.2.7 LTS
    • < 10.2.8
    • < 11.0.4
    • < 11.0.5
    • < 12.0.2
    • <9.6.16 LTS
    • < 9.6.17
    • <9.6.20 (LTS)
    • —
    • —
    • 10.2.8
    • 11.0.4
    • 11.0.5
    • 12.0.2
    • —
    • 9.6.17
    • —
    AtlassianBitbucket
    • < 10.0.2
    • <8.19.21 LTS
    • <8.19.25 (LTS)
    • <9.4.13 (LTS)
    • <9.4.9 LTS
    • < 9.6.5
    • 10.0.2
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • 9.6.5
    AtlassianJira
    • < 10.3.12
    • <10.3.8 (LTS)
    • < 10.3.9
    • < 10.7.2
    • 10.3.12
    • —
    • 10.3.9
    • 10.7.2

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebianapache-log4j2bullseye
    Linuxdebianapache2bullseye
    Linuxdebiandebian_linux10.0
    Linuxdebiandebian_linux11.0
    Linuxdebiandebian_linux9.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux7.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux10.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux8.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux6.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux9.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus8.4
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus10.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus9.4
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus8.8
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus9.6
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_eus8.6
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_6410.0_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_649.0_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_648.0_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_649.4_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus10.0_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus9.4_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus9.6_aarch64
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems8.0_s390x

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-23Relative Path Traversal

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize sequences such as ".." that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-23

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)tomcat85-check (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • gpg.failformfeed
    • news.ycombinator.comitem?id=46404339
    • media.ccc.dev/39c3-to-sign-or-not-to-sign-practical-vulnerabilities-i
    • github.compython/cpython/issues/143921report, Issue tracking
    • github.compython/cpython/pull/143922web, Patch
    • mail.python.orgarchives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/DD7C7JZJYTBXM…advisory, Vendor advisory
    • github.compython/cpython/commit/6262704b134db2a4ba12e85ecfbd968534f28b45fix, Patch
    • github.compython/cpython/commit/d0921efb665aff26b378f495e5ff84f7e3fe649dfix, Patch
    • github.compython/cpython/commit/f2cd7ef89aa8a0dcbc7283bbd39548b76f2a736afix, Patch
    • github.compython/cpython/commit/298182272a740ce2016aee2f54acbd0bba1944c1fix, Patch
    • github.compython/cpython/commit/71926d943c05bde79bd2a866933103541d91b6a2fix, Patch
    • dell.comsupport/kbdoc/en-us/000481268/dsa-2026-278-security-update-for-…Vendor advisory, Vendor advisory
    • go.devcl/725920fix, Patch
    • go.devissue/76445report, Issue tracking, Patch
    • groups.google.comg/golang-announce/c/8FJoBkPddm4web, Mailing list, Release notes
    • pkg.go.devvuln/GO-2025-4155Vendor advisory
    • NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61729web
    • dell.comsupport/kbdoc/en-us/000481268/dsa-2026-278-security-update-for-…Vendor advisory, Vendor advisory
    • curl.sejson
    • curl.sewww

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    One NVD translation into another language is hidden.

    Linked CVEs

    Linked CVEs
    HighCVE-2026-56086Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Incorrect Authorization8.8—
    LowCVE-2026-56085Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Use of Uninitialized Resource3.3—
    MediumCVE-2026-56084Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)5.8—
    MediumCVE-2026-54483Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection6.7—
    CriticalCVE-2026-53483Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Improper Authentication9.8—
    HighCVE-2026-53482Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Integer Overflow or Wraparound7.5—
    CriticalCVE-2026-53481Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Path Traversal9.8—
    LowCVE-2026-53480Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Path Traversal2.7—
    HighCVE-2026-53479Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection7.2—
    HighCVE-2026-53478Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection7.2—
    HighCVE-2026-49815Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection7.2—
    HighCVE-2026-49814Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection7.2—
    MediumCVE-2026-49813Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection6.7—
    MediumCVE-2026-46730Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Incorrect Authorization4.2—
    MediumCVE-2026-46468Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Link Following4.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-46467Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File5.8—
    LowCVE-2026-46466Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Use of Less Trusted Source2.7—
    MediumCVE-2026-46465Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String5.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-46464Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Link Following4.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-46463Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Integer Overflow or Wraparound6.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-44269Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Link Following4.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-44268Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource4.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-41124Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Path Traversal4.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-41123Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Improper Access Control4.3—
    Show 121 more CVEs
    Linked CVEs
    HighCVE-2026-41122Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Cross-site Scripting7.1—
    MediumCVE-2026-3784wrong proxy connection reuse with credentials6.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-3783token leak with redirect and netrc5.3—
    LowCVE-2026-32778libexpat Project libexpat: NULL Pointer Dereference2.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-32777libexpat Project libexpat: Infinite Loop4.0—
    MediumCVE-2026-32776libexpat Project libexpat: NULL Pointer Dereference4.0—
    MediumCVE-2026-27171zlib: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input5.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-26355Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: OS Command Injection6.5—
    HighCVE-2026-25646LIBPNG has a heap buffer overflow in png_set_quantize8.1—
    HighCVE-2026-25210libexpat Project libexpat: Integer Overflow or Wraparound7.8—
    LowCVE-2026-24515libexpat Project libexpat: NULL Pointer Dereference2.9—
    HighCVE-2026-24049wheel Allows Arbitrary File Permission Modification via Path Traversal7.1—
    HighCVE-2026-23490pyasn1 has a DoS vulnerability in decoder7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-22801LIBPNG has an integer truncation causing heap buffer over-read in png_image_write_*7.8—
    MediumCVE-2026-22796ASN1_TYPE Type Confusion in the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function5.3—
    MediumCVE-2026-22795Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in PKCS#12 parsing5.5—
    HighCVE-2026-22695Pnggroup Libpng: Out-of-bounds Read7.1—
    HighCVE-2026-22184zlib <= 1.3.1.2 untgz Global Buffer Overflow in TGZfname()7.8—
    HighCVE-2026-21441Urllib3: Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-2007PostgreSQL pg_trgm heap buffer overflow writes pattern onto server memory8.2—
    HighCVE-2026-2006PostgreSQL missing validation of multibyte character length executes arbitrary code8.8—
    HighCVE-2026-2005PostgreSQL pgcrypto heap buffer overflow executes arbitrary code8.8—
    HighCVE-2026-2004PostgreSQL: Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input8.8—
    MediumCVE-2026-2003PostgreSQL oidvector discloses a few bytes of memory4.3—
    MediumCVE-2026-1965bad reuse of HTTP Negotiate connection6.5—
    LowCVE-2026-1703Limited path traversal when installing wheel archives——
    MediumCVE-2026-1299email BytesGenerator header injection due to unquoted newlines——
    HighCVE-2026-0915getnetbyaddr and getnetbyaddr_r leak stack contents to DNS resovler7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-0865wsgiref.headers.Headers allows header newline injection——
    HighCVE-2026-0861Integer overflow in memalign leads to heap corruption8.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-0672Header injection in http.cookies.Morsel——
    HighCVE-2025-9900Libtiff: libtiff write-what-where8.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-9714Stack overflow in libxml26.2—
    HighCVE-2025-9230Out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK Unwrap7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-9086Out of bounds read for cookie path7.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-8732libxml2 xmlcatalog xmlParseSGMLCatalog recursion3.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-8058The GNU C Library Glibc: Double Free——
    HighCVE-2025-7546GNU Binutils elf.c bfd_elf_set_group_contents out-of-bounds write7.8—
    HighCVE-2025-7545GNU Binutils objcopy.c copy_section heap-based overflow7.8—
    LowCVE-2025-7039Glib: buffer under-read on glib through glib/gfileutils.c via get_tmp_file()3.7—
    HighCVE-2025-69421NULL Pointer Dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex function7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-69420Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-69419Out of bounds write in PKCS12_get_friendlyname() UTF-8 conversion7.4—
    MediumCVE-2025-69418Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls4.0—
    HighCVE-2025-68973GnuPG: Multiple Operations on Resource in Single-Operation Context7.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-68972GnuPG: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature5.9—
    CriticalCVE-2025-6897D-Link DI-7300G+ httpd_debug.asp os command injection9.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-68161Apache Log4j Core: Missing TLS hostname verification in Socket appender4.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-68160Heap out-of-bounds write in BIO_f_linebuffer on short writes4.7—
    HighCVE-2025-66471urllib3 Streaming API improperly handles highly compressed data7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-66418urllib3 allows an unbounded number of links in the decompression chain7.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-66382libexpat Project libexpat: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity5.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-66200Apache HTTP Server: mod_userdir+suexec bypass via AllowOverride FileInfo5.4—
    CriticalCVE-2025-66034fontTools is Vulnerable to Arbitrary File Write and XML injection in fontTools.varLib9.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-65082Apache HTTP Server: CGI environment variable override6.5—
    HighCVE-2025-61729Go standard library Crypto/x509: security vulnerability7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-61725Excessive CPU consumption in ParseAddress in net/mail7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-61723Quadratic complexity when parsing some invalid inputs in encoding/pem7.5—
    LowCVE-2025-6170Libxml2: stack buffer overflow in xmllint interactive shell command handling2.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-6075Quadratic complexity in os.path.expandvars() with user-controlled template5.5—
    HighCVE-2025-6021Libxml2: integer overflow in xmlbuildqname() leads to stack buffer overflow in libxml27.5—
    HighCVE-2025-59775Apache HTTP Server: NTLM Leakage on Windows through UNC SSRF7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-59375libexpat Project libexpat: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-58188Panic when validating certificates with DSA public keys in crypto/x5097.5—
    HighCVE-2025-58187Quadratic complexity when checking name constraints in crypto/x5097.5—
    HighCVE-2025-58098Apache HTTP Server: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data8.3—
    CriticalCVE-2025-55754Apache Tomcat: console manipulation via escape sequences in log messages9.6—
    HighCVE-2025-55753Apache HTTP Server: mod_md (ACME), unintended retry intervals7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-55752Apache Tomcat: Directory traversal via rewrite with possible RCE if PUT is enabled7.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-55668Apache Tomcat: session fixation via rewrite valve6.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-53864Connect2id Nimbus JOSE+JWT: Uncontrolled Recursion5.8—
    HighCVE-2025-53506Apache Tomcat: DoS via excessive h2 streams at connection start7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-52520Apache Tomcat: DoS via integer overflow in multipart file upload7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-5245GNU Binutils objdump debug.c debug_type_samep memory corruption7.8—
    HighCVE-2025-5244GNU Binutils ld elflink.c elf_gc_sweep memory corruption7.8—
    HighCVE-2025-52434Apache Tomcat: APR/Native Connector crash leading to DoS7.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-50181urllib3 redirects are not disabled when retries are disabled on PoolManager instantiation6.1—
    CriticalCVE-2025-49796Libxml: type confusion leads to denial of service (dos)9.1—
    HighCVE-2025-49795Libxml: null pointer dereference leads to denial of service (dos)7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-49125Apache Tomcat: Security constraint bypass for pre/post-resources7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-49124Apache Tomcat: exe side-loading via icalcs.exe in Tomcat installer for Windows8.4—
    HighCVE-2025-48989Apache Tomcat: h2 DoS - Made You Reset7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-48988Apache Tomcat: FileUpload large number of parts with headers DoS7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-47273Pypa Setuptools: Path Traversal8.8—
    Not ratedCVE-2025-46642Vulnerability CVE-2025-46642——
    HighCVE-2025-35036hibernate-validator insecure default Expression Language interpolation7.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-3198GNU Binutils objdump bucomm.c display_info memory leak5.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-27723Intel(R) Ethernet 800 series: Use After Free——
    HighCVE-2025-24855XMLSoft libxslt: Use After Free7.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-15367POP3 command injection in user-controlled commands——
    MediumCVE-2025-15366IMAP command injection in user-controlled commands——
    MediumCVE-2025-15282Header injection via newlines in data URL mediatype——
    HighCVE-2025-15281wordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory7.5—
    LowCVE-2025-15224libssh key passphrase bypass without agent set3.1—
    MediumCVE-2025-15079libssh global known_hosts override5.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-14819OpenSSL partial chain store policy bypass5.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-14524bearer token leak on cross-protocol redirect5.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-14017broken TLS options for threaded LDAPS6.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-13837Out-of-memory when loading Plist5.5—
    HighCVE-2025-13836Excessive read buffering DoS in http.client7.5—
    HighCVE-2025-1372GNU elfutils eu-readelf readelf.c print_string_section buffer overflow7.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-12781base64.b64decode() always accepts "+/" characters, despite setting altchars5.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-12084Quadratic complexity in node ID cache clearing5.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-1182GNU Binutils ld elflink.c bfd_elf_reloc_symbol_deleted_p memory corruption5.0—
    MediumCVE-2025-1181GNU Binutils ld elflink.c _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec memory corruption5.0—
    HighCVE-2025-1179GNU Binutils ld libbfd.c bfd_putl64 memory corruption7.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-1178GNU Binutils ld libbfd.c bfd_putl64 memory corruption5.6—
    MediumCVE-2025-1176GNU Binutils ld elflink.c _bfd_elf_gc_mark_rsec heap-based overflow5.0—
    MediumCVE-2025-11563wcurl path traversal with percent-encoded slashes4.6—
    LowCVE-2025-1149GNU Binutils ld xmalloc.c xstrdup memory leak3.1—
    MediumCVE-2025-11468Folding email comments of unfoldable characters doesn't preserve parenthesis——
    MediumCVE-2025-11414GNU Binutils Linker elflink.c get_link_hash_entry out-of-bounds5.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-11413GNU Binutils Linker elflink.c elf_link_add_object_symbols out-of-bounds5.5—
    MediumCVE-2025-11412GNU Binutils Linker elflink.c bfd_elf_gc_record_vtentry out-of-bounds5.5—
    HighCVE-2025-11083GNU Binutils Linker elfcode.h elf_swap_shdr heap-based overflow7.8—
    MediumCVE-2025-10966missing SFTP host verification with wolfSSH4.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-10158Rsync: Out of bounds array access via negative index4.3—
    MediumCVE-2025-10148predictable WebSocket mask5.3—
    HighCVE-2025-0840GNU Binutils objdump.c disassemble_bytes stack-based overflow7.5—
    HighCVE-2022-28948Yaml: Deserialization of Untrusted Data7.5—
    HighCVE-2022-24903Buffer overflow in TCP syslog server (receiver) components in rsyslog8.1—
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-55752
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-55752"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-55752.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-55752 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>