MediumCVE-2026-75806

    Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (CVE-2026-75806)

    Published Last modified Sources: SUSE, CVE.org, Red Hat, Ubuntu, Debian, Debian LTS, Msrc Update Guide, BSI

    What is affected, what to do

    A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by terminating an active Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) session.

    Update OpenSSL to version 4.0.3, OpenSSL to version 3.6.5, OpenSSL to version 3.5.9.

    Affected
    • OpenSSL lt 4.0.0..4.0.3
    • OpenSSL lt 3.6.0..3.6.5
    • OpenSSL lt 3.5.0..3.5.9
    • OpenSSL lt 3.4.0..3.4.8
    • OpenSSL lt 3.0.0..3.0.23
    • OpenSSL lt 1.1.1..1.1.1zj
    Fixed in
    • OpenSSL 4.0.3
    • OpenSSL 3.6.5
    • OpenSSL 3.5.9
    • OpenSSL 3.4.8
    • OpenSSL 3.0.23
    • OpenSSL 1.1.1zj

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    5.3

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    5.3

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: SUSE, CVE.org, Red Hat, Ubuntu, Debian, Debian LTS, Msrc Update Guide, BSI

    1.1 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 65.7

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Medium
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    90.99 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    5.3 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    5.3
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    1.1 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    65.7
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: partial
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 29 September 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-1284

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A flaw was found in OpenSSL. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by terminating an active Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) session. By sending an undersized network packet that is shorter than the expected cryptographic overhead, the record processing layer fails to validate the packet length and misinterprets the packet as an internal error rather than an authentication failure. This improper handling triggers a fatal alert that unexpectedly closes the targeted connection without requiring valid encryption keys.

    Source: suse_csaf, cvelistv5, redhat_csaf, NVD (NIST), Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian Security Advisories, Debian LTS Advisories, Microsoft Security Update Guide, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    OpenSSLOpenSSL
    • 3.4.0 – < 3.4.8
    • 3.5.0 – < 3.5.9
    • 3.6.0 – < 3.6.5
    • 1.1.1 – < 1.1.1zj
    • 3.0.0 – < 3.0.23
    • 4.0.0 – < 4.0.3
    • 3.4.8
    • 3.5.9
    • 3.6.5
    • 1.1.1zj
    • 3.0.23
    • 4.0.3
    opensslopenssl
    • 4.0.0 – < 4.0.3
    • 3.5.0 – < 3.5.9
    • 3.0.0 – < 3.0.23
    • 3.6.0 – < 3.6.5
    • 3.4.0 – < 3.4.8
    • 1.1.1 – < 1.1.1zj
    • 4.0.3
    • 3.5.9
    • 3.0.23
    • 3.6.5
    • 3.4.8
    • 1.1.1zj
    Open SourceOpenSSL
    • < 1.1.1zj
    • < 1.0.2zs
    • < 3.4.8
    • < 3.6.5
    • < 3.5.9
    • < 3.0.23
    • < 4.0.3
    • 1.1.1zj
    • 1.0.2zs
    • 3.4.8
    • 3.6.5
    • 3.5.9
    • 3.0.23
    • 4.0.3

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebianopensslbookworm
    Linuxdebianopenssltrixie

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-1284Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input

      Base

      The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-1284

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Initial analysis by NVDNVD

      Show 6 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Product configurationadded
      —
      OR *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.4.0 up to (excluding) 3.4.8 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.5.0 up to (excluding) 3.5.9 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.6.0 up to (excluding) 3.6.5 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.0.3 *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 1.1.1 up to (excluding) 1.1.1zj *cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 3.0.0 up to (excluding) 3.0.23
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/04728a289a823e68137f88da016cb9ede307217d Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/050b275cd671a6eed1d6457642d41a5a77aab972 Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3a4589d015a9049d47b66f186cf50a8711343a1d Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5af82fefbaf2b5fec2fc0e1d87f112844902f01d Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      OpenSSL Software Foundation: https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt Types: Vendor Advisory

      Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes

      Show 2 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      CVSSadded
      —
      AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2026-75806","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-29T16:52:47.298458Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    3. Receivedopenssl.org

      Show 8 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Descriptionadded
      —
      Issue summary: An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite can be terminated by a single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag overhead. Impact summary: An attacker who can send a datagram that is routed to an existing DTLS 1.2 association can tear that association down without knowing any key material. This is a Denial of Service limited to the targeted association. There is no memory safety or confidentiality impact. CWE: CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input Description: In TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 every record protected by an AEAD cipher suite carries an explicit IV followed by the ciphertext and an authentication tag. When decrypting such a record the record layer passed the record length to the cipher implementation before checking that the record was long enough to contain the explicit IV and the tag. For a record shorter than that overhead the cipher implementation rejected the impossible length, and the record layer treated this as an internal failure and raised a fatal internal_error alert instead of treating the record as one that failed authentication. In TLS 1.2 the same record causes a fatal internal_error alert instead of the expected bad_record_mac alert. Since any undecryptable record already terminates a TLS connection, this is a protocol conformance issue rather than a security issue in TLS. The fix validates the record length against the explicit IV and tag length before any AEAD processing, so that TLS reports bad_record_mac and DTLS silently discards the record. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-1284
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/75xxx/CVE-2026-75806.json">CVE-2026-75806</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/04728a289a823e68137f88da016cb9ede307217d
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/050b275cd671a6eed1d6457642d41a5a77aab972
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3a4589d015a9049d47b66f186cf50a8711343a1d
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5af82fefbaf2b5fec2fc0e1d87f112844902f01d
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt

      Source identifier: openssl-security@openssl.org

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-75806
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-75806"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-75806.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-75806 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>