CriticalCVE-2026-73570

    Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) OS Command Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2026-73570)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT

    What is affected, what to do

    An OS command injection vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) prior to version 10.1.20 allows an unauthenticated attacker to send specially crafted SMTP requests, potentially executing arbitrary OS commands as the Zimbra user. This vulnerability is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since 2026. Affected systems have the optional zimbra-snmp package installed with SNMP notifications enabled. Immediate patching to version 10.1.20 or higher is critical to mitigate the risk.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Zimbra Collaboration to version 10.1.20. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Zimbra Collaboration lt *..10.1.20
    Fixed in
    • Zimbra Collaboration 10.1.20

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.9

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    8.9

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT

    71.7 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.42

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    246.88 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CSA/SingCERT How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.9 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.9
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    71.7 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.42
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-78

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and gives code execution with impact beyond the vulnerable component. The higher attack complexity comes only from the precondition that zimbra-snmp is installed with notifications enabled. Where that precondition holds, this sits among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Internet-facing Zimbra servers are a recurring target for mass scanning, webshell implants and mailbox harvesting. CISA does not flag ransomware use, but exposed nodes with the SNMP package active should still be treated as critical and patched or mitigated within 24 hours. Nodes without zimbra-snmp carry lower urgency and can be upgraded in the regular cycle.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Scope the exposure: On every ZCS node (MTA nodes first), check whether the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed (rpm -qa | grep zimbra-snmp or dpkg -l | grep zimbra-snmp) and whether SNMP notifications are enabled (e.g. su - zimbra -c "zmprov gcf zimbraSnmpNotify"; confirm the attribute name for your release). Only that combination is vulnerable according to the advisory.
      • Patch: Upgrade to ZCS 10.1.20 or later. NVD lists all versions before 10.1.20 as affected. Check the Synacor/Zimbra vendor advisory and release notes to confirm, since the CPE entry is inconsistent with the NVD description.
      • If you cannot upgrade today: Disable SNMP notifications (zmprov mcf zimbraSnmpNotify FALSE, then zmcontrol restart) or remove the zimbra-snmp package if no monitoring depends on it.
      • Compromise assessment: The attack surface is unauthenticated SMTP (25/tcp), so review every exposed node for unexpected process trees, zimbra user cron jobs (crontab -l -u zimbra), ~zimbra/.ssh/authorized_keys, and webshells under /opt/zimbra/jetty*/webapps/.
      • On any hit: Isolate the node, take a forensic image, then rotate LDAP, MySQL and admin credentials (zmlocalconfig -s) and TLS keys, and invalidate admin sessions.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration: Run zimbra-snmp only where it is operationally required. Move SNMP monitoring to external agents such as node_exporter or a Zabbix agent instead.
      • Network segmentation: Keep ZCS in a dedicated DMZ. Restrict outbound traffic from mail servers to what they need (SMTP relay, update repositories) so attackers cannot fetch payloads or open reverse shells.
      • Upstream mail gateway / IPS: Filter shell metacharacters ($(, backticks, ${IFS}, ;, |, &&) in the SMTP envelope (MAIL FROM, RCPT TO) and in headers. Suricata idea: alert smtp any any -> $ZIMBRA_MTA 25 (msg:"Possible Zimbra SNMP command injection"; content:"RCPT TO"; nocase; pcre:"/(\$\(||${IFS})/"; sid:...)`.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use AppArmor, SELinux or an EDR policy to block zimbra-owned processes from launching curl, wget, nc or python with outbound network connections.
      • Least privilege: Audit the zimbra user's sudo rights (sudo -l -U zimbra) and remove anything unnecessary, because escalation to root is the expected next step.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • auditd: Track execve events with uid=zimbra (or auid) for /bin/sh, /bin/bash, curl, wget, base64 and nc. Rule: -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S execve -F uid=<zimbra-uid> -k zimbra_exec.
      • EDR process ancestry: Alert on a Zimbra Perl or Java process under /opt/zimbra/ (log-watch or SNMP notification components) → sh -c → network tool. Sigma shape: ParentImage|contains: '/opt/zimbra/' AND Image|endswith: ['/sh','/bash','/curl','/wget'] AND User: zimbra.
      • MTA logs: Search /var/log/zimbra.log or /var/log/mail.log for sender or recipient addresses that contain shell syntax. SPL: index=mail sourcetype=postfix ("$(" OR "${IFS}" OR "")`.
      • Zeek / network: Check smtp.log for anomalous rcptto and mailfrom values. Correlate with first-seen outbound connections from mail servers in conn.log, especially HTTP/HTTPS and high ports.
      • Filesystem: Alert via FIM or auditd on new .jsp files under /opt/zimbra/jetty*/webapps/ and on changes to the zimbra crontab or authorized_keys (-w /opt/zimbra/jetty_base/webapps -p wa -k zimbra_web).

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user.

    Source: pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CSA/SingCERT

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    ZimbraCollaboration
    • < 10.1.20
    • 10.1.20
    synacorzimbra_collaboration_suite
    • < 10.1.20
    • 10.1.20

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-78Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

      Base

      The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-78

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    CSA/SingCERTHigh-Severity Vulnerability in Zimbra Collaboration Suite (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERTactively exploited
    CIRCL Sightingsblog.securelayer7.net (opens in a new tab)PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)zimbra-cve-2026-73570-ir (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)Zimbra-CVE-2026-73570-Rules (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-73570 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • wiki.zimbra.comSynacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) — CVE-2026-73570pwn-watch
    • wiki.zimbra.comwiki/Security_Center
    • moje.cert.plkomunikaty/2026/145/aktywnie-wykorzystywana-podatnosc-w-zimbra-…Third-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-73570government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS): Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) OS Command Injection Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-73570pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-73570","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-13T00:00:00+00:00"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-73570","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-22T03:55:17.911879Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-73570","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-21T17:18:39.211103Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-73570","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-13T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Linked advisories

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-73570
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-73570"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-73570.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-73570 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>