Erlang OTP: Comparison Using Wrong Factors (CVE-2026-48860)
Published Last modified Sources: SUSE, Debian, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, OSV
What is affected, what to do
Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address.
Update erlang\/otp to version 27.3.4.13, erlang\/ssl to version 11.2.12.9, Erlang/OTP to version 29.0.2.
- Affected
- Erlang OTP
gte 26.0..* - Erlang OTP
gte 11.0..*
- Erlang OTP
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v4
6.5
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: SUSE, Debian, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, OSV
0.2 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 11.2
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 57.22 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 6.5
CVSS v4
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.2 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 11.2
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 June 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-863, CWE-1025
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before OTP 27.3.4.13, OTP 28.5.0.2, and OTP 29.0.2, corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.2.12.9, 11.6.0.2, and 11.7.2.
Source: suse_csaf, Debian Security Advisories, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), CVE.org (MITRE), cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Erlang | OTP |
|
|
| erlang | erlang\/otp |
|
|
| erlang | erlang\/ssl |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP erl_interface |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP erts |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP ftp |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP inets |
|
|
| Open Source | Erlang/OTP ssh |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | erlang | trixie |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-863Incorrect Authorization
Class
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Entry at MITRE CWE-863CWE-1025Comparison Using Wrong Factors
Base
The code performs a comparison between two entities, but the comparison examines the wrong factors or characteristics of the entities, which can lead to incorrect results and resultant weaknesses.
Entry at MITRE CWE-1025
References & sources
- github.comerlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cvadvisory, Vendor advisory, related, Vendor advisory
- cna.erlef.orgEEF CNA record for CVE-2026-48860web, related, Third-party advisory
- erlang.orgErlang/OTP version orderingweb, x_version-scheme, Product
- github.comFix commit 0209a6d in erlang/otpfix, Patch, Patch
- OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)OSV record EEF-CVE-2026-48860related, Third-party advisory
- github.comIntroducing commit 7a08c55 in erlang/otpweb, related
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedEEF
Description added or changed
New references:- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.html
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/7a08c5507862a7011568506d0c17b1fdef30bee4
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv
and 2 more references
Show 18 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description changed Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before OTP 29.0.2, OTP 28.5.0.2 and OTP 27.3.4.13, corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.7.2, 11.6.0.2 and 11.2.12.9.Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before OTP 27.3.4.13, OTP 28.5.0.2, and OTP 29.0.2, corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.2.12.9, 11.6.0.2, and 11.7.2.Affected versions (publisher) added —Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/48xxx/CVE-2026-48860.json">CVE-2026-48860</a>Reference added —https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.htmlReference added —https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4Reference added —https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/7a08c5507862a7011568506d0c17b1fdef30bee4Reference added —https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cvReference added —https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48860Reference added —https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versionsReference removed https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.html—Reference removed https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4—Reference removed https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv—Reference removed https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48860—Reference removed https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions—Reference type removed https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.html Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4 Types: Patch—Reference type removed https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv Types: Vendor Advisory—Reference type removed https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48860 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions Types: Product—Source identifier: 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
Record modifiedEEF
Description added or changed
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description changed Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before 29.0.2, 28.5.0.2 and 27.3.4.13 corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.7.2, 11.6.0.2 and 11.2.12.9.Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before OTP 29.0.2, OTP 28.5.0.2 and OTP 27.3.4.13, corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.7.2, 11.6.0.2 and 11.2.12.9.Source identifier: 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- erlang/otp (28.0 – before 28.5.0.2; 29.0 – before 29.0.2; 26.0 – before 27.3.4.13)
- erlang/ssl (11.0 – before 11.2.12.9; 11.6 – before 11.6.0.2; 11.7 – before 11.7.2)
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NProduct configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 28.0 up to (excluding) 28.5.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 29.0 up to (excluding) 29.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/otp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 26.0 up to (excluding) 27.3.4.13 *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/ssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 11.0 up to (excluding) 11.2.12.9 *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/ssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 11.6 up to (excluding) 11.6.0.2 *cpe:2.3:a:erlang:erlang/ssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 11.7 up to (excluding) 11.7.2Reference type added —EEF: https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.html Types: Third Party AdvisoryReference type added —EEF: https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4 Types: PatchReference type added —EEF: https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv Types: Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —EEF: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48860 Types: Third Party AdvisoryReference type added —EEF: https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions Types: ProductSource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
ReceivedEEF
CVSS V4.0: AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness type: CWE-1025, CWE-863
Description added or changed
Show 9 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before 29.0.2, 28.5.0.2 and 27.3.4.13 corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.7.2, 11.6.0.2 and 11.2.12.9.CVSS added —AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-1025Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-863Reference added —https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-48860.htmlReference added —https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0209a6df65d605552b378273027b3968b35f26b4Reference added —https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cvReference added —https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-48860Reference added —https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versionsSource identifier: 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-48860"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-48860.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-48860 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>