Google Chrome: Code Execution (CVE-2026-3910)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, Debian
What is affected, what to do
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.75 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
Conflicting version data — version display is hidden until the data is resolved.
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, Debian
2.7 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 85.9
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 218.06 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 2.7 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 85.9
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 13 March 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-119
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw is network-reachable without authentication and only requires a user to open a crafted page — via a phishing link, malvertising or a compromised site (watering hole). In practice, V8 bugs like this serve as the first stage of an exploit chain: code execution in the renderer, then a sandbox escape. Attackers favour targets with high-value access, such as administrators, executives, developers and journalists. CISA does not flag known ransomware use. The statistical exploitation likelihood is currently rated moderate, but KEV listing confirms real-world attacks, and the browser is the largest attack surface on virtually every workstation. Treat this as high priority: patch fleet-wide within 24-72 hours, and immediately on privileged and KRITIS-relevant workstations.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Update Google Chrome to 146.0.7680.75 or later on all managed endpoints (Windows, macOS, Linux). Updating alone is not enough: the browser must restart before the fix takes effect. Force the relaunch via policy (
RelaunchNotification= 2, with a shortRelaunchNotificationPeriod). - Patch Debian hosts: upgrade
chromiumto 146.0.7680.80-1deb12u1 (Bookworm) or 146.0.7680.80-1deb13u1 (Trixie), e.g. withapt update && apt install --only-upgrade chromium. For other distributions, check their security trackers for fixed package versions. - Microsoft Edge, Opera, Brave and other Chromium-based browsers: a patch is available from each vendor — look up the version in the vendor advisory (for Edge, the Microsoft Security Update Guide or Edge release notes). Then push the update and enforce a restart via Intune, GPO or Jamf.
- Pull a version inventory: identify every host running Chrome below 146.0.7680.75. Fix privileged users first (domain admins, finance, OT engineering workstations), along with jump hosts.
- Hunt for user-installed and portable browsers: Chrome under
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Google\Chrome\Applicationin particular often bypasses central patch management. Find these installs and remove or update them.
- Update Google Chrome to 146.0.7680.75 or later on all managed endpoints (Windows, macOS, Linux). Updating alone is not enough: the browser must restart before the fix takes effect. Force the relaunch via policy (
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Configuration/browser hardening: until restarts complete, restrict V8 JIT through policy. In Chrome, set
DefaultJavaScriptJitSetting= 2 (block JIT, with exceptions viaJavaScriptJitAllowedForSites); in Edge, setEnhanceSecurityModeto "Strict". This shrinks the V8 attack surface but does not replace the patch. - Network/web proxy: block the "Newly Registered Domains", "Uncategorized" and "Malvertising" categories at the secure web gateway. Where available, route traffic in these categories through remote browser isolation.
- Endpoint hardening: enable ASR rules or EDR prevention policies that block child processes of browser processes. This matters because attackers typically chain this bug with a sandbox escape. Verify that site isolation and the renderer sandbox are not disabled by policy or by command-line flags (
--no-sandbox). - IAM/least privilege: prohibit web browsing from admin accounts (tiering model, PAWs). Remove local admin rights so that a successful escape does not immediately become a full host compromise.
- Segmentation: servers, OT systems and management networks should have no direct internet browsing. Allow egress HTTP(S) from those VLANs only through an allowlisted proxy.
- Embedded Chromium runtimes: Electron apps and CEF-based clients ship their own V8 builds. Inventory them and ask each vendor for their patch status.
- Configuration/browser hardening: until restarts complete, restrict V8 JIT through policy. In Chrome, set
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 / EDR process ancestry: a browser process spawns a shell or LOLBin. Sigma shape:
ParentImage|endswith: ['\chrome.exe','\msedge.exe','\opera.exe'] AND Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\wscript.exe','\mshta.exe','\rundll32.exe','\regsvr32.exe']. Treat it as high-fidelity when the parent command line contains--type=renderer. - Version compliance (Defender TVM, KQL):
DeviceTvmSoftwareInventory | where SoftwareName has "chrome" and parse_version(SoftwareVersion) < parse_version("146.0.7680.75") | summarize by DeviceName, SoftwareVersion - Sysmon EID 11 / EID 7: a browser process writes executables (
.exe,.dll,.ps1) outside the Downloads folder, or loads unsigned DLLs from%TEMP%. Either points to second-stage delivery after successful code execution. - Crash telemetry: clusters of renderer crashes (Crashpad dumps under
...\User Data\Crashpad\reports, Windows Event ID 1000 forchrome.exe/msedge.exe) shortly after visits to the same domain. Failed exploit attempts often leave exactly this trace. - Network (Zeek/proxy logs): first-seen visits to young or uncategorised domains, followed closely by anomalous egress from the same host (new TLS JA3/JA4 fingerprints, beaconing intervals). Pivot on domains visited by several users who also show renderer crashes.
- Sysmon EID 1 / EDR process ancestry: a browser process spawns a shell or LOLBin. Sigma shape:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.75 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, Debian Security Advisories, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrome |
|
| |
| chrome |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | chromium | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | chromium | trixie |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-119Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Class
The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
Entry at MITRE CWE-119
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- chromereleases.googleblog.com2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_12.htmlRelease notes, Vendor advisory
- issues.chromium.orgissues/491410818Permissions required
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-3910government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Chrome zero-days CVE-2026-3909 (Skia) and CVE-2026-3910 (V8)pwn-watch
- bleepingcomputer.comBleepingComputer Chrome zero-day rounduppwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-3910"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-3910.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-3910 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>