CriticalCVE-2025-21333

    Windows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2025-21333)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide

    What is affected, what to do

    Windows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 to version 10.0.19044.5371, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 to version 10.0.19045.5371, Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 to version 10.0.22621.4751. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 lt 10.0.19044.0..10.0.19044.5371
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.5371
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 lt 10.0.22621.0..10.0.22621.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3 lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2 lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2 lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.2894
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.25398.0..10.0.25398.1369
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2025 lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.2894
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.2894
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.5371
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.5371
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 10.0.22621.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3 10.0.22631.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.4751
    • Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.2894
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) 10.0.25398.1369
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.2894
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.2894

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide

    10.1 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 95.6

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    219.64 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    10.1 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    95.6
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 23 January 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-122

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    CISA added this flaw to KEV on patch day as an exploited zero-day; attackers use it as a second-stage tool after initial access (phishing, stolen credentials, malware loaders) to go from standard user to SYSTEM, then tamper with EDR, dump credentials and move laterally. The vector is local-only with low privileges required and no user interaction, but full impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability, and its exploitation likelihood sits well above the bulk of published CVEs — public proof-of-concept code is available. CISA does not currently flag ransomware use, yet the typical targets — Windows clients, VDI farms and developer workstations with virtualisation enabled — are exactly what ransomware operators favour. For NIS2/KRITIS organisations, handle it in an accelerated patch cycle (target: within days), with top priority for multi-user systems and privileged admin workstations.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Deploy the January 2025 security update (Patch Tuesday, 14 Jan 2025) to all affected builds. Minimum patched builds: Windows 10 21H2 10.0.19044.5371, Windows 10 22H2 10.0.19045.5371, Windows 11 22H2 10.0.22621.4751, Windows 11 22H3/23H2 10.0.22631.4751, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.2894, Windows Server 2022 23H2 (Server Core) 10.0.25398.1369. Look up the per-build KB numbers in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2025-21333.
      • Verify patch level from the endpoint, not just WSUS/Intune reporting: query OsBuildNumber plus the UBR value (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\UBR) fleet-wide and compare against the builds above.
      • Prioritise hosts with Hyper-V components enabled: clients running Windows Sandbox, WSL2, Docker Desktop, the Hyper-V role, and multi-user systems (RDS/VDI, jump hosts, developer workstations). On these, any compromised user account becomes SYSTEM.
      • Where patching must wait, disable unneeded Hyper-V-based features — especially Windows Sandbox (Disable-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName Containers-DisposableClientVM) if operationally acceptable. Check impact on VBS/Credential Guard first.
      • Re-scope open incidents involving local foothold: on unpatched hosts with recent malware or unauthorised user access, assume possible SYSTEM escalation and rotate host-resident credentials (local admin, cached domain accounts, service accounts).
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration/attack surface: Allow Hyper-V, Windows Sandbox and container features via GPO/Intune only where there is a business need; flag drift through compliance policies. The vulnerable component is the NT Kernel Integration VSP (vkrnlintvsp.sys) in the host kernel.
      • Endpoint hardening: Enforce application control (WDAC/AppLocker) to block unknown exploit binaries from user-writable paths (%TEMP%, %APPDATA%, Downloads). Local privilege escalation requires prior code execution as a user — cutting that step is the strongest lever.
      • IAM/least privilege: Restrict interactive and RDP logon rights on servers and VDI hosts to required groups. Deploy LAPS so a SYSTEM-level compromise does not translate into lateral movement via shared local admin passwords.
      • Credential protection: Enable LSA protection (RunAsPPL) and Credential Guard to make post-escalation credential theft harder; keep privileged domain accounts off standard clients (tiering model).
      • Network segmentation: No direct network signature is possible for a local exploit — instead restrict client/VDI egress to management segments (SMB 445, WinRM 5985/5986, RDP 3389) to contain follow-on activity.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 — integrity jump: a process running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM whose parent runs as a standard user at medium integrity and is not a known service/installer. KQL idea: DeviceProcessEvents | where AccountSid == "S-1-5-18" and InitiatingProcessAccountSid != "S-1-5-18" and InitiatingProcessFileName !in~ ("services.exe","msiexec.exe","svchost.exe").
      • Unexpected Windows Sandbox / Hyper-V container activity: WindowsSandbox.exe, WindowsSandboxClient.exe or vmcompute.exe on hosts where Sandbox is not normally used, especially when followed shortly by a new SYSTEM cmd.exe/powershell.exe in the same user session.
      • Kernel crashes as failed-attempt signal: System log Event ID 41 (Kernel-Power) and Event ID 1001 (BugCheck) or minidumps referencing vkrnlintvsp.sys — failed heap-overflow attempts often bluescreen the host. Treat repeated crashes on one machine as possible exploit testing.
      • EDR process ancestry: unsigned or freshly written binary in a user path → child with SYSTEM token → follow-on actions such as reg save HKLM\SAM, LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10, GrantedAccess 0x1010/0x1410), new service creation (Event 7045) or local admin group additions (Event 4732).
      • Sigma shape: logsource: windows/process_creation; selection: IntegrityLevel: System; filter_parent_system: ParentUser|contains: 'SYSTEM'; filter_installers: ParentImage|endswith: known_installers; condition: selection and not 1 of filter_* — baseline against legitimate UAC and software-deployment flows.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Windows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H2
    • 10.0.19044.0 – < 10.0.19044.5371
    • 10.0.19044.5371
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H2
    • 10.0.19045.0 – < 10.0.19045.5371
    • 10.0.19045.5371
    MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H2
    • 10.0.22621.0 – < 10.0.22621.4751
    • 10.0.22621.4751
    MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H3
    • 10.0.22631.0 – < 10.0.22631.4751
    • 10.0.22631.4751
    MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H2
    • 10.0.22631.0 – < 10.0.22631.4751
    • 10.0.22631.4751
    MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H2
    • 10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.2894
    • 10.0.26100.2894
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
    • 10.0.25398.0 – < 10.0.25398.1369
    • 10.0.25398.1369
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2025
    • 10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.2894
    • 10.0.26100.2894
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)
    • 10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.2894
    • 10.0.26100.2894

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_21h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_22h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_22h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_23h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_24h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2022_23h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2025—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow

      Variant

      A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

      Entry at MITRE CWE-122

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 52436 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • Microsoft Security Update GuideWindows Hyper-V NT Kernel Integration VSP Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Patch, Vendor advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-21333government-resource, US government resource
    • vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-21333-elevated-privilege-exposure-in-wi…Mitigation, Third-party advisory
    • vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-21333-elevated-privilege-exposure-in-wi…Mitigation, Third-party advisory
    • exploit-db.comexploits/52436Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Windows: 3 exploited vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-21333, CVE-2025-21334, CVE-2025-21335)pwn-watch
    • Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
    • Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
    • Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-21333pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-21334pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-21335pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-21333
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-21333"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-21333.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-21333 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>