CriticalCVE-2023-23376

    Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2023-23376)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 to version 10.0.10240.19747, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 to version 10.0.14393.5717, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 to version 10.0.17763.4010. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 lt 10.0.10240.0..10.0.10240.19747
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 20H2 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19042.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 lt 10.0.19043.0..10.0.19044.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2 lt 10.0.0..10.0.22621.1574
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 lt 10.0.22621.0..10.0.22621.1265
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.21915
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.26366
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.26366
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.21915
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.24116
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.24116
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.20821
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.20821
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2016 lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2019 lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022 lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.1547
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 10.0.10240.19747
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 20H2 10.0.19042.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.2604
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2 10.0.22621.1574
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2 10.0.22621.1265
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 6.0.6003.21915
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 6.1.7601.26366
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) 6.1.7601.26366
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) 6.0.6003.21915
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.24116
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.24116
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.20821
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.20821
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.5717
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.4010
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.1547

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    10.9 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 95.9

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    239.68 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    10.9 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    95.9
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 9 February 2023
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-122

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    CVE-2023-23376 was exploited as a zero-day around its patch release and has been on KEV since February 2023, with CISA flagging known ransomware use. It is not network-reachable, but requires only low local privileges, no user interaction and low attack complexity — making it a dependable second-stage step for turning a phishing foothold or compromised user account into SYSTEM, then disabling security tooling and harvesting credentials. Exploitation likelihood is high, well above most published CVEs. For organisations with large Windows client estates, RDS farms or VDI, treat it as high priority and close it within your emergency patch window; given the fix has been available for a long time, any remaining unpatched host is first and foremost a patch-management finding.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Deploy the February 2023 cumulative security update (Patch Tuesday, 14 Feb 2023) or any later cumulative update. Per the context, the following builds are the boundary versions; anything below is affected: Windows 10 1507 → 10.0.10240.19747, 1607 → 10.0.14393.5717, 1809 → 10.0.17763.4010, 20H2 → 10.0.19042.2604, 21H2 → 10.0.19044.2604, 22H2 → 10.0.19045.2604; Windows 11 21H2 → 10.0.22000.1574, 22H2 → 10.0.22621.1265. Look up the exact KB per edition in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2023-23376, and check Server editions there as well.
      • Measure patch compliance: pull CurrentBuild + UBR from HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion via Intune/SCCM/WSUS reporting and compare against the boundary builds above. Raise high-priority tickets for anything below.
      • Patch multi-user and high-exposure hosts first: RDS/terminal servers, VDI pools, jump hosts, admin workstations and general user clients with mail/browser access — where low-privilege local footholds are most likely.
      • Rule out active compromise: if you see ransomware precursors (unexpected SYSTEM processes spawned from user context, new services, LSASS access), isolate the host via EDR and rotate local admin and cached domain credentials.
      • Document exceptions: move hosts that cannot be patched quickly (OT-adjacent clients, legacy kit) into a time-boxed risk acceptance and enforce the compensating controls below.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Restrict initial access (network/perimeter): the bug needs local code execution, so harden the routes in — block internet-sourced macros, filter ISO/IMG/LNK attachments at the mail gateway, expose RDP only via VPN/jump host with MFA.
      • Application control (endpoint hardening): WDAC or AppLocker policies that deny unsigned binaries from user-writable paths (%TEMP%, %APPDATA%, C:\Users\Public, Downloads) — public CLFS exploits are typically dropped there as standalone EXE/DLL.
      • Defender ASR rules: enable "Block executable files from running unless they meet a prevalence, age, or trusted list criterion", "Block credential stealing from the Windows local security authority subsystem" and "Block process creations originating from PSExec and WMI commands" to cut post-escalation activity.
      • Least privilege / IAM: remove local admin rights, deploy Windows LAPS, enable Credential Guard and LSA protection (RunAsPPL) so SYSTEM on a workstation does not translate directly into domain compromise.
      • Tiering: prevent privileged domain accounts from logging on to unpatched workstations (Tier 0/1 separation, "Deny log on locally" via GPO).
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Sysmon EID 11 / EDR file events: creation of .blf files or CLFS containers outside normal paths (C:\Windows\System32\config\, C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles\) by non-system processes. KQL sketch: DeviceFileEvents | where FileName endswith ".blf" and not(FolderPath has_any ("\\System32\\config\\","\\System32\\LogFiles\\")) and InitiatingProcessAccountName !~ "system"
      • Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688): a process running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM / IntegrityLevel=System whose parent runs as a standard user at Medium integrity (e.g. cmd.exe/powershell.exe as SYSTEM under an EXE in %TEMP%). Sigma shape: ParentUser != SYSTEM AND User == SYSTEM AND ParentImage NOT IN (services.exe, svchost.exe, wininit.exe).
      • clfs.sys crashes: failed exploit attempts often bugcheck — System log Event ID 1001 (BugCheck) or 41 (Kernel-Power) with CLFS.SYS in the minidump; repeated occurrences on one host warrant investigation.
      • Post-escalation behaviour: Sysmon EID 10 with TargetImage=lsass.exe from unusual processes, Security 7045/4697 (new service install), vssadmin delete shadows / wbadmin delete catalog as classic ransomware staging.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Source: CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), pwn.watch, cvelistv5

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1507
    • 10.0.10240.0 – < 10.0.10240.19747
    • 10.0.10240.19747
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1607
    • 10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.5717
    • 10.0.14393.5717
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 1809
    • 10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.4010
    • 10.0.17763.4010
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 20H2
    • 10.0.0 – < 10.0.19042.2604
    • 10.0.19042.2604
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H2
    • 10.0.19043.0 – < 10.0.19044.2604
    • 10.0.19044.2604
    MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H2
    • 10.0.19045.0 – < 10.0.19045.2604
    • 10.0.19045.2604
    MicrosoftWindows 11 version 21H2
    • 10.0.0 – < 10.0.22621.1574
    • 10.0.22621.1574
    MicrosoftWindows 11 version 22H2
    • 10.0.22621.0 – < 10.0.22621.1265
    • 10.0.22621.1265
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
    • 6.1.7601.0 – < 6.1.7601.26366
    • 6.1.7601.26366
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
    • 6.1.7601.0 – < 6.1.7601.26366
    • 6.1.7601.26366
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
    • 6.0.6003.0 – < 6.0.6003.21915
    • 6.0.6003.21915
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
    • 6.0.6003.0 – < 6.0.6003.21915
    • 6.0.6003.21915
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2012
    • 6.2.9200.0 – < 6.2.9200.24116
    • 6.2.9200.24116
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
    • 6.2.9200.0 – < 6.2.9200.24116
    • 6.2.9200.24116
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2
    • 6.3.9600.0 – < 6.3.9600.20821
    • 6.3.9600.20821
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
    • 6.3.9600.0 – < 6.3.9600.20821
    • 6.3.9600.20821
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2016
    • 10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.5717
    • 10.0.14393.5717
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
    • 10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.5717
    • 10.0.14393.5717
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2019
    • 10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.4010
    • 10.0.17763.4010
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
    • 10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.4010
    • 10.0.17763.4010
    MicrosoftWindows Server 2022
    • 10.0.20348.0 – < 10.0.20348.1547
    • 10.0.20348.1547

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_1507—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_1607—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_1809—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_20h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_21h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_22h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_21h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_22h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2008r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2008—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2016—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2019—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2022—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow

      Variant

      A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

      Entry at MITRE CWE-122

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedMicrosoft

      1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)changed
      Windows 10 Version 1809, Windows 10 Version 1809, Windows Server 2019 (+20)
      Windows 10 Version 1507, Windows 10 Version 1607, Windows 10 Version 1809 (+20)

      Source identifier: secure@microsoft.com

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2023-23376
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2023-23376"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2023-23376.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2023-23376 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>