Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities (CVE-2022-20699)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Cisco Rv340 Firmware
lte *..1.0.03.24 - Cisco Rv340w Firmware
lte *..1.0.03.24 - Cisco Rv345 Firmware
lte *..1.0.03.24 - Cisco Rv345p Firmware
lte *..1.0.03.24
- Cisco Rv340 Firmware
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
10.0
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
10.0
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
72.5 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.44
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 229.50 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 10.0 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 10.0
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 72.5 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.44
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 29 October 2024
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-121
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and gives root-level code execution on a perimeter device, which puts it in the top severity tier. Public exploit code has been available since disclosure, and its exploitation likelihood ranks among the highest of all CVEs. Attackers mainly use compromised SOHO/SMB routers for botnets, as proxy and relay infrastructure, and as a foothold into internal networks; CISA does not flag ransomware use. Treat any device with internet-facing SSL VPN as critical and patch or disable it within 24 hours. Internal-only units can follow the normal patch cycle.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory: Find every Cisco Small Business RV340, RV340W, RV345 and RV345P, including branch offices, remote sites and home offices. Firmware is shown under Status and Statistics → System Summary. Firmware 1.0.03.24 is confirmed affected. The same advisory also covers RV160/RV260, so check those too.
- Upgrade firmware: A patch is available from Cisco — look up the fixed release in the vendor advisory. Download only from software.cisco.com and verify the hash, since the advisory also covers loading unsigned software.
- Disable SSL VPN until patched: The flaw sits in the SSL VPN (AnyConnect-compatible) gateway and is reachable from the internet without authentication. Turn it off under VPN → SSL VPN, or temporarily move remote access to IPsec or a different concentrator.
- Kill WAN-side remote management: Disable Firewall → Basic Settings → Remote Web Management. Block the configured SSL VPN port and the HTTPS management ports (typically TCP 443/8443) on the WAN interface.
- Assume compromise where exposed: Treat any unpatched device that had SSL VPN reachable from the internet as potentially compromised. Back up the config and diff it against a known-good baseline (users, port forwards, DNS servers, static routes). Rotate local admin and VPN credentials and PSKs. Factory-reset and reflash if anything looks off.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation / perimeter: If an upstream firewall exists, restrict the RV's SSL VPN port to known source ranges (geo- or allowlisting). Expose management interfaces only to a dedicated management VLAN.
- IPS/WAF: Enable CVE-2022-20699 signatures on upstream IPS (search Cisco Talos/Snort and Suricata ET rulesets for "Cisco RV SSL VPN"). Additionally, alert on or block oversized HTTP headers and long
Cookie/body fields sent to the SSL VPN endpoint. - Egress filtering: Limit connections initiated by the router itself to what it needs (NTP, DNS, Cisco update servers). Log and block anything else from the router's management IP to arbitrary internet destinations. This breaks second-stage payload downloads and botnet C2.
- Configuration hardening: Disable unused services (UPnP, WAN-side Telnet/SSH, Bonjour). Set strong, unique admin passwords. Configure remote syslog to a central collector so logs survive a device reset.
- Lifecycle: For KRITIS/NIS2-relevant sites, assess whether exposed SMB routers should be replaced with centrally managed firewalls that have a proper patch process. Record the decision in the risk register.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Look for HTTP/TLS sessions to the SSL VPN port with abnormally large request headers or bursts of failed handshakes. Zeek idea:
http.log | where id.resp_h in rv_wan_ips and request_body_len > 4096. Correlate Suricata alerts whosemsgcontains "CVE-2022-20699". - Router-originated outbound traffic (NetFlow/firewall logs): Flag new destinations contacted by the router's own IP, especially HTTP/TFTP downloads, IRC-style ports or hosting-provider ASNs. SPL example:
index=netflow src_ip IN (rv_*) NOT dest_port IN (53,123,443) | stats dc(dest_ip) by src_ip. - Device syslog: Watch for SSL VPN process crashes or restarts, unexpected reboots, new local users, config changes outside maintenance windows, and logins from unfamiliar IPs. Sigma shape:
logsource: syslog, product: cisco_rv/keywords: ['sslvpn', 'segfault', 'reboot', 'user added']. - Config drift: Export the running config on a schedule and diff it against the baseline automatically. Changed DNS servers, new port forwards and extra VPN users are the key signals.
- Exposure monitoring: Scan your own external IP ranges (Shodan/Censys queries or an ASM tool) for reachable RV SSL VPN login pages.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Look for HTTP/TLS sessions to the SSL VPN port with abnormally large request headers or bursts of failed handshakes. Zeek idea:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Other | cisco | rv340_firmware | — |
| Other | cisco | rv340w_firmware | — |
| Other | cisco | rv345_firmware | — |
| Other | cisco | rv345p_firmware | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-121Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Variant
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Entry at MITRE CWE-121
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Cisco RV340 SSL VPN Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- tools.cisco.com20220203 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers VulnerabilitiesVendor advisory, x_refsource_CISCO, Vendor advisory
- zerodayinitiative.comadvisories/ZDI-22-414x_refsource_MISC, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/167113/Cisco-RV340-SSL-VPN-Unauthenticated-Remote-Code-Ex…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-20699government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2022-20699"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2022-20699.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2022-20699 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>