CriticalCVE-2021-41357

    Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2021-41357)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H1 to version 10.0.19043.1288, Microsoft Windows Server 2022 to version 10.0.20348.288, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004 to version 10.0.19041.1288. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H1 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19043.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022 lt 10.0.0..10.0.20348.288
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19041.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server version 2004 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19041.1288
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 20H2 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19042.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server version 20H2 lt 10.0.0..10.0.19042.1288
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2 lt 10.0.0..10.0.22000.258
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H1 10.0.19043.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.288
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004 10.0.19041.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server version 2004 10.0.19041.1288
    • Microsoft Windows 10 Version 20H2 10.0.19042.1288
    • Microsoft Windows Server version 20H2 10.0.19042.1288
    • Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2 10.0.22000.258

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    1.6 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 75.5

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    184.58 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    1.6 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    75.5
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 4 June 2024

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This is a local kernel privilege escalation that requires low-privileged code execution beforehand. Attackers use it as a second-stage step after phishing, a malware dropper or compromised RDP access, to gain SYSTEM, disable EDR and harvest credentials. Exploitation likelihood is moderate and CISA does not flag ransomware use, but Win32k bugs are routinely chained into reliable exploit kits, which is why this one made KEV. Rank shared session hosts and out-of-support builds at the top. Fully updated endpoints on a current cumulative update only need verification, not emergency action.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory build levels: Check every Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server host against the fixed builds: 10.0.19041.1288 (Windows 10 2004 / Server 2004), 10.0.19042.1288 (Windows 10 20H2 / Server 20H2), 10.0.19043.1288 (Windows 10 21H1), 10.0.22000.258 (Windows 11 21H2) and 10.0.20348.288 (Server 2022). In MDE: DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilities | where CveId == "CVE-2021-41357". Otherwise read the build number and UBR from HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion.
      • Deploy a cumulative update: Use any cumulative security update that brings hosts to at least those builds. Patch available from the vendor — look up the KB number in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2021-41357. Any later cumulative update also contains the fix. Hosts still below these builds are missing many other security fixes too.
      • Patch shared hosts first: Prioritise RDS/Citrix session hosts, VDI pools, jump hosts and build agents. These are where many low-privileged users run code locally, and exploitation only requires a local session.
      • Flag out-of-support releases: Windows 10 2004/20H2/21H1 and Server 2004/20H2 no longer receive updates. Upgrade them to a supported release, or isolate them from production networks until you can.
      • Trigger compromise assessment: On unpatched hosts with a known initial-access event (phishing, malware detection), assume SYSTEM-level escalation may have occurred. Reset local accounts and cached credentials. If privileged domain accounts were logged on to the host, rotate those as well.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Application control (endpoint): Enforce WDAC or AppLocker for user-writable paths (%TEMP%, %APPDATA%, Downloads, C:\Users\Public). A Win32k exploit needs attacker code running on the host first, and this makes that prerequisite much harder to meet.
      • Win32k syscall filtering: Use Exploit Protection (Set-ProcessMitigation -Name <app>.exe -Enable DisableWin32kSystemCalls) to strip the Win32k attack surface from exposed non-GUI processes. Validate in audit mode first, because GUI applications break under this setting.
      • Restrict interactive logon (IAM): On servers, limit "Allow log on locally" and "Allow log on through Remote Desktop Services" to admin groups via GPO. Apply "Deny log on locally" to service accounts.
      • Contain post-escalation impact: Enable Credential Guard and LSA protection (RunAsPPL=1) so that SYSTEM access does not translate directly into stolen LSASS secrets. Deploy LAPS for unique local admin passwords and enforce admin tiering, with no Tier-0 logons on workstations.
      • Kernel hardening: Turn on HVCI / Memory Integrity and confirm EDR tamper protection is enabled. Kernel-level escalation is commonly used to blind security tooling.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Integrity-level jump (Sysmon EID 1 / MDE): Alert when a System-integrity process is spawned by a Medium/Low-integrity parent. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where ProcessIntegrityLevel == "System" and InitiatingProcessIntegrityLevel in ("Medium","Low") and InitiatingProcessAccountSid != "S-1-5-18". Allowlist legitimate brokers such as consent.exe.
      • SYSTEM shell from a user context (Security EID 4688): Look for cmd.exe, powershell.exe or whoami.exe running as S-1-5-18 where the ancestry traces back to a user session (explorer.exe → unknown binary → SYSTEM shell). Sigma shape: User|contains: 'SYSTEM' AND ParentImage|contains: '\Users\'.
      • Failed exploit attempts: Watch for BugCheck events (System EID 1001) whose dumps reference win32kfull.sys or win32kbase.sys. Repeated WER crashes (Application EID 1000) of unknown binaries in user profiles also point to unstable exploit attempts.
      • Post-exploitation chain: Correlate the integrity jump with any of the following within a 10-minute window on the same host: LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10, TargetImage ending in lsass.exe, GrantedAccess 0x1010/0x1410), new service installs (System EID 7045), or EDR services being stopped or reconfigured (EID 7036/7040).
      • Unsigned binaries dropped and executed: Alert on Sysmon EID 11/29 for unsigned EXE/DLL files in user profiles that are subsequently executed. Combined with the first rule, this is a high-confidence signal.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows 10 Version 200410.0.19041.1288
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows 10 Version 20H210.0.19042.1288
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H110.0.19043.1288
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows 11 version 21H210.0.22000.258
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.288
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows Server version 200410.0.19041.1288
    WindowsMicrosoftWindows Server version 20H210.0.19042.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_180910.0.19041.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_2004—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_20H210.0.19042.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_20h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_21H110.0.19043.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_10_21h1—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_21H210.0.22000.258
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_11_21h2—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_200410.0.19041.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2004—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_202210.0.20348.288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2022—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_20H210.0.19042.1288
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_20h2—

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-41357x_refsource_MISC, Patch, Vendor advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-41357government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2021-41357
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-41357"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-41357.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-41357 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>