CriticalCVE-2020-29574

    CyberoamOS (CROS) SQL Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2020-29574)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    What is affected, what to do

    This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL statements remotely via an SQL injection in CyberoamOS (CROS) WebAdmin. It is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since 2023. Affected versions are up to and including 2020-12-04. An immediate update to the latest version is critical to mitigate this security risk.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Sophos CyberoamOS (CROS) lte *..2020-12-04

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    4.7 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 91.8

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    241.39 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    4.7 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    91.8
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 7 February 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-89

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is reachable over the network without authentication or user interaction and sits on the perimeter firewall itself. That combines full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability with a prime initial-access position. CISA flags it as used in ransomware campaigns. Attackers typically abuse such edge devices to harvest credentials and VPN configuration before pivoting into the internal network. Exploitation likelihood is markedly higher than for most CVEs. Any Cyberoam appliance still in service with internet-facing WebAdmin warrants top priority (emergency change, P1). Internal-only management exposure remains high priority, because the legacy platform needs replacing regardless.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Identify every Cyberoam appliance running CyberoamOS (CROS), including legacy boxes at branch sites, in OT networks and those run by MSPs. All builds up to and including 2020-12-04 are affected.
      • Remove WebAdmin from the internet: Disable administrative access to WebAdmin (HTTP/HTTPS, default TCP 80/443, may be customised) on all WAN zones immediately. In "Appliance Access" or the device access matrix, allow only a dedicated management network.
      • Verify hotfix status: Sophos released a hotfix delivered through the automatic update mechanism. Confirm that "Automatic Hotfix" was enabled and the fix is applied; look up the exact version in the vendor advisory. Treat any unpatched device as compromised until proven otherwise.
      • Rotate credentials: Change all local admin and user accounts on the appliance and every secret stored on it. That includes LDAP/AD bind accounts, RADIUS shared secrets, VPN PSKs and certificates, because SQL injection can dump the full configuration database.
      • Start replacement: CyberoamOS is a legacy product with expiring vendor support. Schedule migration to a supported platform (e.g. Sophos Firewall) as an emergency change, not a routine project.
      • Compromise check: If you see signs of compromise, isolate the appliance, preserve its configuration and logs, and rebuild from a known-good source. Do not blindly restore old configs. NIS2/KRITIS entities should assess reporting obligations (24 h early warning).
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Make management interfaces reachable only from a dedicated admin VLAN or an MFA-protected jump host. Add upstream ACLs that drop inbound internet traffic to the WebAdmin ports on the appliance IP.
      • IPS/WAF in front: If external reachability cannot be avoided, put an upstream IPS or reverse proxy with SQLi signatures in front of the appliance. Start from the Suricata ET "WEB_SPECIFIC_APPS" and SQL injection categories. Add a custom rule on http.uri/http.request_body matching UNION SELECT, ' OR 1=1, pg_sleep and ;-- towards the appliance IP.
      • Egress filtering for the appliance itself: Restrict outbound connections originating from the firewall to required destinations only (update servers, NTP, DNS, SIEM). Drop and log everything else to hinder payload staging and data exfiltration.
      • IAM/least privilege: Give the appliance's AD service accounts read-only rights and keep them out of privileged tiers (never Domain Admin). Keep local admin accounts to a minimum.
      • Configuration hardening: Disable the user portal and captive portal on WAN unless they are required. Enforce remote logging to an external syslog/SIEM so logs survive on-box tampering.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Alert on HTTP(S) requests from external sources to the appliance's WebAdmin ports. Where TLS is terminated at a proxy, inspect URI and body for SQL keywords. Example SPL: index=proxy dest_ip=<cyberoam_ip> (uri="*UNION*SELECT*" OR uri="*pg_sleep*" OR uri="*%27%20OR%20*")
      • Appliance logs (syslog in SIEM): Watch for new admin accounts, changes to firewall rules, NAT or device access, and admin logins from unknown IPs or outside maintenance windows. Sigma skeleton: logsource: product: cyberoam with selection: log_component|contains: 'Admin' and message|contains: ['user added','rule modified'].
      • Anomalous firewall egress: Hunt Zeek conn.log for connections sourced from the appliance's management or interface IPs to non-allowlisted destinations, especially HTTP downloads, unusual ports and long-lived sessions.
      • Follow-on activity internally: Correlate logons by the appliance service accounts outside normal LDAP binds (Windows Event ID 4624/4625 with LogonType 3/10 from the firewall IP, 4768/4769 for the bind account). Also watch for VPN logins with harvested credentials and lateral movement from the VPN pool.
      • Timing anomalies: Spikes in WebAdmin response latency or bursts of HTTP 500 responses suggest blind, time-based SQLi probing.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    An SQL injection vulnerability in the WebAdmin of Cyberoam OS through 2020-12-04 allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL statements remotely.

    Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), pwn.watch

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Othersophoscyberoamos—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

      Base

      The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-89

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • cyberoam.comngfw.htmlx_refsource_MISC
    • bleepingcomputer.comnews/security/sophos-fixes-sql-injection-vulnerability-in-their…x_refsource_MISC
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-29574government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Sophos CyberoamOS: CyberoamOS (CROS) SQL Injection Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • support.sophos.comSophos advisory: Sophos CyberoamOSpwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2020-29574pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2020-29574","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2025-02-08T04:55:18.709307Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2020-29574","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2025-02-07T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2020-29574
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2020-29574"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2020-29574.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2020-29574 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>