Microsoft Windows: Privilege Escalation (CVE-2020-0787)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) improperly handles symbolic links, aka 'Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 for 32-bit Systems..10 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 for x64-based Systems..10 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1..7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows
eq 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1..7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows
eq 8.1 for 32-bit systems..8.1 for 32-bit systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 8.1 for x64-based systems..8.1 for x64-based systems - Microsoft Windows
eq RT 8.1..RT 8.1 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq version 1803 (Core Installation)..version 1803 (Core Installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019..2019 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019 (Core installation)..2019 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2016..2016 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2016 (Core installation)..2016 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)..2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)..2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1..2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1..2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation)..2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012..2012 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 (Core installation)..2012 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 R2..2012 R2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 R2 (Core installation)..2012 R2 (Core installation)
- Microsoft Windows
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
42.5 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 241.93 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 42.5 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 98.7
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 23 November 2021
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-59
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This CVE is on KEV because it reliably delivers SYSTEM privileges in post-exploitation chains — CISA flags active use by ransomware operators and initial-access brokers who need to consolidate after an initial user-level foothold. Exploitation likelihood is in the top percentile; public PoCs (notably in the itm4n ecosystem) have been available since 2020 and are integrated into red-team tooling. The vector is local and requires user interaction, so the real risk carriers are any Windows hosts where standard users work or where phishing payloads can land (fat clients, RDS/Citrix, VDI). Treat as HIGH priority for all Windows endpoints and session hosts missing the March 2020 rollup; pure server farms without interactive users may be handled in the regular patch cycle, provided BITS usage is documented.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the Microsoft March 2020 security rollup: KB4540673 (Win10 1909/1903), KB4538461 (1809), KB4540681 (1803), KB4540673/KB4541738 (1709), KB4538602 (1607), KB4540670 (1507), KB4540688 (Win7 ESU). Any host without the March 2020 update is vulnerable — prioritise multi-user systems (RDS, jump hosts, VDI).
- Identify end-of-life assets (Windows 7 without ESU, Win10 1507/1607/1709/1803) and migrate to a supported, patched build; no regular fix exists for Win7 outside ESU.
- Reduce local attack surface: restrict interactive logon for non-privileged users on servers via GPO (seDenyInteractiveLogonRight), especially on DCs, file servers and Tier-0 admin workstations.
- Where BITS is not operationally required (isolated OT jump hosts, servers without WSUS pull), disable the service:
Set-Service BITS -StartupType Disabled; Stop-Service BITS. - Pull patch-status reports from SCCM/Intune/WSUS, raise all unpatched hosts into a high-priority change window (24-48 h), attach evidence to the vulnerability-management ticket.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Endpoint hardening: AppLocker/WDAC policy blocking execution of unsigned binaries from
%TEMP%,%LOCALAPPDATA%andC:\Users\Public— the exploit needs a user-writable path for the symlink primitive. - Filesystem controls: grant
SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilegeto administrators only; verify viasecpol.mscand GPO "User Rights Assignment". - IAM/least privilege: manage local admin accounts via LAPS, run standard users without
AdministratorsorBackup Operatorsmembership — this does not stop the EoP but shrinks the number of accounts that can land a payload capable of chaining into it. - EDR policy set to "block" for LOLBAS use of
bitsadmin.exeandStart-BitsTransferfrom user context targeting SYSTEM paths (C:\Windows\System32). - Segmentation: separate admin workstations and servers into distinct tiers; block inbound SMB/RPC on clients at the host firewall so a successful local EoP cannot pivot laterally.
- Verify backup and rollback capability (shadow copies, offline backups) — because the KEV flag confirms ransomware use, recovery readiness is part of the mitigation story.
- Endpoint hardening: AppLocker/WDAC policy blocking execution of unsigned binaries from
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Correlate Sysmon EID 11 (FileCreate) and EID 2 (FileCreateTime) under
C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\; unexpected reparse points or symlinks there are highly suspicious. - Windows Security EID 4673/4674 "Sensitive Privilege Use" with
SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilegeby non-admin SIDs — Sigma shape:EventID: 4673 AND PrivilegeList contains 'SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege' AND SubjectUserSid not in (admin_sids). - Process ancestry via EDR or Sysmon EID 1:
svchost.exehosting BITS spawning off-baseline children (cmd.exe, powershell.exe, rundll32.exe) — KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName == "svchost.exe" and InitiatingProcessCommandLine has "BITS" and FileName in ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe"). - BITS job telemetry: event log
Microsoft-Windows-Bits-Client/OperationalEID 59/60 for jobs with localfile://destinations pointing into protected directories (C:\Windows\,C:\Program Files\). - EDR alert on
bitsadmin.exe /transferorStart-BitsTransferwith destinations in write-protected system paths; map to MITRE T1197 (BITS Jobs) and T1068 (Exploitation for Privilege Escalation).
- Correlate Sysmon EID 11 (FileCreate) and EID 2 (FileCreateTime) under
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) improperly handles symbolic links, aka 'Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'.
Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 1803
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 1903
- Microsoft Windows 10 1909
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 7
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 8.1
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows RT 8.1
- Microsoft Windows Server
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1507 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1709 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1909 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_7 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_8.1 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_rt_8.1 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1909 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-59Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
Base
The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-59
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Background Intelligent Transfer Service Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0787x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/158056/Background-Intelligent-Transfer-Service-Privilege-…x_refsource_MISC
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-0787government-resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2020-0787"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2020-0787.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2020-0787 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>