Microsoft Windows Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2019-1215)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that ws2ifsl.sys (Winsock) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1253, CVE-2019-1278, CVE-2019-1303.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows
eq 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1..7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows
eq 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1..7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows
eq 8.1 for 32-bit systems..8.1 for 32-bit systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 8.1 for x64-based systems..8.1 for x64-based systems - Microsoft Windows
eq RT 8.1..RT 8.1 - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 for 32-bit Systems..10 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 for x64-based Systems..10 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1703 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1703 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1703 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation)..2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1..2008 R2 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1..2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)..2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012..2012 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 (Core installation)..2012 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 R2..2012 R2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2012 R2 (Core installation)..2012 R2 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2016..2016 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2016 (Core installation)..2016 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq version 1803 (Core Installation)..version 1803 (Core Installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019..2019 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019 (Core installation)..2019 (Core installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for Itanium-Based Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2..2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)..2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Core installation)
- Microsoft Windows
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
19.3 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 97.3
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 239.79 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 19.3 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 97.3
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 7 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-269
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
CVE-2019-1215 is a local privilege escalation in the Winsock helper driver ws2ifsl.sys. Any low-privileged foothold becomes full SYSTEM control with no user interaction, with high impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. CISA flags it for known ransomware campaign use. Operators chain it after phishing or loader-based initial access to disable EDR, harvest credentials and stage encryption. Exploitation likelihood is very high and exploit details are public. Despite the local attack vector, treat it as high priority wherever legacy Windows 10 builds remain, especially on OT-adjacent workstations, terminal servers and kiosks. Fully patched, current builds are out of scope.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Build an inventory of every Windows 10 host on builds 1507, 1607, 1703 and 1709. Use Defender TVM (
DeviceTvmSoftwareVulnerabilities | where CveId == "CVE-2019-1215") or SCCM/Intune reporting on OS build and installed cumulative update. Treat the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2019-1215 as authoritative, because additional builds and server SKUs may be affected. - Deploy the security update. A patch is available from the vendor; look up the KB number per build in the Microsoft Security Update Guide. Any current cumulative update for a supported build contains the fixed ws2ifsl.sys.
- Escalate unsupported builds. Outside the LTSB/LTSC channels, 1507, 1607, 1703 and 1709 no longer receive updates. Upgrade these hosts to a supported build. Until then, treat them as high-risk assets and pull them out of production segments.
- Patch multi-user and pivot systems first: RDS/terminal servers, Citrix VDAs, jump hosts and kiosks. On these hosts, unprivileged users can run code that this flaw turns into SYSTEM.
- If you suspect compromise, isolate the host via EDR. Then rotate local admin passwords (LAPS) and reset every domain credential cached on that machine. With SYSTEM rights, dumping LSASS is trivial.
- Build an inventory of every Windows 10 host on builds 1507, 1607, 1703 and 1709. Use Defender TVM (
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Application control: Use WDAC or AppLocker to block unsigned binaries from user-writable paths (
%TEMP%,%APPDATA%,%USERPROFILE%\Downloads,C:\Users\Public). Local privilege escalation exploits usually land as standalone EXEs or are reflectively loaded. - Cut off initial access: The bug requires local code execution, so starve that stage. Enable these ASR rules: block Office child processes, block executable content from email/webmail, and block process creation from PSExec/WMI. Block internet-sourced macros via GPO.
- IAM / least privilege: Remove local admin rights from standard users. Enforce the admin tier model so privileged domain accounts never log on to workstations. Enable Protected Users and Credential Guard to limit the blast radius once SYSTEM is obtained.
- Network segmentation: Move unpatched or end-of-life hosts into a dedicated VLAN. Block SMB (445/tcp), RDP (3389/tcp) and WinRM (5985/5986/tcp) from that VLAN towards server and client networks to slow post-escalation lateral movement.
- Endpoint hardening: Enable EDR tamper protection and run LSASS as PPL (
RunAsPPL=1). This makes it harder for ransomware operators with SYSTEM rights to kill security tooling.
- Application control: Use WDAC or AppLocker to block unsigned binaries from user-writable paths (
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688: Look for a process with
User = NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEMorIntegrityLevel = Systemwhose parent runs as a standard user. A typical example iscmd.exe/powershell.exespawning a SYSTEM shell withoutservices.exeorsvchost.exein between. Sigma shape:selection: IntegrityLevel: System+filter: ParentUser not in (SYSTEM, LOCAL SERVICE, NETWORK SERVICE). - Bugcheck telemetry: Failed use-after-free attempts often crash the box. Correlate bursts of System Event ID 41 (Kernel-Power) and Event ID 1001 (BugCheck) whose minidumps reference
ws2ifsl.sys. KQL:Event | where EventID in (41,1001) | summarize count() by Computer | where count_ > 2. - Execution from user-writable paths: In Sysmon EID 1 or the EDR process tree, look for an unsigned EXE from
\AppData\or\Temp\followed within seconds by SYSTEM-level children (whoami,net.exe,vssadmin,wmic shadowcopy). - Post-exploitation patterns: Sysmon EID 10 (ProcessAccess) against
lsass.exewithGrantedAccess0x1010 or 0x1410 from non-allowlisted processes. Security 7045/4697 (new service) shortly after a suspicious user logon. Event 1102 (security log cleared). - Ransomware staging: Watch for
vssadmin delete shadows,bcdedit /set recoveryenabled noorwbadmin delete catalogexecuted by SYSTEM without a change ticket. Alert as critical and trigger automatic host isolation.
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688: Look for a process with
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that ws2ifsl.sys (Winsock) handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1253, CVE-2019-1278, CVE-2019-1303.
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 1703
- Microsoft Windows 10 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 1803
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 1903
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 7
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 8.1
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows RT 8.1
- Microsoft Windows Server
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1507 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1703 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1709 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_7 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_8.1 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_rt_8.1 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-269Improper Privilege Management
Class
The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.
Entry at MITRE CWE-269
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-1215x_refsource_MISC, Patch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-1215government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2019-1215"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2019-1215.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2019-1215 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>