Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2019-1064)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) improperly handles hard links. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1703
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1803
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
gte 10.0.17763.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
gte 10.0.17763.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.17763.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
gte 10.0.14393.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
gte 10.0.14393.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.14393.0..*
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1703
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
6.9 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 94.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 234.79 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 6.9 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 94.1
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 7 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-59
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
CVE-2019-1064 is a low-complexity local privilege escalation: any logged-on standard user can gain full SYSTEM control without user interaction, with complete impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability. A public proof-of-concept has been available for years. It is on KEV because of confirmed use in ransomware campaigns, where operators chain it after phishing or loader access to disable EDR, harvest credentials and stage encryption. Exploitation likelihood is high for a local-only flaw. Because the affected builds are largely out of support, the real exposure sits in forgotten legacy machines, OT-adjacent operator PCs and shared multi-user hosts — rate those "high" in a NIS2/KRITIS context, and a fully patched fleet "low".
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the security update: Roll out Microsoft's fix for CVE-2019-1064 (Windows cumulative update) to every affected Windows 10 system. The patch is available from the vendor — look up the KB number per build in the Microsoft Security Update Guide. Confirm coverage by build number via Intune, SCCM/MECM or WSUS reporting.
- Hunt down unsupported builds: Windows 10 1607, 1703, 1709 and 1803 are out of mainstream servicing unless they are LTSB/LTSC. Pull them from CMDB or asset inventory and queue them for a feature upgrade to a supported build. Flag anything that cannot be upgraded as a high-risk asset.
- Patch multi-user and jump systems first: Exploitation requires a local logon. Terminal servers/VDI, jump hosts, kiosk and training machines, and hosts with third-party contractor access therefore come first.
- Treat suspected hosts as SYSTEM-compromised: Where exploitation is suspected, isolate the host via EDR network containment. Rotate the local admin password (LAPS) and treat any cached domain credentials on the box as exposed.
- Check the ransomware context: CISA confirms use in ransomware campaigns, so correlate the last 30 days of initial-access alerts (phishing payloads, loaders) on the same hosts. This bug is typically the second stage after an initial foothold.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Application control (endpoint hardening): Use AppLocker or WDAC to block unsigned binaries from user-writable paths (
%USERPROFILE%,%TEMP%,%LOCALAPPDATA%,Downloads). The exploit depends on the logged-on user running a crafted application. - Least privilege / IAM: Restrict "Allow log on locally" and "Allow log on through Remote Desktop Services" to the groups that need them. Deny interactive logon for service accounts. Strip standing local admin rights to slow down follow-on actions.
- EDR hardening: Run behavioural rules for hard-link abuse and privilege escalation in block mode, not audit mode. Enable tamper protection so the agent cannot be killed once SYSTEM is obtained.
- Configuration change (last resort, test first): Disable AppXSVC via
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\AppXSvcwithStart=4. This breaks Store/UWP apps and can disrupt the Start menu and the Settings app. Reserve it for kiosk or server-role systems with no AppX dependency. - Network segmentation: Move unpatched legacy systems into a dedicated VLAN without direct reach to domain controller management interfaces or file shares. This limits lateral movement after a local escalation.
- Application control (endpoint hardening): Use AppLocker or WDAC to block unsigned binaries from user-writable paths (
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Permission changes on system files (Windows Security log): Event ID 4670 ("Permissions on an object were changed") with
ObjectNameunderC:\Windows\orC:\Program Files\, triggered bysvchost.exein the AppXSVC context. This requires SACL auditing on critical directories. Sigma shape:EventID=4670 AND ObjectName|startswith 'C:\Windows\System32\' AND ProcessName|endswith '\svchost.exe'. - Hard-link creation by standard users (EDR telemetry): Hard links from
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\pointing at files inC:\Windows\orC:\Program Files\, for example viaCreateHardLinkorNtSetInformationFilewith FileLinkInformation. Weight unsigned creating processes running from user paths more heavily. - Writes to system binaries (Sysmon EID 11 / Defender
DeviceFileEvents): Processes other than TrustedInstaller, msiexec or Windows Update modifying files inSystem32. KQL:DeviceFileEvents | where FolderPath startswith @"C:\Windows\System32\" and InitiatingProcessAccountName !in~ ("system","trustedinstaller") and ActionType in ("FileModified","FileCreated"). - Anomalous process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR):
cmd.exe,powershell.exeor unknown binaries running asNT AUTHORITY\SYSTEMunder a service parent, shortly after the same user touched files in%LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\. Correlate the user-context process and the SYSTEM shell within a window of up to 5 minutes. - Post-escalation activity: Event ID 4720/4732 (account created or added to Administrators) or Event ID 7045 (new service installed) on workstations with no matching change ticket indicate a successful escalation.
- Permission changes on system files (Windows Security log): Event ID 4670 ("Permissions on an object were changed") with
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) improperly handles hard links. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated context. An attacker could then install programs; view, change or delete data. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system. An attacker could then run a specially crafted application that could exploit the vulnerability and take control of an affected system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows AppX Deployment Service handles hard links.
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1703 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1709 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1803 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit Systems |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based Systems |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based Systems |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 1703
- Microsoft Windows 10 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 1803
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 1903
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1703
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709 For 32-bit Systems
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1803
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1703 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1709 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1709 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_1903 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-59Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
Base
The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-59
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideWindows Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-1064x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred, Patch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-1064government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2019-1064"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2019-1064.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2019-1064 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>