Microsoft Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2019-0841)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) improperly handles hard links, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0836.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1703 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1703 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1703 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1703 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems..10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows
eq 10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems..10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems - Microsoft Windows Server
eq version 1709 (Core Installation)..version 1709 (Core Installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq version 1803 (Core Installation)..version 1803 (Core Installation) - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019..2019 - Microsoft Windows Server
eq 2019 (Core installation)..2019 (Core installation)
- Microsoft Windows
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
41.4 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 241.89 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 41.4 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 98.7
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 7 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-59
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The vulnerability is on the CISA KEV list and flagged for use in ransomware campaigns — typical usage is post-exploitation after initial user access (phishing, stolen RDP credentials) to pivot from standard user to SYSTEM, enabling lateral movement, credential dumping and encryption staging. The vector is local and needs only low privileges, but a reliable public exploit primitive exists and the exploitation likelihood ranks among the highest in the Microsoft portfolio per EPSS. Rate as HIGH priority for any estate with multi-user hosts, terminal servers or legacy Windows 10 builds; MEDIUM for single-user clients with strict application allowlisting. Hosts still on EOL builds (1703/1709/1803) should be classified "not patchable — accept risk formally or replace immediately".
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the Microsoft April 2019 security updates (Patch Tuesday, 2019-04-09) across all affected builds: Windows 10 1703/1709/1803/1809 and Windows Server 2016/2019. The MSRC advisory for CVE-2019-0841 lists the per-build KB IDs — validate the exact KB in the Update Catalog before rollout.
- Identify end-of-life builds (Windows 10 1703, 1709, 1803) and either upgrade to a supported branch immediately or decommission them; those branches receive no patch and remain permanently vulnerable.
- Prioritise multi-user systems: RDS/terminal servers, VDI pools, jump hosts and developer workstations first, because the flaw requires only an interactive logon of any user and the attack surface is maximal there.
- Inventory local and service accounts with interactive logon rights; disable those without business justification, since the vulnerability escalates from standard user to SYSTEM without further prerequisites.
- Until patch deployment completes: on servers that do not use UWP/Store apps, disable the AppX Deployment Service (
sc config AppXSVC start= disabled) and roll via GPO. Validate impact on UWP apps and MDM-driven deployments first. - Keep an IR playbook ready for compromised hosts: EDR containment, credential rotation including KRBTGT where domain controllers are reachable, forensic image before reimage.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: isolate multi-user systems (RDS, Citrix, VDI) into dedicated enclaves with strict egress filtering to limit lateral movement after a successful local escalation.
- IAM/least privilege: manage local admin passwords via LAPS, enforce a Tier-0/1 logon model on servers, apply AppLocker or WDAC policies against unsigned binaries in
%LOCALAPPDATA%\Packagesand%TEMP%. - Endpoint hardening: enable Microsoft Defender ASR rules, especially "Block abuse of exploited vulnerable signed drivers" and "Block credential stealing from LSASS"; run EDR with behavioural detection for token manipulation.
- Filesystem monitoring: log hardlink creation by non-privileged users targeting sensitive paths (
C:\Windows\System32,C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\AppRepository) via Sysmon FileCreate / FileCreateStreamHash (EID 11/15). - Configuration hardening: audit NTFS ACLs on AppX staging directories, set
fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluationto the most restrictive policy (note: this covers symlinks only — hardlinks cannot be globally disabled, which is why the patch is non-negotiable). - Report patch compliance weekly via WSUS/SCCM/Intune; document exceptions (OT, medical devices) formally with compensating controls — a NIS2 Article 21 requirement.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 (Process Create):
svchost.exe -k wsappx -p -s AppXSVCas parent of unusual children (cmd.exe,powershell.exe,rundll32.exe) — Sigma shape:parent_image endswith svchost.exe AND parent_commandline contains AppXSVC AND image endswith (cmd.exe|powershell.exe). - Windows Security EID 4688 with
TokenElevationType = TokenElevationTypeFull (1)for processes launched from user-writable paths (C:\Users\*,C:\ProgramData\*\Packages\*). - Sysmon EID 11 (FileCreate) for hardlink/junction activity under
AppRepository,WindowsAppsorPackagessubfolders by non-SYSTEM accounts, correlated with a short-interval AppX install (EID 4697 Service Install). - EDR process ancestry:
AppXSVCsuddenly writing to protected system paths or modifying services — KQL shape in Defender XDR:DeviceFileEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName == "svchost.exe" and InitiatingProcessCommandLine has "AppXSVC" and FolderPath startswith "C:\\Windows\\System32". - Inspect the Microsoft-Windows-AppXDeployment-Server/Operational log for failed or abnormal deployment transactions; repeated error events shortly before privilege-escalation indicators are a strong signal.
- Sysmon EID 1 (Process Create):
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows AppX Deployment Service (AppXSVC) improperly handles hard links, aka 'Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0730, CVE-2019-0731, CVE-2019-0796, CVE-2019-0805, CVE-2019-0836.
Source: cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1703 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1709 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1803 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | 1803 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-59Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')
Base
The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-59
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Microsoft Windows AppX Deployment Service Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Internet Explorer JavaScript Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Microsoft Windows AppX Deployment Service Local Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Microsoft Windows AppX Deployment Service Local Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | AppXSvc Hard Link Privilege Escalation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Exploit-DB | EDB-ID 46683 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2019-0841x_refsource_MISC
- exploit-db.com46683Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/152463/Microsoft-Windows-AppX-Deployment-Service-Privileg…x_refsource_MISC
- zerodayinitiative.comadvisories/ZDI-19-360x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/153009/Internet-Explorer-JavaScript-Privilege-Escalation.…x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/153114/Microsoft-Windows-AppX-Deployment-Service-Local-Pr…x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/153215/Microsoft-Windows-AppX-Deployment-Service-Local-Pr…x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/153642/AppXSvc-Hard-Link-Privilege-Escalation.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-0841government-resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2019-0841"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2019-0841.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2019-0841 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>