Microsoft HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2015-1635)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
HTTP.sys in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests, aka "HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008
eq r2..r2 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
eq r2..r2
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
—
EPSS score
No value is available for this vulnerability.
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 229.00 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-94
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is reachable over the network without authentication and sits in the kernel driver beneath every HTTP.sys-based service. It is among the CVEs most likely to be exploited at all and has been baked into scanners and exploit frameworks for years. In practice, attackers mostly achieve denial of service (bluescreen) and kernel memory disclosure, although code execution remains theoretically possible. Typical targets are forgotten legacy web servers, OT-adjacent HMI/SCADA web front ends and long-lived line-of-business apps at critical-infrastructure operators. Treat any internet-facing or operationally critical unpatched host as top priority. Segmented, patched systems only need a verification sweep. The real residual risk is the end-of-life status of the affected platforms.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Apply the security update: Microsoft shipped the fix in 2015 as bulletin MS15-034 (KB3042553). Confirm the patch level against the vendor advisory. Any later cumulative or rollup update already contains the fix. Verify with
Get-HotFix -Id KB3042553or through WSUS/SCCM compliance reports. - Inventory every HTTP.sys listener, not just IIS: This covers Windows 7, 8, 8.1, Server 2008 R2 SP1, 2012 and 2012 R2. It includes WinRM (TCP 5985/5986), SSRS, WSUS, ADFS/WAP, Exchange front ends, Print over HTTP and third-party apps built on
http.sys. List active bindings withnetsh http show servicestate. - Isolate internet-facing unpatched hosts immediately, or place them behind a reverse proxy or WAF that normalises request headers. Block direct TCP 80/443 to the host.
- Interim workaround if you cannot patch: Disable the IIS kernel cache, either in IIS Manager → Output Caching → untick "Enable kernel cache" or via
appcmd set config /section:system.webServer/caching /enableKernelCache:false. This reduces exposure but may cost some performance. - Flag lifecycle risk: All affected OS versions are end-of-life. Tag hosts without ESU coverage as high-risk assets and record the migration plan in your risk treatment register (NIS2 Art. 21).
- Apply the security update: Microsoft shipped the fix in 2015 as bulletin MS15-034 (KB3042553). Confirm the patch level against the vendor advisory. Any later cumulative or rollup update already contains the fix. Verify with
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Allow WinRM (5985/5986) and admin HTTP services only from dedicated admin networks (PAW or jump-host VLAN). Permit inbound HTTP/HTTPS to legacy servers solely via a reverse proxy.
- WAF/reverse-proxy rule: Drop requests whose
Rangeheader matchesbytes=\d+-\d{11,}or contains18446744073709551615. Alternatively, stripRangeentirely for static content. - IPS signatures: Enable the public Snort/Suricata rules for MS15-034 (ET and Talos rulesets, keyword "MS15-034" or "HTTP.sys Range"). Set them to blocking mode on legacy segments.
- TLS termination upstream: Inspection only works if HTTPS is terminated before the IIS host. Otherwise the IPS never sees the Range header.
- Configuration hardening: Remove unneeded HTTP.sys URL reservations with
netsh http delete urlacl. Uninstall unused roles such as WebDAV and Print over HTTP.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Look for HTTP requests carrying
Range: bytes=with an upper bound of 2^32 or more. Suricata:content:"Range|3a| bytes="; http_header; pcre:"/bytes=\d+-\d{11,}/H";. In Zeek, enable header logging and filter for18446744073709551615. - Windows System log: Watch for unexpected crashes on IIS hosts, which are the typical symptom of exploit attempts (BSOD/DoS). Relevant events are System Event ID 1001 (BugCheck), 41 (Kernel-Power) and 6008 (unexpected shutdown). KQL:
Event | where EventLog=="System" and EventID in (41,1001,6008) | join kind=inner (IISHosts) on Computer. - HTTPERR/IIS logs: Review
%SystemRoot%\System32\LogFiles\HTTPERRfor bursts ofConnection_Dropped,Request_Cancelledor416responses, grouped by source IP. W3C logs do not record the Range header by default, so add it as a custom logging field. - Scanner patterns: Bursts of short GET/HEAD requests to
/,/iisstart.htmor/welcome.pngfrom a single source are characteristic of MS15-034 scanners. Sigma shape:logsource: webserver,cs-method in (GET, HEAD),cs-uri-stem: /welcome.png, aggregated ascount() by c-ip > 20 in 5m. - EDR: After any crash, review process activity on the host. Treat child processes of
w3wp.exesuch ascmd.exe,powershell.exeorrundll32.exeas indicators of compromise.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Look for HTTP requests carrying
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
HTTP.sys in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, and Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted HTTP requests, aka "HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_7 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_8 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_8.1 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Entry at MITRE CWE-94
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Microsoft Windows HTTP.sys Proof Of Concept (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Exploit-DB | EDB-ID 36773 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Exploit-DB | EDB-ID 36776 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- docs.microsoft.comMS15-034Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS, Patch, Vendor advisory
- exploit-db.com36773Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- osvdb.org120629Vulnerability database, x_refsource_OSVDB, Broken link
- securitytracker.com1032109Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- securityfocus.com74013Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- exploit-db.com36776Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/131463/Microsoft-Windows-HTTP.sys-Proof-Of-Concept.htmlx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2015-1635government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2015-1635"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2015-1635.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2015-1635 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>