CriticalCVE-2014-6332

    Microsoft Windows: Remote Code Execution (CVE-2014-6332)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    OleAut32.dll in OLE in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, as demonstrated by an array-redimensioning attempt that triggers improper handling of a size value in the SafeArrayDimen function, aka "Windows OLE Automation Array Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 eq r2..r2
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 eq r2..r2

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    8.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    94.9 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.86

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    223.78 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    94.9 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.86
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 February 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-119

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This CVE sits on KEV because since 2014 it has been one of the most reliable weaponised drive-by exploits, built into virtually every major exploit kit and still used for initial access against unpatched legacy estates — commodity malware, banking trojans and as a stepping stone into later ransomware stages. The attack is network-reachable, needs only a browser visit to a crafted page and yields high-privilege code execution; exploitation likelihood is among the highest tracked. Priority is high wherever the asset inventory still shows Windows 7/8/8.1 or Server 2003/2008/2012 with Internet Explorer or Office clients using OLE; in pure Windows 10/11 estates with IE removed, urgency drops but the patch still belongs in the regular rollout. For NIS2 and KRITIS scope this CVE is a classic audit finding on OT jump hosts and HMI workstations.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Deploy Microsoft bulletin MS14-064 (KB3011443) across every affected Windows build — in particular workstations still running Internet Explorer and legacy hosts (Windows 7/8/8.1, Server 2003/2008/2008 R2/2012). Windows Server 2003 and Vista no longer receive updates outside Extended Security Updates; treat them as unpatchable.
      • Isolate any legacy host that cannot be patched into a dedicated VLAN without internet egress and without access to mail gateways or user browsing paths.
      • Disable Internet Explorer organisation-wide via GPO or restrict it to defined intranet zones; move the default browser to a current Chromium/Firefox build.
      • Enable EMET or Exploit Guard (ASR) on remaining legacy clients and disable VBScript in the IE Internet Zone (URLAction 1400 set to "Disable" in Zone 3; restrict ActiveX install via FEATURE_RESTRICT_ACTIVEXINSTALL).
      • Block Office macros and OLE object embedding in Office documents via GPO — the exploit also fires from embedded HTML/VBScript payloads carried inside Office files.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network: force all legacy clients through a TLS-inspecting web proxy; block known exploit-kit signatures historically weaponising CVE-2014-6332 (Angler, RIG, Neutrino) and obfuscated VBScript payloads in HTTP response bodies.
      • Perimeter/IPS: enable Suricata/Snort coverage for the SafeArrayDimen payload shape (pattern match on redim preserve, runmumaa, CollectGarbage() sequences in HTML responses); ET signatures 2019714 and successors.
      • Endpoint: AppLocker/WDAC rule blocking wscript.exe, cscript.exe and mshta.exe as children of iexplore.exe, winword.exe, excel.exe, powerpnt.exe. EDR rule: block when iexplore.exe drops and executes a PE from %TEMP%.
      • IAM: no local admin on workstations; browser sessions under dedicated low-integrity accounts; restrict Kerberos delegation on file servers to slow post-RCE lateral movement.
      • Configuration: set the ActiveX kill-bit for the affected OleAut32 automation class via registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\ActiveX Compatibility) if the patch has to be rolled back. Disable SMBv1 and other legacy protocols on the same hosts — follow-on stages typically depend on them.
      • Deploy Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) or terminal-server-based browsing for users who must keep legacy software for operational reasons.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Sysmon EID 1 (Process Create): iexplore.exe spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe, wscript.exe, cscript.exe, mshta.exe or rundll32.exe — classic post-exploitation chain after OLE RCE.
      • Sysmon EID 11 (File Create) plus EID 7 (Image Load): new PE files written to %LOCALAPPDATA%\Temp or %APPDATA% by iexplore.exe or Office processes, followed by load of unusual DLLs.
      • Web proxy / Zeek HTTP log: text/html responses that simultaneously contain VBScript, redim preserve, CreateObject("Wscript.Shell") and obfuscated hex blobs — Sigma shape: selection: c-mime contains "text/html" and c-body contains all ("redim preserve","CreateObject").
      • Windows Security EID 4688 / EDR telemetry: unexpected child processes of Office applications correlated with OLE object activation (packager.dll, ole32.dll image loads).
      • KQL example (Defender/Sentinel): DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("iexplore.exe","winword.exe","excel.exe") | where FileName in~ ("powershell.exe","wscript.exe","cscript.exe","mshta.exe","cmd.exe") | project Timestamp, DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName, FileName, ProcessCommandLine.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    OleAut32.dll in OLE in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, as demonstrated by an array-redimensioning attempt that triggers improper handling of a size value in the SafeArrayDimen function, aka "Windows OLE Automation Array Remote Code Execution Vulnerability."

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_7—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_8—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_8.1—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_rt—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_rt_8.1—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2003—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2008r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2008—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_vista—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-119Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

      Class

      The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-119

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    Packet StormAvant Browser Lite Ultimate Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Packet StormThe World Browser 3.0 Final Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Packet StormHTML Compiler Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Packet StormMicrosoft Compiled HTML Help Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Packet StormWinamp Bento Browser Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 37668 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 37800 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 38500 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 38512 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • exploit-db.com37668Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • exploit-db.com37800Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • kb.cert.orgVU#158647Third-party advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN, Third-party advisory, US government resource
    • exploit-db.com38512Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • us-cert.govTA14-318BThird-party advisory, x_refsource_CERT, Third-party advisory, US government resource
    • docs.microsoft.comMS14-064Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS, Patch, Vendor advisory
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/134062/HTML-Compiler-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • securityfocus.com70952Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/134064/Microsoft-Compiled-HTML-Help-Remote-Code-Execution…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/134053/Avant-Browser-Lite-Ultimate-Remote-Code-Execution.…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • securitytracker.com1031184Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/134061/The-World-Browser-3.0-Final-Remote-Code-Execution.…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • forsec.nlwp-content/uploads/2014/11/ms14_064_ie_olerce.rb_.txtx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/134079/Winamp-Bento-Browser-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • securityintelligence.comibm-x-force-researcher-finds-significant-vulnerability-in-micro…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory
    • exploit-db.com38500Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2014-6332government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2014-6332
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2014-6332"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2014-6332.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2014-6332 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>