Not ratedosv:RUSTSEC-2026-0236

    A `BigInt` division panics, and two neighbouring operations answer wrongly in silence

    Published Sources: OSV

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance and the linked original advisory.

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    —

    XIEM Effective CVSS

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    CVSS v3

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    EPSS score

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Not rated
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    21.30 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    viperjs is a JavaScript engine intended to run untrusted script inside a host application, so script text is data rather than a trusted caller and a panic reachable from script is a denial of service in the embedder's process.

    A divisor whose magnitude lands exactly on the engine's internal limb ceiling reaches an out-of-bounds index. On every released version up to and including 0.2.1:

    const d = (1n << 33554399n) * 2n;
    1n / d;   // panic: index out of bounds
    

    Two further operations on the same value returned wrong results without raising anything, which is the more dangerous half for an embedder that acts on the answer:

    d % 7n;      // 0n  — the true remainder is 1n
    String(d);   // "0"
    

    Cause

    The left-shift helper reserved one limb for the bits a shift may push past the top of the magnitude, measured that width against the size ceiling, and then trimmed the reserved limb away again — so a magnitude landing exactly on the ceiling was refused on account of room it does not keep. The division treated that refusal as unreachable and discarded it with unwrap_or_default, leaving an empty divisor magnitude; the subsequent divisor[n - 1] is then an index of usize::MAX.

    The crate is #![forbid(unsafe_code)], so this is a panic and not memory unsafety.

    Remediation

    Upgrade to 0.2.2, in which all three behaviours are fixed: both divisions now produce correct results, and String() of a magnitude beyond what the engine can divide raises a RangeError rather than producing "0" — ECMA-262 §6.1.4 requires an implementation that imposes a limit to throw rather than answer something else.

    There is no workaround short of upgrading; the values are reachable from any script the embedder evaluates.

    Reported by @Zniece.

    Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)