Linux Kernel: security vulnerability (CVE-2026-89774)
Published Last modified Sources: HKCERT, Ubuntu, SUSE, CVE.org, OSV, BSI
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: SCO: hold sk properly in sco_conn_ready sk deref in sco_conn_ready must be done either under conn->lock, or holding a refcount, to avoid concurrent close. conn->sk and parent sk is currently accessed without either, and without checking parent->sk_state: [Task 1] [Task 2] sco_sock_release sco_conn_ready sk = conn->sk lock_sock(sk) conn->sk = NULL lock_sock(sk) release_sock(sk) sco_sock_kill(sk) UAF on sk deref and similarly for access to sco_get_sock_listen() return value. Fix possible UAF by holding sk refcount in sco_conn_ready() and making sco_get_sock_listen() increase refcount.
Update Linux Kernel to version 5.15.212, Linux Kernel to version 6.1.178, Linux Kernel to version 6.6.145.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 5.15..5.15.212 - Linux Kernel
lt 5.16..6.1.178 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.2..6.6.145 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.7..6.12.97 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.18.40 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.19..7.1
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
5.15.212 - Linux Kernel
6.1.178 - Linux Kernel
6.6.145 - Linux Kernel
6.12.97 - Linux Kernel
6.18.40 - Linux Kernel
7.1
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: HKCERT, Ubuntu, SUSE, CVE.org, OSV, BSI
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 34.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 79.71 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 34.7
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: SCO: hold sk properly in sco_conn_ready sk deref in sco_conn_ready must be done either under conn->lock, or holding a refcount, to avoid concurrent close. conn->sk and parent sk is currently accessed without either, and without checking parent->sk_state: [Task 1] [Task 2] sco_sock_release sco_conn_ready sk = conn->sk lock_sock(sk) conn->sk = NULL lock_sock(sk) release_sock(sk) sco_sock_kill(sk) UAF on sk deref and similarly for access to sco_get_sock_listen() return value. Fix possible UAF by holding sk refcount in sco_conn_ready() and making sco_get_sock_listen() increase refcount. Also recheck after lock_sock that the socket is still valid. Adjust conn->sk locking so it's protected also by lock_sock() of the associated socket if any.
Source: HKCERT (CC BY 3.0 HK) · HKCERT rating: medium, Ubuntu Security Notices, suse_csaf, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
| Android |
|
| |
| Android 14 |
|
| |
| Android 15 |
|
| |
| Android 16 |
|
| |
| Android 17 |
|
| |
| Android Automotive OS |
|
| |
| Android XR |
|
| |
| android | :linux_kernel: |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gkeop | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-hwe-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-ibm | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-ibm | resolute |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/50aae396dc30377bec8e3b181b8346f8fd38f7d8
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/6e3840578aaad1a296aab1eaaa89ea3b7d5cbae1
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/d141d9b769bcd1b747898528c5023270cda040f2
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/73cb063f5ec6ca51eb1e246c6d332563002ac277
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/7199c78c3a3e399a4dc439d845826793880ccedc
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/4e37f6452d586b95c346a9abdd2fb80b67794f39
- source.android.comsecurity/bulletin/2026-11-01advisory
- android.googlesource.comkernel/common/+/315636ba7cbf03382cfa7bd8887118f59fe96c5ffix
- android.googlesource.comkernel/common/+/598dbca6a3f78f038650c434935c86d8c3a6edfbfix
- android.googlesource.comkernel/common/+/84728e305ff666fc2bf2be382b422b51912d7b1cfix
- android.googlesource.comkernel/common/+/a377ba61de42bb336732bd273330fcbfd3d51f3afix
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
CVSS V3.1: AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
ReceivedLinux
Description added or changed
New references:- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e37f6452d586b95c346a9abdd2fb80b67794f39
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50aae396dc30377bec8e3b181b8346f8fd38f7d8
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e3840578aaad1a296aab1eaaa89ea3b7d5cbae1
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7199c78c3a3e399a4dc439d845826793880ccedc
and 2 more references
Show 8 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: SCO: hold sk properly in sco_conn_ready sk deref in sco_conn_ready must be done either under conn->lock, or holding a refcount, to avoid concurrent close. conn->sk and parent sk is currently accessed without either, and without checking parent->sk_state: [Task 1] [Task 2] sco_sock_release sco_conn_ready sk = conn->sk lock_sock(sk) conn->sk = NULL lock_sock(sk) release_sock(sk) sco_sock_kill(sk) UAF on sk deref and similarly for access to sco_get_sock_listen() return value. Fix possible UAF by holding sk refcount in sco_conn_ready() and making sco_get_sock_listen() increase refcount. Also recheck after lock_sock that the socket is still valid. Adjust conn->sk locking so it's protected also by lock_sock() of the associated socket if any.Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/89xxx/CVE-2026-89774.json">CVE-2026-89774</a>Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e37f6452d586b95c346a9abdd2fb80b67794f39Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50aae396dc30377bec8e3b181b8346f8fd38f7d8Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e3840578aaad1a296aab1eaaa89ea3b7d5cbae1Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7199c78c3a3e399a4dc439d845826793880ccedcReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73cb063f5ec6ca51eb1e246c6d332563002ac277Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d141d9b769bcd1b747898528c5023270cda040f2Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-89774"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-89774.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-89774 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>