CriticalCVE-2026-82329

    Potential authentication bypass leading to administrative access in Artifactory (CVE-2026-82329)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: BSI, CVE.org, pwn.watch

    What is affected, what to do

    JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update JFrog Artifactory to version 7.111.21, JFrog Artifactory to version 7.117.28, JFrog Artifactory to version 7.125.20. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • JFrog Artifactory lt *..7.111.21
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.117.0..7.117.28
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.125.0..7.125.20
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.133.0..7.133.29
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.146.0..7.146.38
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.161.0..7.161.20
    Fixed in
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.111.21
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.117.28
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.125.20
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.133.29
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.146.38
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.161.20

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: BSI, CVE.org, pwn.watch

    14.4 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 96.6

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    248.40 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    14.4 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    96.6
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 2 September 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-287

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable with no authentication and no user interaction. It affects the default configuration and leads directly to full administrative control, which puts it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Artifactory sits at the heart of the software supply chain: an attacker can poison artifacts, harvest CI/CD and cloud secrets, and execute code on the server via user plugins. CISA does not currently flag ransomware use, but the supply-chain leverage makes an incident here likely reportable under NIS2/KRITIS rules. Treat internet- or partner-reachable instances as critical with a 24-hour remediation target, and internal-only instances as high priority for the next emergency change window.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Cut exposure first: Restrict any Artifactory instance reachable from the internet or from untrusted segments to known build and admin networks at the firewall or reverse proxy. Check the default ports 8081/tcp (Artifactory) and 8082/tcp (router/UI), plus any fronting 443/tcp proxies.
      • Patch: Upgrade to the fixed release in your branch: 7.111.21, 7.117.28, 7.125.20, 7.133.29, 7.146.38 or 7.161.20. For branches not listed, a patch is available from the vendor — look up the exact version in the vendor advisory. In HA clusters, upgrade every node before reopening access.
      • Compromise check before reopening: Review users, groups, permission targets, access tokens, webhooks and user plugins ($JFROG_HOME/artifactory/var/etc/artifactory/plugins/) for unknown or recently modified entries. An attacker with admin rights can drop Groovy plugins to execute code on the server.
      • Rotate secrets: Treat everything stored in Artifactory as exposed. This covers admin passwords, access/identity tokens, API keys, LDAP/SAML/OIDC bind credentials, remote-repository credentials and CI/CD service accounts. If you find signs of compromise, also rotate the join key.
      • Verify artifact integrity: Compare checksums of critical release artifacts (container images, internal packages) against build records or signatures. Freeze deployments from affected repositories until they are verified. The supply-chain blast radius outweighs the host-level impact.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Expose Artifactory only through an authenticating reverse proxy (mTLS or a VPN/ZTNA gateway). Use ACLs to block direct access to 8081/8082 from client VLANs, and restrict server egress to the upstream registries you actually need.
      • WAF/reverse-proxy rules: Allow the admin API paths (/artifactory/api/security/*, /access/api/v1/*, /artifactory/api/system/*, /artifactory/api/plugins/*) only from the admin network. Return 403 and log the request for every other source.
      • Configuration hardening: The advisory states that the default configuration is affected. Disable anonymous access, rename or disable the default admin account, and enforce SSO with MFA for administration. Disable user plugin loading unless it is strictly required.
      • IAM/least privilege: Keep admin rights to a small set of named accounts. Scope CI tokens to individual repositories with short lifetimes, and revoke any tokens that never expire.
      • Endpoint hardening: Run Artifactory under a dedicated, unprivileged service account. Configure an EDR policy that blocks, or at least alerts on, the Java process spawning shells or LOLBins.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Access/request logs: Search artifactory-request.log and access-request.log for successful (2xx) calls to admin endpoints from external or unknown IPs, or with no preceding login. Example SPL: index=artifactory (uri_path="*/api/security/*" OR uri_path="*/access/api/v1/tokens*") status=2* NOT src_ip IN (admin_nets)
      • Audit events: In access-security-audit.log, look for new users with the admin flag, token creation with admin scopes, admin password changes and new permission targets. A Sigma rule should match event in (user_created, token_created, admin_flag_set) outside change windows.
      • EDR process ancestry: Flag java (Artifactory/Tomcat) spawning sh, bash, curl, wget, python or nc, or cmd.exe/powershell.exe on Windows (Sysmon EID 1). Example KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "java.exe" and InitiatingProcessCommandLine has "artifactory" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe")
      • File system: Alert on new .groovy files in the plugin directory and on changes to system.yaml or artifactory.config.xml (auditd: -w $JFROG_HOME/artifactory/var/etc -p wa -k jfrog_cfg; Sysmon EID 11 on Windows).
      • Network telemetry: In Zeek/Suricata HTTP logs, watch for external sources hitting admin APIs. Also flag unusually large outbound transfers (bulk artifact downloads) and newly configured remote-repository targets.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    JFrog Artifactory contains an authentication weakness that, under default configuration, may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to obtain administrative privileges.

    Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, pwn.watch, cvelistv5

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    jfrogartifactory
    • < 7.111.21
    • 7.146.0 – < 7.146.38
    • 7.133.0 – < 7.133.29
    • 7.161.0 – < 7.161.20
    • 7.125.0 – < 7.125.20
    • 7.117.0 – < 7.117.28
    • 7.133.0 – < 7.133.29
    • 7.161.0 – < 7.161.20
    • 7.117.0 – < 7.117.28
    • 7.125.0 – < 7.125.20
    • 7.111.4 – < 7.111.21
    • 7.146.0 – < 7.146.38
    • 7.111.21
    • 7.146.38
    • 7.133.29
    • 7.161.20
    • 7.125.20
    • 7.117.28
    • 7.133.29
    • 7.161.20
    • 7.117.28
    • 7.125.20
    • 7.111.21
    • 7.146.38
    JFrogArtifactory
    • < 7.146.38
    • < 7.133.29
    • < 7.125.20
    • < 7.7.111.21
    • < 7.161.20
    • < 7.117.28
    • 7.146.38
    • 7.133.29
    • 7.125.20
    • 7.7.111.21
    • 7.161.20
    • 7.117.28

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-287Improper Authentication

      Class

      When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-287

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329-PoC-Exploit (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329-JFrog-Artifactory- (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329-poc (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329-JFrog-Artifactory-Auth-Bypass (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)artifactory-CVE-2026-82329-poc.py (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)cve-2026-82329-jfrog-artifactory (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-82329 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • docs.jfrog.comJFrog Artifactory — CVE-2026-82329Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
    • docs.jfrog.comreleases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releasesVendor advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-82329government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: JFrog Artifactory: JFrog Artifactory Improper Authentication Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-82329pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-82329","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-02T17:44:21.886219Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-82329","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-02T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    2. CISA KEV entry updated9119a7d8…

      4 individual changes: Date Added, Due Date, Required Action, Vulnerability Name

      Show 4 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Date Addedadded
      —
      2026-09-02
      Due Dateadded
      —
      2026-09-02
      Required Actionadded
      —
      2026-09-02
      Vulnerability Nameadded
      —
      2026-09-02

      Source identifier: 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725

    3. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes

      Show 2 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-82329
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-82329","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-31T18:45:27.400176Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-82329","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-02T17:44:21.886219Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Linked advisories

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-82329
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-82329"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-82329.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-82329 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>