HighCVE-2026-80799

    Linux Kernel: Infinite Loop (CVE-2026-80799)

    Published Last modified Sources: Ubuntu, HKCERT, SUSE, Debian LTS, CVE.org, EUVD, Msrc Update Guide, BSI

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    Update Linux Kernel to version 5.10.267, Linux Kernel to version 4.20, Linux Kernel to version 5.5.

    Affected
    • Linux Kernel lt 5.10.188..5.10.267
    • Linux Kernel lt 4.19.291..4.20
    • Linux Kernel lt 5.4.251..5.5
    • Linux Kernel lt 5.15..5.15.218
    • Linux Kernel lt 5.16..6.1.185
    • Linux Kernel lt 6.2..6.6.154
    • Linux Kernel lt 6.7..6.12.106
    • Linux Kernel lt 6.13..6.18.47
    • Linux Kernel lt 6.19..7.1.11
    • Linux Kernel lt 7.2..7.2.1
    Fixed in
    • Linux Kernel 5.10.267
    • Linux Kernel 4.20
    • Linux Kernel 5.5
    • Linux Kernel 5.15.218
    • Linux Kernel 6.1.185
    • Linux Kernel 6.6.154
    • Linux Kernel 6.12.106
    • Linux Kernel 6.18.47
    • Linux Kernel 7.1.11
    • Linux Kernel 7.2.1
    • Linux Kernel 7.3

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.1

    XIEM Effective CVSS

    Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    8.1

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: Ubuntu, HKCERT, SUSE, Debian LTS, CVE.org, EUVD, Msrc Update Guide, BSI

    0.2 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 14.4

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    66.23 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.1 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.1
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.2 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    14.4
    Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

    nfc: llcp: fix OOB read and u8 offset wrap in TLV parsers

    nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv() and nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv() contain three related bugs in their TLV parsing loops:

    1. 'offset' is declared u8 but tlv_array_len is u16. When TLV data advances offset past 255 it silently wraps to zero, causing infinite loops or double-processing of buffer data.

    2. Before reading tlv[0] (type) and tlv[1] (length) there is no check that offset+2 <= tlv_array_len. A truncated TLV causes an OOB read of one byte past the buffer end.

    3. After reading the length field, the value bytes are accessed without checking offset+2+length <= tlv_array_len. A crafted length=0xFF on a short buffer causes up to 255 bytes of OOB read past the buffer end.

    Both functions are reachable without authentication via nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb() which feeds remote LLCP general bytes directly into nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv() with no additional validation.

    Fix all three issues by widening offset from u8 to u16 and adding bounds checks for both the TLV header and value field before each access.

    Source: Ubuntu Security Notices, HKCERT (CC BY 3.0 HK) · HKCERT rating: medium, suse_csaf, Debian LTS Advisories, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), ENISA EUVD, Microsoft Security Update Guide, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    LinuxLinux
    • 5.10.188 – < 5.10.267
    • 4.19.291 – < 4.20
    • 7.2 – < 7.2.1
    • 6.2 – < 6.6.154
    • 5.15 – < 5.15.218
    • 6.7 – < 6.12.106
    • —
    • 6.13 – < 6.18.47
    • 6.19 – < 7.1.11
    • 5.4.251 – < 5.5
    • 5.16 – < 6.1.185
    • 5.10.267
    • 4.20
    • 7.2.1
    • 6.6.154
    • 5.15.218
    • 6.12.106
    • 7.3
    • 6.18.47
    • 7.1.11
    • 5.5
    • 6.1.185
    Red HatOpenShift
    • Container Platform
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebianlinuxbookworm
    Linuxubuntulinuxjammy
    Linuxubuntulinuxnoble
    Linuxubuntulinuxresolute
    Linuxdebianlinux-6.12bookworm
    Linuxubuntulinux-awsjammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-awsnoble
    Linuxubuntulinux-awsresolute
    Linuxubuntulinux-aws-5.15focal
    Linuxubuntulinux-aws-6.8jammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-aws-7.0noble
    Linuxubuntulinux-aws-fipsjammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-aws-fipsnoble
    Linuxubuntulinux-azurejammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-azurenoble
    Linuxubuntulinux-azureresolute
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-5.15focal
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-6.8jammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fdejammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fdenoble
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fderesolute
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fde-5.15focal
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fde-6.8jammy
    Linuxubuntulinux-azure-fde-7.0noble

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedLinux

      1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/80xxx/CVE-2026-80799.json">CVE-2026-80799</a>

      Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

    2. ReceivedLinux

      Show 11 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Descriptionadded
      —
      In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: fix OOB read and u8 offset wrap in TLV parsers nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv() and nfc_llcp_parse_connection_tlv() contain three related bugs in their TLV parsing loops: 1. 'offset' is declared u8 but tlv_array_len is u16. When TLV data advances offset past 255 it silently wraps to zero, causing infinite loops or double-processing of buffer data. 2. Before reading tlv[0] (type) and tlv[1] (length) there is no check that offset+2 <= tlv_array_len. A truncated TLV causes an OOB read of one byte past the buffer end. 3. After reading the length field, the value bytes are accessed without checking offset+2+length <= tlv_array_len. A crafted length=0xFF on a short buffer causes up to 255 bytes of OOB read past the buffer end. Both functions are reachable without authentication via nfc_llcp_set_remote_gb() which feeds remote LLCP general bytes directly into nfc_llcp_parse_gb_tlv() with no additional validation. Fix all three issues by widening offset from u8 to u16 and adding bounds checks for both the TLV header and value field before each access.
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/80xxx/CVE-2026-80799.json">CVE-2026-80799</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c1456fe09ab1a5a9fe1d8339ca6d509589b56e1
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d239590d1845a706304833d40dd6d4fec20ad88
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/382eaa770335acf4f16a5a55524500f2bb4207df
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78b20c8eeacd2e44a2d8a4cb5316d3c521d90911
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f6f3d087c67a4346189ef2c36481455bbc59a74
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/875285a165fd3b402de2ab3be0deb355d6f4caf5
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c47d667963542c3cf8e3007b7f10c0904d08238
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a209334ed929941b20810c17c3a507445b0a7c85
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e84cdfdc4a6c88e8b751144458f2e04e24415a28

      Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-80799
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-80799"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-80799.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-80799 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>