MaxKey 4.1.12 DefaultRedirectResolver OAuth Authorization Code Theft (CVE-2026-67345)
Published Last modified Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
MaxKey through 4.1.12, fixed in commit ddbb72f, contains an insufficient redirect URI validation vulnerability in DefaultRedirectResolver.hostMatches() that allows remote attackers to hijack OAuth 2.0 authorization codes by supplying a crafted redirect_uri whose hostname suffix matches a registered URI without proper dot-boundary anchoring. Attackers who control a domain ending with the registered redirect URI hostname can social-engineer victims into clicking a crafted authorization URL, causing the authorization code to be issued to the attacker-controlled URI and exchanged for an access token granting access to the victim's identity.
An exploit is publicly available. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.
- Affected
- Dromara MaxKey
lte *..4.1.12
- Dromara MaxKey
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v4
8.1
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 46.9
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 81.91 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.1
CVSS v4
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 46.9
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 30 July 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-183
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
MaxKey through 4.1.12, fixed in commit ddbb72f, contains an insufficient redirect URI validation vulnerability in DefaultRedirectResolver.hostMatches() that allows remote attackers to hijack OAuth 2.0 authorization codes by supplying a crafted redirect_uri whose hostname suffix matches a registered URI without proper dot-boundary anchoring. Attackers who control a domain ending with the registered redirect URI hostname can social-engineer victims into clicking a crafted authorization URL, causing the authorization code to be issued to the attacker-controlled URI and exchanged for an access token granting access to the victim's identity.
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| dromara | MaxKey |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-183Permissive List of Allowed Inputs
Base
The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are explicitly allowed by policy because the inputs are assumed to be safe, but the list is too permissive - that is, it allows an input that is unsafe, leading to resultant weaknesses.
Entry at MITRE CWE-183
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| Reference tagged as exploit | github.com (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- github.comResearcher DisclosureTechnical description, Exploit, Issue tracking
- github.comPatch CommitPatch
- vulncheck.comadvisories/maxkey-defaultredirectresolver-oauth-authorization-c…Third-party advisory
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-67345","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-30T17:28:57.453169Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedVulnCheck
CVSS V4.0: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness type: CWE-183
Description added or changed
Show 8 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —MaxKeyDescription added —MaxKey through 4.1.12, fixed in commit ddbb72f, contains an insufficient redirect URI validation vulnerability in DefaultRedirectResolver.hostMatches() that allows remote attackers to hijack OAuth 2.0 authorization codes by supplying a crafted redirect_uri whose hostname suffix matches a registered URI without proper dot-boundary anchoring. Attackers who control a domain ending with the registered redirect URI hostname can social-engineer victims into clicking a crafted authorization URL, causing the authorization code to be issued to the attacker-controlled URI and exchanged for an access token granting access to the victim's identity.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-183Reference added —https://github.com/dromara/MaxKey/commit/ddbb72fb24ab8e66aa422fb14b1177330bcffb45Reference added —https://github.com/dromara/MaxKey/issues/269Reference added —https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/maxkey-defaultredirectresolver-oauth-authorization-code-theftSource identifier: disclosure@vulncheck.com
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-67345"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-67345.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-67345 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>