CriticalCVE-2026-66384

    Authenticated users may write data outside the intended Docker cache path (CVE-2026-66384)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch, BSI

    What is affected, what to do

    An authenticated user may write data outside the intended Docker cache path under specific remote-repository conditions.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update JFrog Artifactory to version 7.146.35, JFrog Artifactory to version 7.161.16. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • JFrog Artifactory lt *..7.146.35
    • JFrog Artifactory lt 7.161.0..7.161.16
    Fixed in
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.146.35
    • JFrog Artifactory 7.161.16

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    5.3

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    5.3

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch, BSI

    0.7 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 51.7

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    170.85 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    5.3 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    5.3
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.7 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    51.7
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 27 August 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-22

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    The flaw is network-reachable but requires an authenticated account and specific remote-repository conditions, which makes it harder to exploit. Its impact is purely on integrity, and that is exactly what appeals to attackers who already hold stolen developer or CI credentials and want to tamper with the software supply chain. Statistical exploitation likelihood is moderate, and CISA lists no known ransomware use. Even so, KEV listing combined with Artifactory's role as a central artefact hub justifies high priority. Organisations with large user bases, third-party contractors or internet-exposed instances should patch within days. Internal-only instances with a strict permission model can follow an accelerated regular patch cycle.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Patch self-managed instances: Upgrade Artifactory to the fixed build for your release line: 7.146.35 for the 7.146.x line, or 7.161.16 for the 7.161.x line (7.161.0 up to, but not including, 7.161.16 is affected). Record GET /artifactory/api/system/version before and after the upgrade, and confirm every node in an HA cluster.
      • SaaS tenants: Verify the instance runs 7.164.0 or later. If it does not, ask JFrog support to confirm the rollout and keep the evidence for your NIS2 records.
      • Inventory Docker remote repositories: List every docker remote repository (GET /artifactory/api/repositories?type=remote&packageType=docker). Until you patch, disable unused remotes or remove them from virtual repositories. Restrict upstream URLs to trusted registries such as Docker Hub or your internal registry.
      • Freeze privileges: Reduce repository-level "Manage"/"Admin" rights and the ability to create or modify remote repositories to the minimum. Revoke and reissue access tokens and API keys for accounts that hold deploy or cache rights on Docker remotes without a clear need.
      • Kick off an integrity check: The impact is integrity (writes outside the cache path), so look for unexpected, recently modified files under $JFROG_HOME/artifactory/var/ that sit outside the Docker cache and filestore layout (e.g. find $JFROG_HOME -newer <reference-file> -type f). Pay particular attention to config files (etc/, system.yaml) and plugin directories.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • IAM / least privilege: Disable anonymous access. Grant Docker remote repositories only to groups with a documented need. Limit CI/CD service accounts to read-only on remotes, and keep deploy/annotate rights on local repositories only.
      • Configuration hardening: Enable "Block Mismatching Mime Types" and tight include/exclude patterns on Docker remotes. Point remote URLs only at an approved allowlist of registries. Manage repository configuration through infrastructure-as-code with mandatory peer review.
      • Host hardening: Run Artifactory as the unprivileged artifactory user, never as root. In containers, mount configuration paths read-only and keep only data and filestore paths writable. Apply an SELinux/AppArmor profile that confines JVM writes to var/data, var/backup and the cache directory.
      • Network segmentation: Expose the UI and Docker endpoints (typically 443 via reverse proxy, 8081/8082 internally) only to build networks and developer VLANs. Do not expose the management UI directly to the internet. Route Artifactory egress through a proxy that permits only approved upstream registries.
      • Reverse proxy / WAF: At the fronting Nginx/HAProxy/WAF, deny requests to /v2/ and /artifactory/api/docker/ that contain traversal sequences (../, ..%2f, %2e%2e, %252e, ..\). ModSecurity idea: SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx (?i)(\.\.|%2e%2e|%252e)(/|%2f|%5c)" "phase:1,deny,id:1066384,msg:'Artifactory Docker path traversal'".
      • Supply-chain guardrail: Enforce signature verification (Cosign/Notation) in deployment pipelines for images pulled from Artifactory, so tampered artefacts cannot reach production silently.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Artifactory request log (var/log/artifactory-request.log) or proxy access log: look for authenticated Docker API calls that contain traversal patterns. SPL: index=artifactory sourcetype=artifactory:request uri="*/v2/*" (uri="*..*" OR uri="*%2e%2e*" OR uri="*%252e*") | stats count by user, remote_ip, uri
      • Linux auditd: Watch for writes by the Artifactory JVM outside the expected data paths. Rules: -w $JFROG_HOME/artifactory/var/etc -p wa -k artifactory_cfg and -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S openat -F auid!=unset -F uid=artifactory -F dir=/opt -F success=1 -k art_write. Alert on hits outside var/data and var/work.
      • Configuration changes: Use the Artifactory access audit log (access-audit.log) or event webhooks to flag new or modified Docker remote repositories and changed remote URLs. Treat changes by accounts that do not normally perform admin actions as high priority.
      • EDR / process ancestry: Escalate any executable, script or Groovy plugin (etc/artifactory/plugins/*.groovy) newly written by the Artifactory Java process, and any child processes that follow (java → sh/bash).
      • Zeek/Suricata: Detect outbound connections from Artifactory to registry hosts that are not on the allowlist (HTTP /v2/ paths to unknown destinations). A deviation from the upstream allowlist may indicate a tampered remote repository configuration.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    An authenticated user may write data outside the intended Docker cache path under specific remote-repository conditions.

    Source: NVD (NIST), pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    jfrogartifactory
    • < 7.146.35
    • 7.161.0 – < 7.161.16
    • 7.161.0 – < 7.161.16
    • < 7.146.35
    • 7.146.35
    • 7.161.16
    • 7.161.16
    • 7.146.35
    JFrogArtifactory SaaS
    • < 7.164.0
    • 7.164.0
    JFrogArtifactory Self-Managed
    • < 7.161.16
    • 7.161.16

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-22

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-66384 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • docs.jfrog.comJFrog Artifactory — CVE-2026-66384Vendor advisory, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
    • docs.jfrog.comreleases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releasesVendor advisory, Release notes, Vendor advisory
    • cdn.openai.compdf/67869394-cb91-4c12-888c-5cbd85c7814c/OpenAI-Hugging-Face In…Third-party advisory, Technical description
    • openai.comindex/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-aheadThird-party advisory, Third-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-66384government-resource, US government resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: JFrog Artifactory: JFrog Artifactory Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-66384pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. NVD analysis modifiedNVD

      Show 3 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Reference typeadded
      —
      CISA-ADP: https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/67869394-cb91-4c12-888c-5cbd85c7814c/OpenAI-Hugging-Face%20Incident-Technical-Report.pdf Types: Technical Description
      Reference typeadded
      —
      CISA-ADP: https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-ahead/ Types: Third Party Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      CISA-ADP: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-66384 Types: US Government Resource

      Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-66384","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-27T17:44:21.737733Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-66384","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-27T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    3. Record modifiedjfrog.com

      Show 6 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories
      Referenceremoved
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases Types: Release Notes, Vendor Advisory
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories Types: Vendor Advisory
      —

      Source identifier: reefs@jfrog.com

    4. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      Show 4 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/67869394-cb91-4c12-888c-5cbd85c7814c/OpenAI-Hugging-Face%20Incident-Technical-Report.pdf
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-ahead/
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-66384
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2026-66384","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-12T18:42:06.743560Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2026-66384","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-27T17:44:21.737733Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    2 NVD translations into other languages are hidden.

    Linked advisories

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-66384
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-66384"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-66384.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-66384 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>