JetBrains TeamCity Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability (CVE-2026-63077)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: BSI, CVE.org, pwn.watch
What is affected, what to do
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 unauthenticated remote code execution was possible via the agent polling protocol
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update JetBrains TeamCity to version 2026.1.3, JetBrains TeamCity to version 2025.11.7. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- JetBrains TeamCity
lt 2026.1..2026.1.3 - JetBrains TeamCity
lt *..2025.11.7
- JetBrains TeamCity
- Fixed in
- JetBrains TeamCity
2026.1.3 - JetBrains TeamCity
2025.11.7
- JetBrains TeamCity
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI, CVE.org, pwn.watch
93.6 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.84
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 275.60 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 93.6 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.84
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-502
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is exploitable over the network without authentication or user interaction and gives full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability. It ranks among the CVEs most likely to be exploited, and CISA records its use in ransomware campaigns. CI/CD servers are high-value targets because they concentrate source code, deployment credentials and signing keys, which lets attackers pivot into production and tamper with the software supply chain. Treat internet-exposed instances as a drop-everything emergency to be handled within hours. Internal-only instances still warrant high priority and should be patched in the next maintenance window, within days at most.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Find and cut exposure now: Inventory every TeamCity server (default web port 8111, or 443 behind a reverse proxy). Immediately block internet access or restrict it to known build-agent source IPs. The attack vector is the agent polling protocol, so any publicly reachable server should be treated as at imminent risk.
- Apply the vendor fix: Per the CVE description, versions before 2026.1.3 and 2025.11.7 are affected. Upgrade to 2026.1.3 (2026.1 branch) or 2025.11.7 (2025.11 branch) or later. The affected-product data is ambiguous, so confirm the exact fixed build in JetBrains' security bulletin. Take a backup and a forensic snapshot of the server before upgrading.
- Hunt for compromise before restoring trust: CISA flags known ransomware use. Check for newly created admin accounts, unknown authorised build agents, modified build configurations and new access tokens. If anything looks off, isolate the host and open an incident, and assess NIS2 reporting obligations.
- Rotate secrets: On any sign of compromise, and as a precaution for internet-exposed instances, replace every secret held by TeamCity: VCS credentials, SSH deploy keys, cloud and registry tokens, code-signing certificates, password-type parameters and personal access tokens.
- Protect the supply chain: Treat artefacts built since the earliest possible exposure date as untrusted. Hold releases from that window until the integrity of the build environment is confirmed.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Place the TeamCity server in a dedicated CI/CD segment. Allow inbound traffic only from build agents (IP allowlist) and from admins via VPN or a jump host. Restrict server egress to VCS, artefact repositories and update sources (default deny) to frustrate reverse shells and exfiltration.
- Reverse proxy/WAF: Forward agent communication paths only for known agent IPs and return 403 to everyone else. Block requests whose body carries Java serialisation markers (magic bytes
AC ED 00 05, or Base64rO0AB), and log unusually large or binary POST bodies sent to agent endpoints. - IPS: Enable Suricata/Snort rules that detect Java deserialisation payloads (
rO0ABor|AC ED 00 05|in HTTP bodies to the TeamCity port). Deploy CVE-2026-63077-specific signatures as soon as your IPS vendor ships them. - Endpoint hardening: Run the TeamCity service under an unprivileged service account, never as SYSTEM or root. Use EDR or AppLocker/WDAC to block, or at minimum alert on, the server's Java process spawning shells (cmd.exe, powershell.exe, bash, sh). Do not run builds on the server node itself.
- IAM/least privilege: Minimise the number of TeamCity system administrators and enforce SSO with MFA for web login. Give builds only short-lived, narrowly scoped credentials; no standing cloud-admin keys.
- Configuration: Disable automatic authorisation of new agents. Approve each agent manually and remove unused agent pools.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Windows EID 4688 / EDR): Alert when the TeamCity server Java process spawns shells or LOLBins. Example KQL:
DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "java.exe" and InitiatingProcessCommandLine has "teamcity" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","certutil.exe","curl.exe","bitsadmin.exe"). On Linux, use auditdexecverecords with parentjavaandexein/bin/sh,/bin/bash,curlorwget. - Application logs: In
teamcity-server.log,teamcity-auth.logand the audit log, look for new users or "System administrator" role grants, new access tokens, plugin uploads, and agent registrations from unknown hosts. Also review deserialisation errors orClassNotFoundExceptionentries around agent requests. - Web/proxy logs: Flag POSTs to agent endpoints from IPs that are not in the agent inventory. Example SPL:
index=proxy dest_port IN (8111,443) uri_path="*agent*" NOT src_ip IN (agent_allowlist) | stats count by src_ip, uri_path. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Watch for new outbound connections from the TeamCity server to unfamiliar destinations, such as tunnelling or paste services, or binary downloads shortly after inbound agent traffic. Also watch for Java serialisation signatures in
http.log/files.log. - File system (Sysmon EID 11 / auditd): Look for new JAR, script or EXE files in TeamCity plugin, temp or webapp directories, and for new scheduled tasks, services or cron entries on the server.
- Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Windows EID 4688 / EDR): Alert when the TeamCity server Java process spawns shells or LOLBins. Example KQL:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 unauthenticated remote code execution was possible via the agent polling protocol
Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| JetBrains | TeamCity |
|
|
| jetbrains | teamcity |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-502Deserialization of Untrusted Data
Base
The product deserializes untrusted data without sufficiently ensuring that the resulting data will be valid.
Entry at MITRE CWE-502
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-63077 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | teamcity-cve-2026-63077-remediation (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-63077 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | teamcity-CVE-2026-63077-pcap (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-63077 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | teamcity-cve-2026-63077-remediation (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- jetbrains.comprivacy-security/issues-fixedVendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-63077government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: JetBrains TeamCity: JetBrains TeamCity Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- blog.jetbrains.comJetBrains TeamCity — CVE-2026-63077pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-63077pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2026-63077","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T17:46:04.215479Z"}{"id":"CVE-2026-63077","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-27T00:00:00+00:00"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- JetBrains TeamCity (before 2025.11.7; 2026.1 – before 2026.1.3)
Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:jetbrains:teamcity:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 2025.11.7 *cpe:2.3:a:jetbrains:teamcity:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 2026.1 up to (excluding) 2026.1.3Reference type added —JetBrains s.r.o.: https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed/ Types: Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-63077 Types: US Government ResourceSource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
CISA KEV entry updated9119a7d8…
4 individual changes: Date Added, Due Date, Required Action, Vulnerability Name
Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Date Added added —2026-08-05Due Date added —2026-08-05Required Action added —2026-08-05Vulnerability Name added —2026-08-05Source identifier: 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-63077SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2026-63077","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-27T00:00:00+00:00"}{"id":"CVE-2026-63077","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T17:46:04.215479Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedjetbrains.com
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-502
Description added or changed
New references:Show 5 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —TeamCityDescription added —In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 unauthenticated remote code execution was possible via the agent polling protocolCVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-502Reference added —https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed/Source identifier: cve@jetbrains.com
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Linked advisories
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63077"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63077.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63077 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>