Asterisk: CVE-2022-37325 fix is absent from current chan_ooh323 Q.931 party-number parser (CVE-2026-57186)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. From 21.0.0-pre1 until Asterisk 21.12.3, 22.10.1, 23.4.1 and Certified Asterisk 22.8-cert3, the `chan_ooh323` `Q.931 party-number parser` lacks the `CVE-2022-37325` fix because that fix was never forward-ported from Asterisk 20 to later versions.
The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.
- Affected
- Asterisk
gte 21.0.0-pre1, < 21.12.3..* - Asterisk Certified-asterisk
gte 22.8-cert1-pre1, < 22.8-cert3..*
- Asterisk
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI, CVE.org
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 86.47 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.7
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 28 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-839
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. From 21.0.0-pre1 until Asterisk 21.12.3, 22.10.1, 23.4.1 and Certified Asterisk 22.8-cert3, the `chan_ooh323` `Q.931 party-number parser` lacks the `CVE-2022-37325` fix because that fix was never forward-ported from Asterisk 20 to later versions. Malformed Q.931 elements in an `OOH323 request` can therefore crash Asterisk. This issue affects Asterisk versions greater than 20. The `chan_ooh323` addon channel driver must be explicitly compiled and installed, which is not the default, and its port must be publicly reachable. This issue is fixed in Asterisk 21.12.3, 22.10.1, 23.4.1 and Certified Asterisk 22.8-cert3.
Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| asterisk | asterisk |
|
|
| asterisk | certified-asterisk |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-839Numeric Range Comparison Without Minimum Check
Base
The product checks a value to ensure that it is less than or equal to a maximum, but it does not also verify that the value is greater than or equal to the minimum.
Entry at MITRE CWE-839
References & sources
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/security/advisories/GHSA-h5hv-jmgj-92q2x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/commit/07b9740cbc371ffa7936cf368089fd073250ea…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/commit/0e776a837106d5d0d14503a533883379310451…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/commit/42d3552d2ac0efbb68c9ec7ade898b6de0bfa0…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/commit/46c6c652d1de9bfbb061fab0b1f681cf606609…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/commit/62a7a7037b1a145cabf95895b119cbae4d3c5a…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.12.3x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/22.10.1x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/23.4.1x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/certified-22.8-cert3x_refsource_MISC
- github.comasterisk/asterisk/tree/24.0.0-pre1x_refsource_MISC
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-57186","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-28T15:54:28.501669Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-839
Description added or changed
New references:- https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/07b9740cbc371ffa7936cf368089fd073250ea7c
- https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/0e776a837106d5d0d14503a53388337931045164
- https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/42d3552d2ac0efbb68c9ec7ade898b6de0bfa033
- https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/46c6c652d1de9bfbb061fab0b1f681cf60660998
and 7 more references
Show 15 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —Asterisk is an open source private branch exchange and telephony toolkit. From 21.0.0-pre1 until Asterisk 21.12.3, 22.10.1, 23.4.1 and Certified Asterisk 22.8-cert3, the `chan_ooh323` `Q.931 party-number parser` lacks the `CVE-2022-37325` fix because that fix was never forward-ported from Asterisk 20 to later versions. Malformed Q.931 elements in an `OOH323 request` can therefore crash Asterisk. This issue affects Asterisk versions greater than 20. The `chan_ooh323` addon channel driver must be explicitly compiled and installed, which is not the default, and its port must be publicly reachable. This issue is fixed in Asterisk 21.12.3, 22.10.1, 23.4.1 and Certified Asterisk 22.8-cert3.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-839Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/57xxx/CVE-2026-57186.json">CVE-2026-57186</a>Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/07b9740cbc371ffa7936cf368089fd073250ea7cReference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/0e776a837106d5d0d14503a53388337931045164Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/42d3552d2ac0efbb68c9ec7ade898b6de0bfa033Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/46c6c652d1de9bfbb061fab0b1f681cf60660998Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/commit/62a7a7037b1a145cabf95895b119cbae4d3c5a4fReference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.12.3Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/22.10.1Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/23.4.1Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/certified-22.8-cert3Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/security/advisories/GHSA-h5hv-jmgj-92q2Reference added —https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/tree/24.0.0-pre1Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-57186"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-57186.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-57186 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>