Yamcs: Missing Authorization (CVE-2026-55548)
Published Last modified Sources: Hersteller, CVE.org, OSV
What is affected, what to do
Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, the PacketsApi.exportPackets endpoint in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/api/PacketsApi.java failed to enforce object-level ReadPacket privileges when a request omitted specific packet names: with an empty name list the ctx.checkObjectPrivileges(ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, nameSet) call passed over an empty set, no WHERE pname IN filter was applied to the resulting SELECT * FROM tm query, and the onTuple handler streamed every retrieved packet without any per-row authorization check, so a low-privileged or zero-privilege authenticated user could dump the entire raw telemetry packet archive and bypass the role-based access control model.
Update Yamcs to version 5.12.8.
- Affected
- Yamcs
gte 5.13.0, < 5.13.2..* - Yamcs
lt *..5.12.8
- Yamcs
- Fixed in
- Yamcs
5.12.8
- Yamcs
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
4.3
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
4.3
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Hersteller, CVE.org, OSV
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 29.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 49.37 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 4.3 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 4.3
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 29.8
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 16 July 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-284, CWE-862
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Yamcs is a mission control framework. Prior to 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, the PacketsApi.exportPackets endpoint in yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/api/PacketsApi.java failed to enforce object-level ReadPacket privileges when a request omitted specific packet names: with an empty name list the ctx.checkObjectPrivileges(ObjectPrivilegeType.ReadPacket, nameSet) call passed over an empty set, no WHERE pname IN filter was applied to the resulting SELECT * FROM tm query, and the onTuple handler streamed every retrieved packet without any per-row authorization check, so a low-privileged or zero-privilege authenticated user could dump the entire raw telemetry packet archive and bypass the role-based access control model. This issue is fixed in versions 5.12.8 and 5.13.2, which enforce per-packet ReadPacket checks in exportPackets.
Source: GitHub Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| yamcs | yamcs |
|
|
| spaceapplications | yamcs |
|
|
| maven | org.yamcs:yamcs-core |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-284Improper Access Control
Pillar
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Entry at MITRE CWE-284CWE-862Missing Authorization
Class
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Entry at MITRE CWE-862
References & sources
- github.comyamcs/yamcs/security/advisories/GHSA-8xjq-pr36-ccgfx_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.comyamcs/yamcs/commit/b566beceba98cc35514b0e1519be126b8c5a0438x_refsource_MISC
- github.comyamcs/yamcs/commit/c743cc3acf5b5c53ff5181b94eacc21340f70dd9x_refsource_MISC
- github.comyamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.12.8x_refsource_MISC
- github.comyamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.13.2x_refsource_MISC
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55548advisory
- github.comyamcs/yamcspackage
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- Spaceapplications Yamcs (before 5.12.8; 5.13.0 – before 5.13.2)
New references:- https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/b566beceba98cc35514b0e1519be126b8c5a0438
- https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/c743cc3acf5b5c53ff5181b94eacc21340f70dd9
- https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.12.8
- https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.13.2
and 1 more reference
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:spaceapplications:yamcs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 5.12.8 *cpe:2.3:a:spaceapplications:yamcs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 5.13.0 up to (excluding) 5.13.2Reference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/b566beceba98cc35514b0e1519be126b8c5a0438 Types: PatchReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/commit/c743cc3acf5b5c53ff5181b94eacc21340f70dd9 Types: PatchReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.12.8 Types: Release NotesReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/releases/tag/yamcs-5.13.2 Types: Release NotesReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/security/advisories/GHSA-8xjq-pr36-ccgf Types: Exploit, Mitigation, Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/security/advisories/GHSA-8xjq-pr36-ccgf Types: Exploit, Mitigation, Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-55548"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-55548.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-55548 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>