CUPS fax option values bypass the CVE-2026-34980 control-character sanitizer (incomplete fix) (CVE-2026-55467)
Published Last modified Sources: Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
OpenPrinting CUPS is an open source printing system for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Prior to 2.4.20, the cupsdCreateJob option-string builder in scheduler/job.c maps attacker-controlled destination-uri and pre-dial-string values from a configured fax queue to the phone and faxPrefix options.
An exploit is publicly available. Update OpenPrinting CUPS to version 2.4.20.
- Affected
- OpenPrinting CUPS
lt *..2.4.20
- OpenPrinting CUPS
- Fixed in
- OpenPrinting CUPS
2.4.20
- OpenPrinting CUPS
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
2.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
2.5
CVSS v3
Severity Low on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org, BSI
0.2 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 7.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Low
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 42.99 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 2.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 2.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.2 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 7.8
- Low — this CVE sits in the lower 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 15 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-93, CWE-94, CWE-150
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
OpenPrinting CUPS is an open source printing system for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Prior to 2.4.20, the cupsdCreateJob option-string builder in scheduler/job.c maps attacker-controlled destination-uri and pre-dial-string values from a configured fax queue to the phone and faxPrefix options. Unlike ordinary IPP job attributes, these mapped fax values bypass the control-character sanitizer and are copied directly into the filter options argument. A user permitted to submit a job can therefore inject control characters into the downstream option stream. The reporter states that a downstream fax filter passing these values to a shell or modem command could execute code as lp, while the maintainer states that CUPS has no confidentiality or integrity impact because the only known code-executing filter is optional Foomatic and addressed separately, leaving possible disruption of the affected queue. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.20.
Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenPrinting | cups |
|
|
| openprinting | cups |
|
|
| Open Source | CUPS |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-93Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
Base
The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.
Entry at MITRE CWE-93CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Entry at MITRE CWE-94CWE-150Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences
Variant
The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as escape, meta, or control character sequences when they are sent to a downstream component.
Entry at MITRE CWE-150
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| Reference tagged as exploit | github.com (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- github.comOpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7x_refsource_CONFIRM, Exploit, Vendor advisory
- github.comOpenPrinting/cups/commit/0cf4e7814d6810ed3c454222bce3aa342d5416…x_refsource_MISC, Patch
- github.comOpenPrinting/cups/commit/a9e7e7a3a019d0fa063d29409d3f82e4c6d5a0…x_refsource_MISC, Patch
- github.comOpenPrinting/cups/releases/tag/v2.4.20x_refsource_MISC, Release notes
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- OpenPrinting CUPS (before 2.4.20)
New references:- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/0cf4e7814d6810ed3c454222bce3aa342d541681
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/a9e7e7a3a019d0fa063d29409d3f82e4c6d5a008
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/releases/tag/v2.4.20
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7
Show 6 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:openprinting:cups:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 2.4.20Reference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/0cf4e7814d6810ed3c454222bce3aa342d541681 Types: PatchReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/a9e7e7a3a019d0fa063d29409d3f82e4c6d5a008 Types: PatchReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/releases/tag/v2.4.20 Types: Release NotesReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7 Types: Exploit, Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7 Types: Exploit, Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness type: CWE-94, CWE-93, CWE-150
Description added or changed
New references:- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/0cf4e7814d6810ed3c454222bce3aa342d541681
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/a9e7e7a3a019d0fa063d29409d3f82e4c6d5a008
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/releases/tag/v2.4.20
- https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7
Show 10 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —OpenPrinting CUPS is an open source printing system for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Prior to 2.4.20, the cupsdCreateJob option-string builder in scheduler/job.c maps attacker-controlled destination-uri and pre-dial-string values from a configured fax queue to the phone and faxPrefix options. Unlike ordinary IPP job attributes, these mapped fax values bypass the control-character sanitizer and are copied directly into the filter options argument. A user permitted to submit a job can therefore inject control characters into the downstream option stream. The reporter states that a downstream fax filter passing these values to a shell or modem command could execute code as lp, while the maintainer states that CUPS has no confidentiality or integrity impact because the only known code-executing filter is optional Foomatic and addressed separately, leaving possible disruption of the affected queue. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.20.CVSS added —AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:LWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-94Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-93Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-150Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/55xxx/CVE-2026-55467.json">CVE-2026-55467</a>Reference added —https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/0cf4e7814d6810ed3c454222bce3aa342d541681Reference added —https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/commit/a9e7e7a3a019d0fa063d29409d3f82e4c6d5a008Reference added —https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/releases/tag/v2.4.20Reference added —https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: proof of concept, automatable: no
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://github.com/OpenPrinting/cups/security/advisories/GHSA-69qc-prxg-h2c7SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-55467","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-15T17:49:04.144102Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-55467"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-55467.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-55467 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>