Apache Camel: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CVE-2026-48203)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, BSI, OSV, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in the Apache Camel Solr component. A remote unauthenticated attacker can inject Solr query parameters and document fields into requests by utilizing specific header prefixes (SolrParam. and SolrField.) that bypass the HTTP header filter.
An exploit is publicly available. Update Apache Camel to version 4.14.8, Apache Camel to version 4.18.3, Apache Camel to version 4.21.0.
- Affected
- Apache Camel
lt 4.0.0..4.14.8 - Apache Camel
lt 4.15.0..4.18.3 - Apache Camel
lt 4.19.0..4.21.0
- Apache Camel
- Fixed in
- Apache Camel
4.14.8 - Apache Camel
4.18.3 - Apache Camel
4.21.0
- Apache Camel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.1
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.1
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, BSI, OSV, CVE.org
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 84.55 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.1 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.1
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.7
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 6 July 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-20, CWE-74, CWE-918
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in the Apache Camel Solr component. A remote unauthenticated attacker can inject Solr query parameters and document fields into requests by utilizing specific header prefixes (SolrParam. and SolrField.) that bypass the HTTP header filter. This improper input validation allows for Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), enabling the attacker to force the Solr server to make requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing internal services or cloud metadata endpoints. Additionally, attackers can inject arbitrary fields into indexed documents.
Source: redhat_csaf, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Camel |
|
|
| apache | camel |
|
|
| Apache | Camel |
|
|
| maven | org.apache.camel:camel-solr |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-20Improper Input Validation
Class
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
Entry at MITRE CWE-20CWE-74Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Class
The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.
Entry at MITRE CWE-74CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Base
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
Entry at MITRE CWE-918
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-48203 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48203advisory
- github.comapache/camel/pull/23410web
- github.comapache/camel/pull/23483web
- github.comapache/camel/pull/23489web
- github.comapache/camel/commit/4578a9014a6b7a914cf16baf2c5bf62a7b163a88web
- github.comapache/camel/commit/cfc0d51f015b3112eae4ce0968d045f00e95c796web
- github.comapache/camel/commit/f79cbe3f8bc3fe1095d8492e9ef321289451d457web
- github.comapache/camelpackage
- github.comapache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.14.8web
- github.comapache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.18.3web
- github.comapache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.21.0web
- issues.apache.orgjira/browse/CAMEL-23597web
- camel.apache.orgsecurity/CVE-2026-48203.htmlweb, Vendor advisory, Mitigation, Vendor advisory
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2026/07/05/17web, Mailing list, Third-party advisory
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel (4.0.0 – before 4.14.8; 4.15.0 – before 4.18.3; 4.19.0 – before 4.21.0)
Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.0.0 up to (excluding) 4.14.8 *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.15.0 up to (excluding) 4.18.3 *cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 4.19.0 up to (excluding) 4.21.0Reference type added —Apache Software Foundation: http://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-48203.html Types: Mitigation, Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —CVE: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/05/17 Types: Mailing List, Third Party AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-48203","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-06T19:17:14.778965Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCVE Program
New references:Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/05/17Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
ReceivedApache
Weakness type: CWE-20, CWE-74, CWE-918
Description added or changed
New references:Show 6 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Apache CamelDescription added —Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Improper Input Validation, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel Solr component. The camel-solr producer copies Exchange message headers whose names begin with the SolrParam. prefix into the parameters of the Solr request, and headers whose names begin with the SolrField. prefix into the fields of the indexed Solr document. The prefix constants (SolrConstants.HEADER_PARAM_PREFIX / HEADER_FIELD_PREFIX) were the plain strings SolrParam. / SolrField.. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a solr: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set SolrParam.* headers to inject arbitrary Solr request parameters - including shards or stream.url, which cause the Solr server to issue server-side requests to an attacker-chosen URL (server-side request forgery, for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint), or qt to reach administrative request handlers - and set SolrField.* headers to inject arbitrary fields into indexed documents. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Solr parameters or fields via the raw header prefixes must use CamelSolrParam. / CamelSolrField. instead of SolrParam. / SolrField.. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the SolrParam.* and SolrField.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the solr: producer, and set the required Solr parameters and fields from a trusted source in the route.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-20Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-74Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-918Reference added —http://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-48203.htmlSource identifier: security@apache.org
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Linked advisories
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-48203"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-48203.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-48203 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>