Anonymous user token generation exposure in JFrog Artifactory (CVE-2026-42018)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive resources.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update JFrog Artifactory to version 7.111.20, JFrog Artifactory to version 7.117.27, JFrog Artifactory to version 7.125.19. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- JFrog Artifactory
lt *..7.111.20 - JFrog Artifactory
lt 7.117.0..7.117.27 - JFrog Artifactory
lt 7.125.0..7.125.19 - JFrog Artifactory
lt 7.133.0..7.133.28 - JFrog Artifactory
lt 7.146.0..7.146.8
- JFrog Artifactory
- Fixed in
- JFrog Artifactory
7.111.20 - JFrog Artifactory
7.117.27 - JFrog Artifactory
7.125.19 - JFrog Artifactory
7.133.28 - JFrog Artifactory
7.146.8
- JFrog Artifactory
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, BSI
9.8 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 95.5
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 233.57 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 9.8 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 95.5
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 1 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-287
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction, and it silently undoes a deliberate control: disabled anonymous access. Artefact repositories are high-value targets because they concentrate proprietary code, build outputs and embedded credentials that lead straight into CI/CD and cloud estates. Exploitation likelihood is high. No ransomware use is recorded, so the main risks are data theft and supply-chain compromise. Treat internet-exposed instances as critical with a 24-hour target and internal-only, segmented instances as high priority for the next maintenance window. NIS2/KRITIS entities should assess reporting obligations if exfiltration is confirmed.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Patch: Upgrade Artifactory to the fixed build of your release line: 7.111.20, 7.117.27, 7.125.19, 7.133.28 or 7.146.8. Confirm the running version via
GET /artifactory/api/system/versionor "Administration → Platform Monitoring". For JFrog Cloud (SaaS), get the patch status confirmed by JFrog support. - Cut exposure now: Until patched, restrict internet-facing Artifactory (HTTP/HTTPS, typically 443, 8081, 8082) to VPN, a bastion host or known CI/CD source IPs. A fronting reverse proxy (nginx, HAProxy) can drop any request that lacks an
Authorizationheader or a valid SSO cookie. - Strip the
anonymoususer's permissions: Removeanonymous, and any group it belongs to, from every permission target ("Administration → User Management → Permissions"). A leaked anonymous token then grants nothing, even though "Allow Anonymous Access" is already off. - Rotate secrets: Identify repositories (especially generic, Helm, Docker and Terraform) holding config files,
.npmrc,settings.xml, kubeconfigs or certificates that anonymous permissions could read. Rotate the exposed credentials, API keys and access tokens. - Preserve evidence: Snapshot request and access logs (
$JFROG_HOME/artifactory/var/log/,$JFROG_HOME/access/var/log/) back to at least the release date of the affected builds, before log rotation overwrites them.
- Patch: Upgrade Artifactory to the fixed build of your release line: 7.111.20, 7.117.27, 7.125.19, 7.133.28 or 7.146.8. Confirm the running version via
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Host Artifactory in a build or management zone. Allow inbound traffic only from CI runners, developer VLANs and proxy networks, and drop inbound internet traffic at the perimeter. Remote repositories need outbound connectivity only.
- Reverse proxy/WAF: Return 401 for requests without
Authorization/X-JFrog-Art-Api/session cookie on every path except/artifactory/api/system/pingand the login/SSO endpoints. Log any response that issues a token to a client that has not authenticated. - IAM/least privilege: Audit permission targets that use "Any Local", "Any Remote" or "ANY" repositories. Bind read and deploy rights to named groups only, issue admin tokens with short lifetimes, and enforce
expires_inon all tokens. - Configuration hardening: Under "Administration → Security → General", keep "Allow Anonymous Access" disabled and enable "Hide Existence of Unauthorized Resources". Enforce SAML/OIDC SSO with MFA for interactive logins.
- Supply-chain integrity: The flaw is confidentiality-only. If
anonymousever held deploy rights, verify critical artefacts anyway: compare checksums against CI build records and validate signatures (cosign, GPG).
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Artifactory request log: Search
artifactory-request.logfor useranonymouswith HTTP 200 on download or API paths. With anonymous access disabled, any such hit is suspicious. SPL:index=artifactory sourcetype=artifactory:request user="anonymous" status=200 | stats count by src_ip, request_path. - Access service logs: In
access-request.log/access-audit.log, look for token issuance or token use with subjectanonymous. Also flag hits on/access/api/v1/tokensfrom a source IP with no preceding successful login. - Bulk retrieval/enumeration: Flag a single external IP issuing many
GETs to/artifactory/api/repositories,/api/storage/,/api/search/or directory listings. Sigma shape:logsource: artifactory request,selection: path|contains: ['/api/repositories','/api/storage','/api/search'],condition: selection | count() by src_ip > 100within 10 min. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Watch for large egress from Artifactory to non-corporate IPs (
zeek conn.log: responder is Artifactory, smallorig_bytes, largeresp_bytes, external originator). Also flag new user agents such ascurl,python-requestsorGo-http-clientfrom unfamiliar networks. - Downstream credential abuse: Flag logins with credentials stored in artefacts to cloud consoles, Kubernetes APIs or registries from atypical locations (Entra ID sign-in logs, AWS CloudTrail
ConsoleLogin/AssumeRole).
- Artifactory request log: Search
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive resources.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| jfrog | artifactory |
|
|
| JFrog | Artifactory SaaS |
|
|
| JFrog | Artifactory Self-Managed |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-287Improper Authentication
Class
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
Entry at MITRE CWE-287
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- docs.jfrog.comJFrog Artifactory — CVE-2026-42016Vendor advisory, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- docs.jfrog.comreleases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releasesVendor advisory, Release notes
- wiz.ioblog/artifactory-under-attack-in-the-wild-exploitation-of-cve-2…Third-party advisory, Third-party advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-42018government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: JFrog Artifactory: JFrog Artifactory Incorrect Authorization Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-42016pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-42018pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment removed {"id":"CVE-2026-42018","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-11T00:00:00+00:00"}—SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-42018","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-01T18:06:12.895893Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2026-42018","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-13T15:05:05.752699Z"}{"id":"CVE-2026-42018","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-11T00:00:00+00:00"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference type added —CISA-ADP: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-42018 Types: US Government ResourceReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://www.wiz.io/blog/artifactory-under-attack-in-the-wild-exploitation-of-cve-2026-42016-cve-2026-4201 Types: Third Party AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedjfrog.com
Show 6 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releasesReference added —https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisoriesReference removed https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases—Reference removed https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories—Reference type removed https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases Types: Release Notes—Reference type removed https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories Types: Vendor Advisory—Source identifier: reefs@jfrog.com
Record modifiedCISA ADP
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-42018Reference added —https://www.wiz.io/blog/artifactory-under-attack-in-the-wild-exploitation-of-cve-2026-42016-cve-2026-4201Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Show 3 older changes
CISA KEV entry updated9119a7d8…
4 individual changes: Date Added, Due Date, Required Action, Vulnerability Name
Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Date Added added —2026-09-11Due Date added —2026-09-11Required Action added —2026-09-11Vulnerability Name added —2026-09-11Source identifier: 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725
Reanalysis by NVDNVD
Product mapping changed:- JFrog Artifactory (7.146.0 – before 7.146.8; before 7.111.20; 7.117.0 – before 7.117.27; 7.125.0 – before 7.125.19; 7.133.0 – before 7.133.28)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration changed OR *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.117.0 up to (excluding) 7.117.27 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.125.0 up to (excluding) 7.125.19 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.133.0 up to (excluding) 7.133.28 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.146.0 up to (excluding) 7.146.8 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 7.111.20OR *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:-:*:* versions from (including) 7.146.0 up to (excluding) 7.146.8 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:-:*:* versions up to (excluding) 7.111.20 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:-:*:* versions from (including) 7.117.0 up to (excluding) 7.117.27 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:-:*:* versions from (including) 7.125.0 up to (excluding) 7.125.19 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:-:*:* versions from (including) 7.133.0 up to (excluding) 7.133.28Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- JFrog Artifactory (7.117.0 – before 7.117.27; 7.125.0 – before 7.125.19; 7.133.0 – before 7.133.28; 7.146.0 – before 7.146.8; before 7.111.20)
Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.117.0 up to (excluding) 7.117.27 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.125.0 up to (excluding) 7.125.19 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.133.0 up to (excluding) 7.133.28 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 7.146.0 up to (excluding) 7.146.8 *cpe:2.3:a:jfrog:artifactory:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 7.111.20Reference type added —JFrog: https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/artifactory-self-managed-releases Types: Release NotesReference type added —JFrog: https://docs.jfrog.com/releases/docs/jfrog-security-advisories Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-42018"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-42018.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-42018 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>