CriticalCVE-2026-33825

    Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2026-33825)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, EUVD

    What is affected, what to do

    Insufficient granularity of access control in Microsoft Defender allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update Microsoft Defender Antimalware Platform to version 4.18.26030.3011. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Defender Antimalware Platform lt 4.0.0.0..4.18.26030.3011
    Fixed in
    • Microsoft Defender Antimalware Platform 4.18.26030.3011

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, EUVD

    6.8 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 93.9

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    250.88 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    6.8 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    93.9
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-1220

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw lets any authenticated low-privileged user take full control of the host with no user interaction, and the vulnerable component is the security product itself. CISA flags it for known ransomware use: operators chain it after initial access (phishing, stolen VPN or RDP credentials) to gain SYSTEM and neutralise AV before encryption. The statistical exploitation likelihood looks only moderate, but the KEV listing plus the ransomware flag outweigh that signal, and Defender runs on virtually every Windows asset, so exposure is estate-wide. Rate it high overall and treat multi-user servers and hosts with lagging platform updates as critical, targeting remediation within 72 hours.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory the platform version: Query the Defender Antimalware Platform on every Windows endpoint and server (Get-MpComputerStatus | Select AMProductVersion, AMServiceVersion) or pull it from DeviceTvmSoftwareInventory in Defender XDR. The context lists defender_antimalware_platform 4.18.26030.3011 as affected. Treat that build and anything older as vulnerable.
      • Force the platform update: A patch is available from the vendor. Look up the fixed platform version in the MSRC advisory. Push it via Windows Update, WSUS/ConfigMgr or Intune, trigger it manually where needed, then re-verify the version.
      • Clear update blockers: Find hosts stuck on old builds. Common causes are staged or gradual rollout channels, air-gapped segments, and WSUS without the Defender product category approved. On isolated KRITIS networks, apply the offline update package by hand.
      • Prioritise multi-user and pivot hosts: Patch terminal servers, Citrix/AVD hosts, jump boxes and developer workstations first. Many low-privileged accounts have local access there, which is exactly what this privilege escalation needs.
      • Verify Tamper Protection: Enforce it centrally and check it per host (IsTamperProtected). Investigate any host where it is off as potentially compromised.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • IAM / least privilege: Restrict "Allow log on locally" and "Allow log on through Remote Desktop Services" on servers to admin groups only. Rotate local admin passwords with Windows LAPS so a SYSTEM foothold on one host cannot be reused laterally.
      • Application control: Use WDAC or AppLocker to block execution from user-writable paths (%TEMP%, %APPDATA%, C:\Users\Public, and non-vendor folders under C:\ProgramData). This often stops a local exploit binary before it runs.
      • Endpoint hardening: Set ASR rules to block mode, in particular "Block credential stealing from LSASS", "Block process creations originating from PSExec and WMI commands" and "Use advanced protection against ransomware". These limit what an attacker can do after reaching SYSTEM.
      • Defender directory integrity: Baseline the ACLs on C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Defender\ and C:\Program Files\Windows Defender\ by comparing an icacls export against a reference host. Remediate any user- or group-writable entries immediately.
      • Network segmentation: The vector is local, so the priority is denying initial access. Block RDP (TCP 3389), SMB (TCP 445) and WinRM (TCP 5985/5986) between client VLANs, and route admin access only through PAWs or jump hosts.
      • Central policy: Set DisableLocalAdminMerge so locally added exclusions are ignored.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Abnormal children of Defender processes (Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 / MDE): DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("MsMpEng.exe","MpCmdRun.exe","NisSrv.exe","MpDefenderCoreService.exe") and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","rundll32.exe","regsvr32.exe"). A shell spawned under a Defender service is a strong sign of abuse.
      • Defender Operational log: Watch for EID 5001 (real-time protection disabled), 5007 (configuration change, especially new entries under Exclusions\Paths or Exclusions\Processes) and 5013 (Tamper Protection blocked a change). A Sigma rule should alert on EID 5007 where the new value contains Exclusions.
      • Writes to Defender paths (Sysmon EID 11/15, MDE DeviceFileEvents): Alert on file creation or modification under \Windows Defender\ by processes that are not SYSTEM or not Microsoft-signed. Also flag junction or reparse-point creation in C:\ProgramData, for example mklink on the command line followed by Sysmon EID 11.
      • Escalation chain: A process owned by a standard user spawns a child with IntegrityLevel=System, followed shortly by Security 4720 or 4732 (new user, or addition to local Administrators). SPL: index=sysmon EventCode=1 IntegrityLevel=System ParentUser!="NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM".
      • Ransomware precursors after reaching SYSTEM: vssadmin delete shadows, wbadmin delete catalog, bcdedit /set recoveryenabled no and Set-MpPreference -DisableRealtimeMonitoring $true (Sysmon EID 1, PowerShell EID 4104).

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Insufficient granularity of access control in Microsoft Defender allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

    Source: pwn.watch, cvelistv5, Microsoft Security Update Guide, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), ENISA EUVD, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    MicrosoftMicrosoft Defender Antimalware Platform
    • 4.0.0.0 – < 4.18.26030.3011
    • 4.18.26030.3011
    microsoftdefender_antimalware_platform
    • < 4.18.26030.3011
    • 4.18.26030.3011

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-1220Insufficient Granularity of Access Control

      Base

      The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-1220

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)defender-bluehammer-audit (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2026-33825 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerabilityeuvd, Vendor advisory, Patch, pwn-watch
    • huntress.comblog/nightmare-eclipse-intrusionThird-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-33825government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Defender: Microsoft Defender Insufficient Granularity of Access Control Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-33825pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    One NVD translation into another language is hidden.

    Linked advisories

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-33825
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-33825"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-33825.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-33825 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>