MediumCVE-2026-27145

Inefficient candidate hostname parsing in crypto/x509 (CVE-2026-27145)

Published 02.06.2026Last modified 18.09.2026Sources: Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, OSV

Public exploit

What is affected, what to do

An exploit is publicly available. Update Go standard library Crypto/x509 to version 1.25.11, Go standard library Crypto/x509 to version 1.26.4.

Affected: Go standard library Crypto/x509 lt *..1.25.11
Go standard library Crypto/x509 lt 1.26.0-0..1.26.4
Fixed in: Go standard library Crypto/x509 1.25.11
Go standard library Crypto/x509 1.26.4

Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

Metrics

6.5

Priority

XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

Source: NVD, CVSS v3

6.5

CVSS v3

Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

Source: Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide, OSV

0.6 %

EPSS score

Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.2

Show all metrics

Severity: Medium
Priority (0–325) The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first? Read in glossary: 69.35 Methodology
Exploit maturity An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack. Read in glossary: PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command. Read in glossary: 6.5 Methodology
CVSS v3 CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions. Read in glossary: 6.5
EPSS score The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“. Read in glossary: 0.6 %; Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking. Read in glossary: 48.2; High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching. Read in glossary: —
Published: 02.06.2026
CISA assessment (SSVC): Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial; Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 4 June 2026

Detection rules

No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

Classification under NIS2 and CRA

Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

NIS2 NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management. Read in glossary: Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates. Read in glossary: From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security. Read in glossary: Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

Description

A flaw was found in the `crypto/x509` package of `golang`. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by presenting a specially crafted X.509 certificate with a large number of DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. The certificate verification process, specifically the `VerifyHostname` function, incurs excessive computational overhead due to repeated string operations when processing these entries. This can lead to a significant performance degradation or unresponsiveness of systems validating such certificates.

Source: redhat_csaf, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), Microsoft Security Update Guide, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), cvelistv5

Affected products

The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

Affected products
		Affected versions	Fixed in
Go standard library	crypto/x509	`< 1.25.11` `1.26.0-0 – < 1.26.4`	`1.25.11` `1.26.4`
Golang	Go	`< 1.25.11` `< 1.26.4`	`1.25.11` `1.26.4`
go	stdlib	`1.26.0-0`	—

Vendors and products

Public exploit references

Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

Public exploit references

PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)	CVE-2026-27145 (opens in a new tab)github.com	PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified	03.06.2026

References & sources

go.devcl/783621web
go.devissue/79694web
groups.google.comg/golang-announce/c/tKs3rmcBcKwweb
NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-27145web
pkg.go.devvuln/GO-2026-5037web
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:33574web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:34357web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:34359web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comsecurity/cve/CVE-2026-27145web, Vulnerability database, x_refsource_REDHAT
bugzilla.redhat.comRHBZ#2484207web, Issue tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT
security.access.redhat.comdata/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-27145.jsonweb, x_sadp-csaf-vex
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:35832web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:36317web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:36648web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:29981web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:36797web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:38995web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:39005web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:39573web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
access.redhat.comerrata/RHSA-2026:23262web, Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT

Changes to this CVE

Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

18.09.2026Record modifiedRed Hat ADP

1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)

Show the original change

Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
Type	Action	Before	After
Affected versions (publisher)	added	—	Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/27xxx/CVE-2026-27145.json">CVE-2026-27145</a>