HighCVE-2026-26007

    cryptography Subgroup Attack Due to Missing Subgroup Validation for SECT Curves (CVE-2026-26007)

    Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org, OSV

    What is affected, what to do

    A validation flaw has been discovered in the python cryptography package. This missing validation allows an attacker to provide a public key point P from a small-order subgroup.

    Update Pyca Cryptography to version 46.0.5.

    Affected
    • Pyca Cryptography lt *..46.0.5
    Fixed in
    • Pyca Cryptography 46.0.5

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.2

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v4

    6.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org, OSV

    0.4 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 33.1

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    63.92 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.2 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    6.5
    CVSS v4

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.2
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.4 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    33.1
    Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 11 February 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-345

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A validation flaw has been discovered in the python cryptography package. This missing validation allows an attacker to provide a public key point P from a small-order subgroup. This can lead to security issues in various situations, such as the most commonly used signature verification (ECDSA) and shared key negotiation (ECDH). When the victim computes the shared secret as S = [victim_private_key]P via ECDH, this leaks information about victim_private_key mod (small_subgroup_order). For curves with cofactor > 1, this reveals the least significant bits of the private key. When these weak public keys are used in ECDSA , it's easy to forge signatures on the small subgroup. Only SECT curves are impacted by this.

    Source: redhat_csaf, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, cvelistv5, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    pycacryptography
    • < 46.0.5
    • 46.0.5
    cryptography.iocryptography
    • < 46.0.5
    • 46.0.5
    IBMConcert
    • < 3.0.0
    • 3.0.0
    OracleSiebel CRM
    • 17.0-26.5
    • —
    SplunkSOAR
    • < 8.6.0
    • 8.6.0
    pypicryptography
    • 38.0.4
    • 2.1.2
    • 0.6
    • 2.3
    • 41.0.2
    • 42.0.2
    • 45.0.7
    • 36.0.1
    • 42.0.7
    • 42.0.6
    • 2.0.2
    • 1.2
    • 2.4
    • 2.0.3
    • 42.0.3
    • 41.0.7
    • 0.2.2
    • 3.1
    • 2.7
    • 0.7
    • 38.0.0
    • 46.0.4
    • 46.0.3
    • 3.2
    • 2.2.2
    • 2.4.1
    • 2.1.1
    • 39.0.0
    • 46.0.1
    • 42.0.4
    • 42.0.1
    • 1.0
    • 2.5
    • 0.5.2
    • 0.8.2
    • 37.0.4
    • 45.0.2
    • 1.2.2
    • 2.8
    • 0.7.1
    • 0.2.1
    • 2.1.3
    • 0.8
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-345Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

      Class

      The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-345

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedGitHub

      Show 6 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/0eebb9dbb6343d9bc1d91e5a2482ed4e054a6d8c
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-r6ph-v2qm-q3c2
      Referenceremoved
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/0eebb9dbb6343d9bc1d91e5a2482ed4e054a6d8c
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-r6ph-v2qm-q3c2
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/0eebb9dbb6343d9bc1d91e5a2482ed4e054a6d8c Types: Patch
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-r6ph-v2qm-q3c2 Types: Vendor Advisory
      —

      Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com

    2. Record modifiedCVE Program

      Show 3 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/10/4
      Referenceremoved
      http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/10/4
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/02/10/4 Types: Mailing List, Third Party Advisory
      —

      Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108

    3. Record modifiedRed Hat ADP

      Show 47 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/26xxx/CVE-2026-26007.json">CVE-2026-26007</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10184
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12176
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13512
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13545
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13553
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13672
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19355
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21431
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21517
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22330
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22993
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2694
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5168
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5665
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6308
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6309
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6497
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6567
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6568
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7295
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26007
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2438762
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-26007.json
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10184
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12176
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13512
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13545
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13553
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13672
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19355
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21431
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21517
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22330
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22993
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2694
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5168
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5665
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6308
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6309
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6497
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6567
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6568
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7295
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26007
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2438762
      —
      Referenceremoved
      https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-26007.json
      —

      Source identifier: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c

    4. Record modifiedRed Hat ADP

      1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)changed
      Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+70)
      Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+70)

      Source identifier: 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-26007
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-26007"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-26007.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-26007 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>