CriticalCVE-2026-24423

    SmarterTools SmarterMail < Build 9511 Unauthenticated RCE via ConnectToHub API (CVE-2026-24423)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    What is affected, what to do

    The vulnerability CVE-2026-24423 allows for remote code execution (RCE) in SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to 100.0.9511 due to missing authentication in the ConnectToHub API method. An attacker can redirect the SmarterMail instance to a malicious HTTP server that executes harmful OS commands. This vulnerability is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since 2026. All versions before build 9511 are affected. It is imperative to update to version 100.0.9511 or higher to mitigate this vulnerability.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update SmarterTools SmarterMail to version 100.0.9511. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • SmarterTools SmarterMail lt *..100.0.9511
    Fixed in
    • SmarterTools SmarterMail 100.0.9511

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch

    88.2 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.77

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    267.47 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    CVSS v4

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.3
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    88.2 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.77
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-306

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable with no authentication or user interaction and gives full code execution on the mail server. That places it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited, and CISA records its use in ransomware campaigns. Typical targets are internet-facing SmarterMail deployments at mid-market firms, hosting providers and public-sector bodies. There the mail server becomes a beachhead for data theft, extortion and lateral movement into the internal network. Score any internet-exposed instance below build 9511 as critical: patch it immediately and check it for compromise first. Treat internal-only instances as high priority for the next emergency maintenance window.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Patch now: Upgrade SmarterMail to build 9511 or later. All builds prior to 9511 are vulnerable. Check the SmarterTools vendor advisory for the current build and install the latest available release, not just the minimum fixed one.
      • Cut exposure immediately: Until the patch is in place, block internet access to the web/API interface (HTTP/HTTPS or your custom web port) at the perimeter, or restrict it to VPN and admin source ranges. SMTP, IMAP and POP3 can stay open because the flaw is in the API.
      • Check for compromise before patching: Preserve and review the web/IIS logs of every SmarterMail instance for requests containing ConnectToHub. Treat any hit as a compromise: isolate the host, take a forensic image, then patch or rebuild.
      • Lock down server egress: Restrict outbound HTTP/HTTPS from the SmarterMail host to known destinations such as update, licensing and spam/AV feed servers. The exploit depends on the server reaching an attacker-controlled HTTP server.
      • Rotate credentials (if suspicious): Reset passwords for SmarterMail system and domain admins and the service account, plus any credentials stored on the box (AD/LDAP bind accounts, SMTP relay credentials).
      • Trigger reporting: If compromise is confirmed, start the NIS2 notification clock (early warning to the competent authority within 24 h). Because CISA flags known ransomware use, engage your IR team early.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Host SmarterMail in a DMZ with tight egress filtering. Allow no direct reach from the mail server to internal file servers, domain controllers (beyond the LDAP/Kerberos ports it needs) or backup infrastructure, to slow lateral movement and ransomware spread.
      • WAF/reverse proxy: Block requests whose URI or body contains ConnectToHub (case-insensitive) from untrusted networks. If you don't use hub/cluster functionality, drop the call entirely. Also put admin and API paths behind an IP allowlist.
      • IPS rule: Deploy a custom Suricata/Snort signature that matches HTTP requests to the SmarterMail host with content ConnectToHub (nocase) in http.uri or http.request_body, set to drop for external sources. Enable vendor IPS signatures for CVE-2026-24423 where they exist.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use an EDR policy, AppLocker or WDAC to block cmd.exe, powershell.exe, pwsh.exe, mshta.exe, rundll32.exe, certutil.exe and bitsadmin.exe from spawning under the SmarterMail service or w3wp.exe. At minimum, run Attack Surface Reduction rules in block mode.
      • Least privilege: Avoid running the SmarterMail service as LocalSystem where the vendor supports this. Use a dedicated service account with minimal filesystem and network rights to limit the blast radius of code execution.
      • Backup protection: Take offline or immutable copies of mail stores and configuration. Verify you can restore them before you patch or rebuild.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web/IIS access logs: Look for requests with ConnectToHub in the path, especially from external IPs, without a prior authenticated session or with an unusual user agent. SPL: index=web host=<smartermail> "ConnectToHub" | stats count by src_ip, uri, status
      • EDR/Sysmon EID 1 (process creation): Look for shell or LOLBin children of the SmarterMail service or w3wp.exe. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("MailService.exe","w3wp.exe") and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","certutil.exe","rundll32.exe","mshta.exe"). Verify the service binary name against your own installation first.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata, Sysmon EID 3): Look for outbound HTTP/HTTPS from the mail server to previously unseen or newly registered destinations immediately after an inbound ConnectToHub request. That inbound-then-outbound pairing is a strong exploitation signal.
      • Persistence and ransomware staging: Monitor Windows Event IDs 4698 (scheduled task), 7045 (new service) and 4720/4732 (new account or group change), plus Sysmon EID 11 for new .aspx/.exe/.dll files in web or SmarterMail directories. Also alert on vssadmin delete shadows or wbadmin on the mail host.
      • Sigma shape: logsource: product=windows, category=process_creation · selection: ParentImage|endswith: ['\MailService.exe','\w3wp.exe'] and Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe'] · level: high

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    SmarterTools SmarterMail versions prior to build 9511 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the ConnectToHub API method. The attacker could point the SmarterMail to the malicious HTTP server, which serves the malicious OS command. This command will be executed by the vulnerable application.

    Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), pwn.watch

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    SmarterToolsSmarterMail
    • < 100.0.9511
    • 100.0.9511
    smartertoolssmartermail
    • < 100.0.9511
    • 100.0.9511

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function

      Base

      The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-306

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)SmarterMail-CVE-2026-24423- (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • smartertools.comSmarterTools SmarterMail — CVE-2026-24423Release notes, Patch, pwn-watch
    • code-white.compublic-vulnerability-listThird-party advisory
    • vulncheck.comadvisories/smartertools-smartermail-unauthenticated-rce-via-con…Third-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-24423government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: SmarterTools SmarterMail: SmarterTools SmarterMail Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-24423pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-24423
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-24423"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-24423.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-24423 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>