CriticalCVE-2026-21513

MSHTML Framework Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2026-21513)

Published 10.02.2026In CISA KEV since 10.02.2026Sources: pwn.watch, EUVD, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide

What is affected, what to do

A protection mechanism failure in Microsoft's MSHTML Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. This vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild, including in ransomware campaigns since 2026. It affects all versions of the MSHTML Framework that implement this security feature. Due to its active exploitation, it is crucial to update to the latest version of the MSHTML Framework with high urgency to ensure security.

The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 to version 10.0.14393.8868, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 to version 10.0.17763.8389, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 to version 10.0.19044.6937. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

Affected: Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 lt 10.0.19044.0..10.0.19044.6937
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.6937
Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3 lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.6649
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2 lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.6649
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2 lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.7840
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2 lt 10.0.26200.0..10.0.26200.7840
Microsoft Windows 11 version 26H1 lt 10.0.28000.0..10.0.28000.1575
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25923
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25923
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.23022
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.23022
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows Server 2019 lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows Server 2022 lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.4773
Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.25398.0..10.0.25398.2149
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.32370
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.32370
Fixed in: Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.6937
Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.6937
Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3 10.0.22631.6649
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.6649
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.7840
Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.7840
Microsoft Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.1575
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.25923
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.25923
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23022
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23022
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.8868
Microsoft Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8389
Microsoft Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.4773
Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) 10.0.25398.2149
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32370
Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32370

Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

Metrics

8.8

Priority

XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

Source: NVD, CVSS v3

8.8

CVSS v3

Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

Source: pwn.watch, EUVD, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide

15.9 %

EPSS score

Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 96.9

Show all metrics

Severity: Critical
Priority (0–325) The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first? Read in glossary: 233.32 Methodology
Exploit maturity An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack. Read in glossary: actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command. Read in glossary: 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3 CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions. Read in glossary: 8.8
EPSS score The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“. Read in glossary: 15.9 %; Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking. Read in glossary: 96.9; Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching. Read in glossary: Actively exploited
Published: 10.02.2026
In CISA KEV since The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching. Read in glossary: 10.02.2026
CWE CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect. Read in glossary: CWE-693

Response and mitigation

Why act now?

Prioritisation rationale

This flaw defeats an MSHTML protection mechanism, typically Mark-of-the-Web, SmartScreen or security prompts. Attackers chain it into phishing campaigns where a crafted file or link runs follow-on code without the warnings users would normally see. It is network-reachable without authentication but needs a single user click, and its exploitation likelihood is very high. CISA does not currently flag ransomware use, but MSHTML bypasses are a common initial-access step for loaders and infostealers. Organisations with broad email exposure should patch all clients within 72 hours, starting with privileged and externally facing user groups.

01
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the February 2026 Patch Tuesday updates to all Windows clients. Target builds are at least 10.0.19045.6937 (Win10 22H2), 10.0.19044.6937 (21H2), 10.0.22631.6649 (Win11 22H3/23H2), 10.0.26100.7840 (24H2), 10.0.26200.7840 (25H2), 10.0.17763.8389 (1809) and 10.0.14393.8868 (1607). The context supplies no KB IDs – look them up in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2026-21513.
- Check servers that share these build lines (14393/17763 map to Server 2016/2019) and confirm applicability in the vendor advisory. Prioritise RDS/Citrix session hosts with interactive users.
- Inventory patch state via Intune, SCCM or Defender Vulnerability Management. For ad hoc checks, use Get-CimInstance Win32_OperatingSystem | Select Version,BuildNumber plus UBR from HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion. Patch heavy email and browser users first: executives, finance, HR and IT admins.
- Block or quarantine .url, .lnk, .hta, .mht/.mhtml and .html attachments at the mail gateway, including when nested in ZIP/ISO/IMG containers.
- Issue a targeted user advisory not to open unexpected shortcut or HTML files until rollout is complete, since exploitation requires user interaction.
02
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network: Block outbound SMB (TCP 445) and WebDAV from client VLANs to the internet at the perimeter. Disable the WebClient service via GPO where it is not needed, which cuts off UNC/WebDAV payload retrieval.
- Endpoint hardening: Enforce SmartScreen and Smart App Control, and set these Defender ASR rules to block mode:
  
  "Block all Office applications from creating child processes"
  
  "Block executable content from email client and webmail"
  
  "Block execution of potentially obfuscated scripts"
- Application control: Deny mshta.exe for standard users via WDAC or AppLocker. Restrict or alert on rundll32.exe invoking ieframe.dll, url.dll or mshtml.dll.
- Configuration: Ensure Mark-of-the-Web propagates through archive tools. Disable double-click auto-mount of ISO/IMG via GPO. Enforce Office Protected View and block internet-sourced macros.
- IAM: Remove local admin rights from standard users. Use dedicated privileged access workstations with no mail or browsing for admin accounts (tiering model).
03
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 / EDR process ancestry: Flag explorer.exe, outlook.exe or a browser spawning mshta.exe, rundll32.exe (with ieframe.dll,OpenURL or url.dll,FileProtocolHandler), cmd.exe or powershell.exe. Example KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("outlook.exe","explorer.exe") and FileName in~ ("mshta.exe","rundll32.exe") and ProcessCommandLine has_any ("ieframe","url.dll","mhtml:","javascript:").
- Sysmon EID 11/15: Watch for .url, .lnk or .mht files written to Downloads, %TEMP% or Outlook INetCache. Internet-sourced files missing a Zone.Identifier stream (EID 15) suggest a MOTW bypass.
- Network (Zeek/Suricata, firewall): Look for outbound SMB (445/tcp) or WebDAV PROPFIND requests from workstations to external IPs, and svchost.exe loading davclnt.dll with outbound connections (Sysmon EID 3).
- Defender telemetry: Monitor Microsoft-Windows-Windows Defender/Operational EID 1121 (ASR block) and 1122 (ASR audit), correlated with preceding mail deliveries.
- Sigma shape: logsource: process_creation | ParentImage|endswith: '\outlook.exe' OR '\explorer.exe' | Image|endswith: '\mshta.exe' | CommandLine|contains: 'http' → level high.

Detection rules

No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

Classification under NIS2 and CRA

Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

NIS2 NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management. Read in glossary: Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates. Read in glossary: Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security. Read in glossary: Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

Description

Protection mechanism failure in MSHTML Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

Source: pwn.watch, ENISA EUVD, NVD (NIST), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

Affected products

The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

Affected products
		Affected versions	Fixed in
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 1607	`10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.8868`	`10.0.14393.8868`
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 1809	`10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.8389`	`10.0.17763.8389`
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 21H2	`10.0.19044.0 – < 10.0.19044.6937`	`10.0.19044.6937`
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 22H2	`10.0.19045.0 – < 10.0.19045.6937`	`10.0.19045.6937`
Microsoft	Windows 11 version 22H3	`10.0.22631.0 – < 10.0.22631.6649`	`10.0.22631.6649`
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 23H2	`10.0.22631.0 – < 10.0.22631.6649`	`10.0.22631.6649`
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 24H2	`10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.7840`	`10.0.26100.7840`
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 25H2	`10.0.26200.0 – < 10.0.26200.7840`	`10.0.26200.7840`
Microsoft	Windows 11 version 26H1	`10.0.28000.0 – < 10.0.28000.1575`	`10.0.28000.1575`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2012	`6.2.9200.0 – < 6.2.9200.25923`	`6.2.9200.25923`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)	`6.2.9200.0 – < 6.2.9200.25923`	`6.2.9200.25923`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2012 R2	`6.3.9600.0 – < 6.3.9600.23022`	`6.3.9600.23022`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)	`6.3.9600.0 – < 6.3.9600.23022`	`6.3.9600.23022`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2016	`10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.8868`	`10.0.14393.8868`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)	`10.0.14393.0 – < 10.0.14393.8868`	`10.0.14393.8868`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2019	`10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.8389`	`10.0.17763.8389`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)	`10.0.17763.0 – < 10.0.17763.8389`	`10.0.17763.8389`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2022	`10.0.20348.0 – < 10.0.20348.4773`	`10.0.20348.4773`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)	`10.0.25398.0 – < 10.0.25398.2149`	`10.0.25398.2149`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2025	`10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.32370`	`10.0.26100.32370`
Microsoft	Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)	`10.0.26100.0 – < 10.0.26100.32370`	`10.0.26100.32370`

Vendors and products

Affected operating systems

Affected operating systems

Windows	microsoft	windows_10_1607	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_10_1809	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_10_21h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_10_22h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_11_23h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_11_24h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_11_25h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2012	`r2`
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2012	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2016	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2019	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2022	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2022_23h2	—
Windows	microsoft	windows_server_2025	—

Weakness classes (CWE)

CWE-693Protection Mechanism Failure
Pillar
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
Entry at MITRE CWE-693

Public exploit references

Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

Public exploit references

CISA KEV Catalog	CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov	actively exploited	10.02.2026

References & sources

Microsoft Security Update GuideMSHTML Framework Security Feature Bypass Vulnerabilityeuvd, Vendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory
cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-21513government-resource, US government resource
vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2026-21513-detection-script-security-feature…Third-party advisory
vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2026-21513-mitigation-script-security-featur…Mitigation, Third-party advisory
pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Windows: Microsoft MSHTML Framework Protection Mechanism Failure Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Windows — CVE-2026-21513pwn-watch
NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-21513pwn-watch
Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Windows — CVE-2026-21525pwn-watch
NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-21525pwn-watch
Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Windows — CVE-2026-21510pwn-watch
NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-21510pwn-watch

Embed badge

Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-21513"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-21513.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-21513 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>

What is affected, what to do

Metrics

Response and mitigation

Prioritisation rationale

Immediate response (0-24 h)

Mitigation layers

Detection rules

Detection rules

Classification under NIS2 and CRA

Description

Affected products

Vendors and products

Affected operating systems

Weakness classes (CWE)

Public exploit references

References & sources