Splunk Enterprise Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability (CVE-2026-20253)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
In Splunk Enterprise 10.2 versions below 10.2.4 and 10 versions below 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint. The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Splunk Enterprise to version 10.2.4, Splunk Enterprise to version 10.0.7. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Splunk Enterprise
lt 10.2..10.2.4 - Splunk Enterprise
lt 10.0..10.0.7
- Splunk Enterprise
- Fixed in
- Splunk Enterprise
10.2.4 - Splunk Enterprise
10.0.7
- Splunk Enterprise
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org, BSI
96.9 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.89
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 247.62 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 96.9 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.89
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-306
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and sits among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Exploitation is trivial because the endpoint simply has no access control. CISA does not flag ransomware use, but the real risk is that Splunk is frequently the organisation's central SIEM: an attacker able to create or truncate files can sabotage detection and evidence, disrupt operations and potentially stage further persistence. NIS2/KRITIS organisations running Splunk 10.0 or 10.2 should treat this as an emergency change within 24 hours, and as a likely security incident if the sidecar endpoint was reachable from user or external networks; estates on 9.4 or earlier need no action for this CVE.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Scope the estate: Enumerate every Splunk Enterprise instance (search heads, indexers, heavy forwarders, deployment server, cluster manager) and check its version (
$SPLUNK_HOME/bin/splunk version). Only the 10.2.x below 10.2.4 and 10.0.x below 10.0.7 branches are affected. The vendor states 9.4 and earlier are not affected. - Patch: Upgrade affected instances to 10.2.4 or 10.0.7. Prioritise nodes whose network interfaces are reachable from user VLANs, the DMZ or the internet.
- If you cannot upgrade today: Disable the PostgreSQL sidecar service. This is the vendor-documented workaround; follow the Splunk advisory for the exact procedure. Restart Splunk, then confirm the sidecar process is gone and its listeners are closed (
ss -tlnp, orGet-NetTCPConnection -State Listenon Windows). - Cut exposure now: Restrict the sidecar's listening ports to
localhostor Splunk cluster peers via host firewall or perimeter ACL. Identify the actual port on the host rather than assuming one. - Check integrity: Hunt for unexpected new files or files truncated to 0 bytes. Focus on
$SPLUNK_HOME/etc/(configs,passwd, apps), index directories and OS files. Splunk is often the SIEM itself, so an attacker can wipe the evidence and blind detection. - If compromise is suspected: Isolate the host and take a forensic image. Before restoring from a known-good backup, rotate Splunk admin credentials, HEC tokens and service-account passwords.
- Scope the estate: Enumerate every Splunk Enterprise instance (search heads, indexers, heavy forwarders, deployment server, cluster manager) and check its version (
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Place Splunk management interfaces and sidecar endpoints in a dedicated management VLAN. Allow access only from designated admin jump hosts and between cluster nodes, with default deny. Allow no direct internet reachability.
- Host firewall: On every Splunk node, drop inbound traffic to the sidecar listener from anything other than
127.0.0.1, using iptables/nftables or a per-port Windows Firewall rule. This provides a protective layer even if patching slips. - IPS/NDR: Write a Suricata or Zeek rule that alerts on any TCP session to the sidecar port from a source outside the Splunk node list. In a properly segmented environment, every hit is an alert. Deploy vendor IPS signatures as they ship.
- Filesystem hardening: Keep write permissions for the Splunk service account to the minimum required, and never run Splunk as
root/SYSTEM. This limits how far arbitrary file operations can reach into system paths. - Resilience: Keep immutable backups of
$SPLUNK_HOME/etcand critical indexes. Dual-forward security-relevant logs to a second destination so truncation on an indexer does not mean total loss.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Linux auditd:
-w /opt/splunk/etc -p wa -k splunk_cfg, plus monitoring ofO_TRUNC/creatsyscalls whereexematches the PostgreSQL sidecar binary. Alert on any write outside its own data directory. - Sysmon (Windows): EID 11 (FileCreate) where
Imageis the PostgreSQL process under$SPLUNK_HOMEandTargetFilenameis outside the Postgres data path. Use EID 3 to catch inbound network connections to that process from non-local IPs. - Network telemetry (Zeek):
conn.logwhereid.resp_p == <sidecar port> and id.orig_h not in splunk_nodes→ alert. Escalate port scans targeting Splunk hosts. - Splunk self-monitoring: Search
index=_internalfor config- or index-file load errors and sudden ingestion gaps, e.g.| tstats count where index=* by _time span=5m, indexwith anomaly detection on abrupt drops. Truncated files typically surface as parse or startup errors. - File integrity (FIM/EDR): Alert on 0-byte files under
$SPLUNK_HOME/etcor/etc. Also alert on new files in app directories (etc/apps/*/bin,default/,local/) that do not map to a change ticket.
- Linux auditd:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In Splunk Enterprise 10.2 versions below 10.2.4 and 10 versions below 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint. The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials. Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4 and earlier are not affected. If you cannot immediately upgrade to a fixed version, you can mitigate this vulnerability by disabling the PostgreSQL sidecar service.
Source: CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk | Splunk Enterprise |
|
|
| splunk | splunk |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Base
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
Entry at MITRE CWE-306
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Reference tagged as exploit | labs.watchtowr.com (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-20253-Splunk-Enterprise-Pre-Auth-RCE- (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-20253 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-20253 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-20253 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- advisory.splunk.comadvisories/SVD-2026-0603
- labs.watchtowr.comwhy-use-app-level-auth-when-every-database-has-auth-splunk-ente…Exploit
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20253government-resource
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference type changed Cisco Systems, Inc.: https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0603 Types: Vendor AdvisoryCisco Systems, Inc.: https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0603 Types: Mitigation, Vendor AdvisoryReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://labs.watchtowr.com/why-use-app-level-auth-when-every-database-has-auth-splunk-enterprise-cve-2026-20253-pre-auth-rce/ Types: Exploit, Third Party AdvisoryReference type added —CISA-ADP: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20253 Types: US Government ResourceSource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedCISA ADP
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://labs.watchtowr.com/why-use-app-level-auth-when-every-database-has-auth-splunk-enterprise-cve-2026-20253-pre-auth-rce/Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCisco
Description added or changed
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description changed In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint.<br><br>The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials.In Splunk Enterprise 10.2 versions below 10.2.4 and 10 versions below 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint. The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials. Splunk Enterprise versions 9.4 and earlier are not affected. If you cannot immediately upgrade to a fixed version, you can mitigate this vulnerability by disabling the PostgreSQL sidecar service.Source identifier: psirt@cisco.com
Record modifiedCisco
Description added or changed
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description changed In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2604.3 and 10.2.2510.14, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint.<br><br>The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials.In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint.<br><br>The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials.Source identifier: psirt@cisco.com
Initial analysis by NVDNVD
Newly listed as affected:- Splunk Enterprise (10.0.0 – before 10.0.7; 10.2.0 – before 10.2.4)
New references:Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration added —OR *cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:* versions from (including) 10.0.0 up to (excluding) 10.0.7 *cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk:*:*:*:*:enterprise:*:*:* versions from (including) 10.2.0 up to (excluding) 10.2.4Reference type added —Cisco Systems, Inc.: https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0603 Types: Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Show one older change
ReceivedCisco
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-306
Description added or changed
New references:Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2604.3 and 10.2.2510.14, an unauthenticated user could create or truncate arbitrary files through a PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint.<br><br>The vulnerability exists because the PostgreSQL sidecar service endpoint lacks authentication controls, allowing any network-reachable user to invoke file operations without credentials.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-306Reference added —https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0603Source identifier: psirt@cisco.com
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Linked advisories
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-20253"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-20253.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-20253 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>