HighCVE-2026-12541

    Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake database tasks (CVE-2026-12541)

    Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, CVE.org, BSI

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks.

    Update Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 to version 0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat, Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9 to version 0:3.12.0.23-1.el9sat, Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9 to version 0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat.

    Affected
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 lt *..0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9 lt *..0:3.12.0.23-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9 lt *..0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9 lt *..0:3.16.0.25-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 lt *..0:3.18.0.14-1.el9sat
    Fixed in
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8 0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9 0:3.12.0.23-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9 0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9 0:3.16.0.25-1.el9sat
    • Red Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9 0:3.18.0.14-1.el9sat

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.2

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    8.2

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: Red Hat, CVE.org, BSI

    1.2 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 69.1

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    108.51 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.2 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.2
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    1.2 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    69.1
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 1 October 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-78

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths.

    Source: redhat_csaf, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI CSAF, BSI WID Portal

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
    • < 0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat
    • 0:3.12.0.23-1.el8sat
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 9
    • < 0:3.12.0.23-1.el9sat
    • 0:3.12.0.23-1.el9sat
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.17 for RHEL 9
    • < 0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat
    • 0:3.14.0.22-1.el9sat
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9
    • < 0:3.16.0.25-1.el9sat
    • 0:3.16.0.25-1.el9sat
    Red HatRed Hat Satellite 6.19 for RHEL 9
    • < 0:3.18.0.14-1.el9sat
    • 0:3.18.0.14-1.el9sat
    redhatsatellite
    • 6.18 – < 6.18.10
    • 6.19 – < 6.19.5
    • 6.17 – < 6.17.12
    • 6.16 – < 6.16.4
    • 6.0
    • 6.18.10
    • 6.19.5
    • 6.17.12
    • 6.16.4
    • —
    theforemanforeman
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-78Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

      Base

      The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-78

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Initial analysis by NVDNVD

      Newly listed as affected:
      Show 14 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Product configurationadded
      —
      OR *cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Product configurationadded
      —
      AND OR *cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 6.16 up to (excluding) 6.16.4 OR cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Product configurationadded
      —
      AND OR *cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 6.17 up to (excluding) 6.17.12 OR cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Product configurationadded
      —
      AND OR *cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 6.19 up to (excluding) 6.19.5 OR cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Product configurationadded
      —
      OR *cpe:2.3:a:theforeman:foreman:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Product configurationadded
      —
      AND OR *cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 6.18 up to (excluding) 6.18.10 OR cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74503 Types: Vendor Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74504 Types: Vendor Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74505 Types: Vendor Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74506 Types: Vendor Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12541 Types: Vendor Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      CVE: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/07/8 Types: Third Party Advisory
      Reference typeadded
      —
      Red Hat, Inc.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489970 Types: Issue Tracking, Mitigation, Vendor Advisory
      Reference typechanged
      nvd-ai-agent-0.4.0-gemma-4-31B-it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489970 Types: Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
      nvd-ai-agent-0.4.0-gemma-4-31B-it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489970 Types: Issue Tracking, Issue Tracking, Mitigation, Vendor Advisory, Vendor Advisory

      Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov

    2. Record modifiedCVE Program

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/07/8

      Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108

    3. Record modifiedRed Hat

      Show 2 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/12xxx/CVE-2026-12541.json">CVE-2026-12541</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74505

      Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com

    4. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no

      Show 2 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentremoved
      {"id":"CVE-2026-12541","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-01T16:34:28.362927Z"}
      —
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2026-12541","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-01T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    5. Record modifiedRed Hat

      Show 3 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/12xxx/CVE-2026-12541.json">CVE-2026-12541</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74504
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74506

      Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com

    Show 2 older changes
    1. ReceivedRed Hat

      CVSS V3.1: AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

      Weakness type: CWE-78

      Description added or changed

      Show 7 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Descriptionadded
      —
      A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths.
      CVSSadded
      —
      AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-78
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/12xxx/CVE-2026-12541.json">CVE-2026-12541</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:74503
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-12541
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2489970

      Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2026-12541","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-01T16:34:28.362927Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-12541
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-12541"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-12541.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-12541 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>