Seroval: fromJSON deserializer trusts sequence doneAt (unauthenticated event-loop DoS) (CVE-2026-116581)
Published Last modified Sources: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Update Lxsmnsyc Seroval to version 1.6.8.
- Affected
- Lxsmnsyc Seroval
lt *..1.6.8
- Lxsmnsyc Seroval
- Fixed in
- Lxsmnsyc Seroval
1.6.8
- Lxsmnsyc Seroval
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 39.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 79.71 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 39.1
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-1284, CWE-835
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
fromJSON and fromCrossJSON used two node fields without checking them.
- An array node's element list was not checked to be an array. A small payload could set the length the decoder looped over. This part is also tracked in GHSA-wp97-x4hv-qvhp.
- A sequence node's done index was not checked. A crafted value produced an iterator that never finished.
Impact
A service that passes untrusted input to fromJSON or fromCrossJSON can be made unavailable by an unauthenticated request.
- The array case blocks the thread while the decoder runs.
- The sequence case makes any code that reads the resulting iterator to the end run forever.
Patches
Fixed in seroval@1.6.8.
- Element lists must be arrays.
- A sequence node's throw and done indices must be integers from -1 up to the last element index.
Invalid input throws SerovalMalformedNodeError.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to 1.6.8.
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| lxsmnsyc | seroval |
|
|
| npm | seroval |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-1284Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Base
The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.
Entry at MITRE CWE-1284CWE-835Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
Base
The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.
Entry at MITRE CWE-835
References & sources
- github.comlxsmnsyc/seroval/commit/e176f9267e59ddd6c9de89cc9fe85c5b37a5b728x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comlxsmnsyc/seroval/releases/tag/seroval@1.6.8x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comlxsmnsyc/seroval/security/advisories/GHSA-97r2-qh9m-474hx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-116581advisory
- github.comlxsmnsyc/seroval/commit/cdcee3e3bc384ee844360844f8ea98fd2b275d69web
- github.comlxsmnsyc/serovalpackage
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-835, CWE-1284
Description added or changed
Show 8 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —Seroval facilitates JavaScript value stringification, including complex structures beyond JSON.stringify capabilities. Prior to 1.6.8, fromJSON and fromCrossJSON do not validate a sequence node's done index. A crafted done index can create an iterator that never finishes when application code consumes it to completion. An unauthenticated request to a service that deserializes untrusted input can therefore block the event loop, exhaust process memory, or make the service unavailable. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.8.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-835Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-1284Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/116xxx/CVE-2026-116581.json">CVE-2026-116581</a>Reference added —https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval/commit/e176f9267e59ddd6c9de89cc9fe85c5b37a5b728Reference added —https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval/releases/tag/seroval@1.6.8Reference added —https://github.com/lxsmnsyc/seroval/security/advisories/GHSA-97r2-qh9m-474hSource identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-116581"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-116581.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-116581 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>