ApostropheCMS sanitize-html: Uncontrolled Recursion (CVE-2026-113650)
Published Last modified Sources: Hersteller, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Update Apostrophe to version 4.34.0.
- Affected
- Apostrophe
lt *..4.34.0 - ApostropheCMS sanitize-html
gte 2.18.0, < 2.18.1..*
- Apostrophe
- Fixed in
- Apostrophe
4.34.0
- Apostrophe
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.3
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
5.3
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Hersteller, CVE.org
0.3 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 21.6
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 56.50 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.3 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.3
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.3 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 21.6
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-674
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
Since 2.18.0, when an <iframe> is not allowed and disallowedTagsMode is 'discard' (the defaults),
its raw-text content is re-sanitized by a recursive call to sanitizeHtml(text, options) (the change
from #5564, fixing #5550). The recursion has no bound and starts each nested call with a fresh state.
Two consequences, both absent from 2.17.7 and 2.17.4:
- A few kilobytes of unclosed
<iframe>tags throwRangeError: Maximum call stack size exceededwith the default options. Any application that sanitizes untrusted HTML with 2.18.0 can be made to throw on a small crafted input. nestingLimitis not enforced across a discarded iframe: each nested iframe restarts the depth count at zero, so the output can be nested arbitrarily deep regardless of the configured limit.
Affected versions
- 2.18.0 (the current
latest), and themainbranch at the time of writing (the recursive call is still inpackages/sanitize-html/index.js, in theontexthandler, branchtag === 'iframe' && !tagAllowed(tag) && options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard'). - Not affected: 2.17.7 and 2.17.4 (tested with the same inputs below).
Tested with Node.js v26.7.0.
Reproduction 1: stack overflow with the default options
const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');
// with 2.18.0:
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(1000)); // 8,000 chars: returns ''
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(2000)); // 16,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(20000)); // 160,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
Results:
| input | 2.17.4 | 2.17.7 | 2.18.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
'<iframe>'.repeat(1000) | ok | ok | ok |
'<iframe>'.repeat(2000) | ok | ok | RangeError |
'<iframe>'.repeat(20000) | ok | ok | RangeError |
The threshold depends on the remaining stack, so it is lower when sanitizeHtml is called from an
already deep call stack (for example inside a server-side rendering pass).
Reproduction 2: nestingLimit is bypassed
const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');
const input = ('<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3)).repeat(50) + 'x';
const out = sanitizeHtml(input, { allowedTags: ['b'], nestingLimit: 3 });
// maximum nesting depth of <b> in `out`:
// 2.17.4: 2 2.17.7: 0 (fallback escaped as text) 2.18.0: 150
Without an iframe, the same options cap the output at three nested <b> in all three versions. With
k repetitions of '<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3), 2.18.0 returns 3 * k nested <b> (measured for
k = 1, 5, 50: depth 3, 15, 150).
Cause
In 2.18.0 the ontext handler does:
} else if (
tag === 'iframe' &&
!tagAllowed(tag) &&
options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard'
) {
result += sanitizeHtml(text, options);
}
Because htmlparser2 treats <iframe> as a raw-text element, the text of an unclosed iframe is the whole
remainder of the input; re-parsing it can meet another unclosed <iframe>, and so on, one stack frame
(and one full re-parse) per iframe. The nested call also starts with its own depth, so tags inside the
fallback are not counted against nestingLimit together with the enclosing tags.
Possible directions
Not a patch, only what would close both effects: bound the recursion (or process the fallback without
recursing), and carry the current depth into the nested sanitization so that nestingLimit applies to
the whole output.
Source: GitHub Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| apostrophecms | apostrophe |
|
|
| apostrophecms | sanitize-html |
|
|
| npm | sanitize-html |
|
|
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-674Uncontrolled Recursion
Class
The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.
Entry at MITRE CWE-674
References & sources
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/06e4b377f3c360f9e89c32dccd7e505…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/40b989b1a9dd23d30029b8ce7668634…x_refsource_MISC
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/releases/tag/sanitize-html@2.18.1x_refsource_MISC
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-c9rx-x947-fp3hx_refsource_CONFIRM
Reanalysis & status changes
Chronological NVD audit events for this CVE — reanalyses, CVSS updates, CPE diffs.
New CVE Receivedsecurity-advisories@github.com
- Description: after ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. In sanitize-html 2.18.0, when an <iframe> is not allowed and disallowedTagsMode is 'discard' (the defaults), its raw-text content is re-sanitized by a recursive call to sanitizeHtml(text, options). The recursion has no bound and starts each nested call with a fresh state. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.18.1.
- CVSS V3.1: after AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- CWE: after CWE-674
- Affected: after New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/113xxx/CVE-2026-113650.json">CVE-2026-113650</a>
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-113650"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-113650.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-113650 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>