kin-openapi: YAML NaN/Inf Values Bypass Built-in Guards and Panic via OAS 3.1 Validation Path (CVE-2026-100352)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, CVE.org, OSV, Hersteller
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in kin-openapi. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting a specially crafted YAML request containing non-finite numeric values, such as Not-a-Number or infinity, to an endpoint with numeric constraints.
Update Getkin Kin-openapi to version 0.148.0.
- Affected
- Getkin Kin-openapi
lt *..0.148.0
- Getkin Kin-openapi
- Fixed in
- Getkin Kin-openapi
0.148.0
- Getkin Kin-openapi
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, CVE.org, OSV, Hersteller
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.4
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 86.25 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.4
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 20 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-754
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in kin-openapi. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting a specially crafted YAML request containing non-finite numeric values, such as Not-a-Number or infinity, to an endpoint with numeric constraints. Because the validation process fails to restrict these unexpected values, the application triggers a runtime crash. This allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) on the affected service.
Source: redhat_csaf, NVD (NIST), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| getkin | kin-openapi |
|
|
| go | github.com/getkin/kin-openapi |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-754Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions
Class
The product does not check or incorrectly checks for unusual or exceptional conditions that are not expected to occur frequently during day to day operation of the product.
Entry at MITRE CWE-754
References & sources
- github.comgetkin/kin-openapi/security/advisories/GHSA-rj39-cv6w-8wv7web, x_refsource_CONFIRM
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100352advisory
- github.comgetkin/kin-openapi/commit/4487f198ab8be0c37d6ca72c54f5dca4dc252…web, x_refsource_MISC
- github.comgetkin/kin-openapipackage
- github.comgetkin/kin-openapi/releases/tag/v0.148.0web, x_refsource_MISC
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: proof of concept, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/security/advisories/GHSA-rj39-cv6w-8wv7SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-100352","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-20T02:45:51.857992Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-754
Description added or changed
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —kin-openapi is a Go project for handling OpenAPI files. Prior to 0.148.0, the OpenAPI 3.1 validation path passes YAML NaN and infinity numeric values to santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema v6.0.2 without applying kin-openapi's existing finite-number guards. A remote unauthenticated client can send an application/yaml or application/x-yaml request body containing .nan, .inf, or -.inf to an operation with a numeric constraint, causing the dependency to create and dereference a nil big.Rat during ValidateRequest. Standard net/http servers recover the panic per connection, while other hosts or application goroutines may terminate the process. This issue is fixed in version 0.148.0.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-754Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/100xxx/CVE-2026-100352.json">CVE-2026-100352</a>Reference added —https://github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/commit/4487f198ab8be0c37d6ca72c54f5dca4dc25270eReference added —https://github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/releases/tag/v0.148.0Reference added —https://github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/security/advisories/GHSA-rj39-cv6w-8wv7Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-100352"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-100352.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-100352 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>