Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59230)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
What is affected, what to do
Improper access control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 to version 10.0.10240.21161, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 to version 10.0.14393.8519, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 to version 10.0.17763.7919. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
lt 10.0.10240.0..10.0.10240.21161 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
lt 10.0.19044.0..10.0.19044.6456 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.6456 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
lt 10.0.22621.0..10.0.22621.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3
lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2
lt 10.0.26200.0..10.0.26200.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.4294 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.25398.0..10.0.25398.1913 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
10.0.10240.21161 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
10.0.19044.6456 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
10.0.19045.6456 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
10.0.22621.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3
10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2
10.0.26200.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
10.0.20348.4294 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
10.0.25398.1913 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025
10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)
10.0.26100.6899
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, Msrc Update Guide
2.7 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 85.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 209.13 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 2.7 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 85.7
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 15 October 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-284
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw requires prior local code execution with low privileges. Once that foothold exists, it is low-complexity, needs no user interaction and yields full host compromise. That makes it the textbook second stage after phishing, infostealers or abused VPN/RDP accounts, and its KEV listing on patch day points to targeted use before the fix shipped. Exploitation likelihood is clearly above average but not in the top tier, and CISA reports no known ransomware use. Treat it as high priority on an accelerated cycle (within days), and as critical for multi-user and admin systems or organisations with heavy phishing pressure. Internet-exposure-only scoring will underrate it.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy Microsoft's October 2025 security update. Target builds (Build.UBR): Windows 10 1507 → 10.0.10240.21161, 1607 → 10.0.14393.8519, 1809 → 10.0.17763.7919, 21H2 → 10.0.19044.6456, 22H2 → 10.0.19045.6456; Windows 11 22H2 → 10.0.22621.6060, 23H2 → 10.0.22631.6060. Look up the per-build KB number in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2025-59230. Windows Server builds are not listed in this context, so verify server exposure in the vendor advisory.
- Inventory patch state. Pull the build via Intune, SCCM, Defender TVM or a script:
$k=Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion'; "$($k.CurrentBuild).$($k.UBR)". Flag every host below the target build as open. - Patch multi-user and admin endpoints first. This covers RDS/Citrix hosts, VDI, jump hosts, PAWs, and admin and helpdesk workstations. On these systems a local privilege escalation leads straight to privileged credentials.
- Treat hosts with recent initial-access alerts as suspect. Any host that has raised phishing payload, infostealer or loader alerts in recent weeks should be considered potentially SYSTEM-compromised. Isolate it via EDR and reset cached credentials for accounts that logged on there.
- Identify unsupported Windows 10 builds. Windows 10 22H2 without an ESU contract receives no further fixes after October 2025. Escalate these hosts for migration or ESU procurement.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Configuration change: Where neither the built-in Windows VPN client, Always On VPN nor dial-up is needed (servers, kiosks, OT HMIs), disable the RasMan service:
sc.exe config RasMan start= disabledandStop-Service RasMan -Force. Check dependencies first, because the RemoteAccess service requires RasMan and some third-party VPN clients may break. - Endpoint hardening: Set ASR rules to block mode, notably "Block credential stealing from LSASS" and "Block executable files unless they meet prevalence, age or trusted list criteria". Also enable LSA protection (RunAsPPL) and Credential Guard. This limits what an attacker can do with SYSTEM rights.
- Application control: Apply WDAC or AppLocker rules to user-writable paths (
%TEMP%,%APPDATA%,Downloads,C:\Users\Public). Exploit binaries are typically launched from these paths. - IAM/least privilege: Remove local admin rights and enforce Windows LAPS for unique local admin passwords. Keep privileged domain accounts off standard clients (tiering model, "Deny log on locally" for Tier 0 on Tier 2).
- Network segmentation: Restrict lateral movement after escalation. Block client-to-client SMB (445), RPC (135) and WinRM (5985/5986) via a Windows Firewall GPO, and allow these protocols only from dedicated admin subnets.
- Configuration change: Where neither the built-in Windows VPN client, Always On VPN nor dial-up is needed (servers, kiosks, OT HMIs), disable the RasMan service:
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 – unusual children of the RasMan service host:
svchost.exewith-s RasManin its command line spawningcmd.exe,powershell.exe,rundll32.exeor unsigned binaries. KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "svchost.exe" and InitiatingProcessCommandLine has "RasMan" | where FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","rundll32.exe","regsvr32.exe") - Integrity jump in process ancestry: A System-integrity process whose tree traces back to a medium-integrity user session (EDR ancestry), especially when its image path is under
\Users\. Sigma shape:IntegrityLevel: System+Image|contains: '\Users\'+User|endswith: 'SYSTEM'. - Sysmon EID 12/13 – registry tampering: Writes to
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\RasMan\*orHKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\RasMan\*by any process other thansvchost.exe,services.exeorTrustedInstaller.exe. - Post-escalation activity: LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10,
TargetImagelsass.exe, GrantedAccess0x1010/0x1410), new service installs (System 7045, Security 4697) and local Administrators group changes (4732), each shortly after execution from a user path. - System 7036/7040: Unexpected start/stop cycles or start-type changes of RasMan on hosts that do not use VPN.
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 – unusual children of the RasMan service host:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Improper access control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE), Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1507 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H3 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 23H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 25H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 21H2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 22h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22h2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 22H2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 23H2
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1507 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_21h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_23h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_24h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_25h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022_23h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2025 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-284Improper Access Control
Pillar
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Entry at MITRE CWE-284
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideWindows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-59230government-resource, US government resource
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-59230-detection-script-elevation-of-pri…Third-party advisory
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-59230-mitigation-script-elevation-of-pr…Mitigation, Third-party advisory
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Windows: 2 exploited vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-24990, CVE-2025-59230)pwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-24990pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-59230pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-59230"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-59230.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-59230 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>