MediumCVE-2025-55002

    JupyterLab Desktop: TCC Bypass via Misconfigured Node Fuses (CVE-2025-55002)

    Published Last modified Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    JupyterLab Desktop is the cross-platform desktop application for JupyterLab. Prior to 4.6.2-1, JupyterLab Desktop for macOS shipped with Electron's RunAsNode fuse enabled, allowing ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE to execute arbitrary Node.js code in the application process.

    Update Jupyterlab-desktop to version 4.6.2-1.

    Affected
    • Jupyterlab-desktop lt *..4.6.2-1
    Fixed in
    • Jupyterlab-desktop 4.6.2-1

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    5.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    5.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    0.2 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 10.8

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Medium
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    58.42 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    5.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    5.5
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.2 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    10.8
    Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-94, CWE-250, CWE-693

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    JupyterLab Desktop is the cross-platform desktop application for JupyterLab. Prior to 4.6.2-1, JupyterLab Desktop for macOS shipped with Electron's RunAsNode fuse enabled, allowing ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE to execute arbitrary Node.js code in the application process. An attacker who can already execute code as the current user can therefore run code in JupyterLab Desktop's context and inherit TCC permissions previously granted to the application, including access to protected Documents, Desktop, or Downloads folders without another macOS prompt. Exploitation requires existing local code execution and prior TCC grants; it does not provide initial or remote code execution. Windows and Linux are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.6.2-1.

    Source: pwn.watch, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    jupyterlabjupyterlab-desktop
    • < 4.6.2-1
    • 4.6.2-1

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

      Base

      The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-94

    • CWE-250Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

      Base

      The product performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-250

    • CWE-693Protection Mechanism Failure

      Pillar

      The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-693

    References & sources

    • github.comjupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/commit/5ea4bf3323b0b7acc943a86752…x_refsource_MISC
    • github.comJupyterLab Desktop v4.6.2-1 releasepwn-watch, x_refsource_MISC
    • github.comGHSA-5c3f-5gj7-p9xh / CVE-2025-55002: macOS TCC bypass via Node fusespwn-watch, x_refsource_CONFIRM
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: JupyterLab Desktop: XSS and one-click token-leak RCE (CVE-2026-102530 / CVE-2026-86044) plus macOS TCC bypasses — fixed in 4.6.2-1pwn-watch
    • github.comGHSA-vrj4-r4fw-9rfh: Connect URL XSS leading to RCEpwn-watch
    • github.comGHSA-2mr8-962v-wc67: one-click server token leak leading to RCEpwn-watch
    • github.comGHSA-8cvf-4977-r95v / CVE-2025-54991: macOS TCC bypass via entitlementspwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-102530pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-86044pwn-watch
    • discourse.jupyter.orgJupyterLab Desktop 4.6.2-1 is out: critical security patchespwn-watch

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. ReceivedGitHub

      CVSS V3.1: AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

      Weakness type: CWE-94, CWE-693, CWE-250

      Description added or changed

      Show 9 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Descriptionadded
      —
      JupyterLab Desktop is the cross-platform desktop application for JupyterLab. Prior to 4.6.2-1, JupyterLab Desktop for macOS shipped with Electron's RunAsNode fuse enabled, allowing ELECTRON_RUN_AS_NODE to execute arbitrary Node.js code in the application process. An attacker who can already execute code as the current user can therefore run code in JupyterLab Desktop's context and inherit TCC permissions previously granted to the application, including access to protected Documents, Desktop, or Downloads folders without another macOS prompt. Exploitation requires existing local code execution and prior TCC grants; it does not provide initial or remote code execution. Windows and Linux are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.6.2-1.
      CVSSadded
      —
      AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-94
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-693
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-250
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2025/55xxx/CVE-2025-55002.json">CVE-2025-55002</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/commit/5ea4bf3323b0b7acc943a867522819a7064bec38
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/releases/tag/v4.6.2-1
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/security/advisories/GHSA-5c3f-5gj7-p9xh

      Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-55002
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-55002"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-55002.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-55002 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>