Libsoup: integer overflow in cookie expiration date handling in libsoup (CVE-2025-4945)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI, Debian LTS, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in the cookie parsing logic of the libsoup HTTP library, used in GNOME applications and other software. The vulnerability arises when processing the expiration date of cookies, where a specially crafted value can trigger an integer overflow.
Update Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 to version 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.9, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 to version 0:3.6.5-3.el10_1.6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support to version 0:2.62.2-9.el7_9.
- Affected
- Libsoup
lte *..3.6.5 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
lt *..0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.9 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
lt *..0:3.6.5-3.el10_1.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
lt *..0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
lt *..0:2.62.3-10.el8_10 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
lt *..0:2.62.3-1.el8_2.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
lt *..0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
lt *..0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
lt *..0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
lt *..0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:2.62.3-3.el8_8.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
lt *..0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
lt *..0:2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:2.72.0-8.el9_0.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:2.72.0-8.el9_2.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
lt *..0:2.72.0-8.el9_4.6
- Libsoup
- Fixed in
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.9 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
0:3.6.5-3.el10_1.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
0:2.62.2-9.el7_9 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
0:2.62.3-10.el8_10 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
0:2.62.3-1.el8_2.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:2.62.3-3.el8_8.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
0:2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:2.72.0-8.el9_0.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:2.72.0-8.el9_2.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
0:2.72.0-8.el9_4.6
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
3.7
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
3.7
CVSS v3
Severity Low on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI, Debian LTS, CVE.org
0.7 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 53.1
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Low
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 50.07 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 3.7 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 3.7
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.7 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 53.1
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 19 March 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-190
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in the cookie parsing logic of the libsoup HTTP library, used in GNOME applications and other software. The vulnerability arises when processing the expiration date of cookies, where a specially crafted value can trigger an integer overflow. This may result in undefined behavior, allowing an attacker to bypass cookie expiration logic, causing persistent or unintended cookie behavior. The issue stems from improper validation of large integer inputs during date arithmetic operations within the cookie parsing routines.
Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, Debian LTS Advisories, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | libsoup |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux |
|
|
| Red Hat | OpenShift Container Platform |
|
|
| Xerox | FreeFlow Print Server |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Debian Libsoup2.4
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Red Hat Openshift Container Platform
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-life Add-on
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | libsoup2.4 | bullseye |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-190Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Base
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Entry at MITRE CWE-190
References & sources
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:19713Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:19714Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:19720Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:20959Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21032Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21655Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21656Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21657Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21664Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21665Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21666Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:21772Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:22013Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comsecurity/cve/CVE-2025-4945Vulnerability database, x_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.comRHBZ#2367175Issue tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT
- gitlab.gnome.orgGNOME/libsoup/-/issues/448
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedRed Hat
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed …, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 (+17)…, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 (+16)Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-4945"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-4945.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-4945 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>